The Greenland War of 2026

You MAGA are all alike. Just ignore Trump’s own words. Of course, it is refreshing that you are calling Trump a liar when he says he hasn’t taken military force off the table. We can at least agree that he lies.
Why would Trump ever take military force off the table? What if Greenland gets attacked? We need Greenland for national security. The Euro cucks are peeing their pants needlessly showing their irrational TDS. Trump is friendly with the President of Norway. They'll work something out.
 
From the Wall Street Journal:

For more than 75 years, the fondest dream of Russian strategy has been to divide Western Europe from the U.S. and break the NATO alliance. That is now a possibility as President Trump presses his campaign to capture Greenland no matter what the locals or its Denmark owner thinks.

Mr. Trump on Saturday threatened to impose a 10% tariff starting Feb. 1 on a handful of European countries that have opposed his attempt to obtain U.S. sovereignty over Greenland. The tariff would jump to 25% on June 1. Presumably this tariff would come on top of the rates Mr. Trump already negotiated in trade deals last year (10% for Britain, 15% for the European Union).

The targets are Denmark (which owns Greenland), Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Finland and the United Kingdom. All participated in a recent military exercise on the world’s largest island that was intended to reassure Washington that Europe wants to work with the U.S. to defend Greenland from Russia and China….

No one should underestimate the shock his Greenland project is producing among allies. Along with his tariffs and his tilt toward Russia against Ukraine, he is alienating Western Europe in a way that will be hard to repair. It’s true that Europe may not be in a position to resist if Mr. Trump really wants to go to war over the island. But say good-bye to NATO.

The sad irony is that China and Russia may be the biggest winners, though Mr. Trump justifies his Greenland necessity in the name of deterring both. Canada’s Prime Minister bent the knee to Xi Jinping this past week, and Britain’s PM is heading there this month. The EU and South American countries have struck a big free-trade pact...


*******************************

I’ve said it many times but Xi and Putin have to love Trump. Even the WSJ now acknowledges that Trump is doing the work of our adversaries. I don’t know if the evil that Trump is undertaking can ever be undone. The reputation of the US is shot.

The reputation of the US is now just like Trump’s: Unreliable, lying, chaotic, bullying, and most of all untrustworthy.

Who the **** believes anything Trump negotiates? He makes agreements and disregard them on a whim. Just like he did with his contractors. Just like he did with his so-called trade agreements. Why deal with Trump? He lies and his word is trash.

I have no doubt Trump wants to invade Greenland, whether he does or not, will depend on whether there is a cabinet member that can get through to him, which I seriously doubt.

Forget the Pub Congress. They are just Trump’s eunuchs.

Say goodbye to the US as we knew it. We are on the way to pariah status.
How fucked up is Trump when Xi looks like the saner option

WTF
 
In a normal world, we’d see a group of congressional Republicans walk into the Oval Office tomorrow.

They’d tell the President that the insane letter he wrote was the last straw, that this simply cannot continue, and that it’s over. They’d tell Melania that her husband is unwell and needs help.

Either resign or be impeached immediately, they’d tell him, and they leave.

In a normal world.
This is not a normal world any longer
 

"
Dear Jonas,
Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.
Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a "right of ownership" anyway?
There are no written documents, it's only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also.
I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States.
The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.
Thank you!
President DJT"

Trump's letter to Norway.

Is Trump trying to sound like an angry teenager or what? His logic is beyond believe stupid.

Norway doesn't give the Nobel Prize. The Nobel Prize is from SWEDEN and even the country of Sweden doesn't give it.

Trump's logic of "give me the Nobel Prize then I will think of peace".... er.... I'm sure you have to show you like peace first.

And then his claim of 8 wars stopped, it's such dumb ******* ignorance. Trump doesn't even know what's happened in the DRC or Cambodia/Thailand etc.

Really, it's beyond believe that anyone would think Trump older than a teenager if they'd read this letter.

"Dear call, today we're going to write a letter to Norway, explain why we're doing something stupid"

"Dear Jonas, **** you, **** you, **** you"

"Donald, I'm going to speak to your parents, your letter is not appropriate".
 
Monroe Doctrine, boy.
Do you even know what the Monroe Doctrine is?

The Monroe Doctrine, proclaimed by President James Monroe in 1823, was a U.S. foreign policy opposing European colonialism and intervention in the Americas, asserting the Western Hemisphere as a distinct sphere of influence closed to further colonization, while the U.S. pledged not to interfere in European affairs. It warned European powers that any attempts to control or interfere with newly independent nations in the Americas would be seen as hostile, establishing the U.S. as a protector of the hemisphere and a significant force in world affairs, influencing American strategy for centuries.
 

For 75 years, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization has been a force for peace that stared down the Soviet Union, prevented a larger war in the Balkans, joined in the fight against international terrorism and even now stands ready to defend all NATO territory from Russian aggression

Yes there have been disagreements but the fact remains that it was establised 75 years ago and still standing.

Yes it would be nice if everyone agreed all the time but that is not the way of the world.
NATO nations were not contributing their fair share. Thankfully Trump corrected that. They were not capable of preventing anything and probably still would not be if it were not for the U.S.
 
NATO nations were not contributing their fair share. Thankfully Trump corrected that. They were not capable of preventing anything and probably still would not be if it were not for the U.S.
Awwww geez… this stupid shit again .
Yeah they are and no it has no bearing on this
 
Well back in 2016 when Hillary was running, I was hedging my bets in case she actually won. You know damned well she would have passed another "assault weapons" ban. And having accumulated so much 7.62x39 ammo when it was so cheap, I succumbed to that beauty at my local gun store.

Actually, it was assembled in Texas by an American company, and out of Hungarian parts. It retailed for $800, but I traded in a Colt Woodsman .22 pistol that I only had $100 in.

It's guaranteed to put commies down at 100 meters, if need be.
Uhm, I don't even measure distance in meters. :dunno:
I can put a bullet through a quarter at about 25-30 yards, though. With a pistol.
That's the outside of that thing being accurate. Anything closer and I can hit within a dime.
I have other guns that should be better and aren't. All guns are not created equal. 😆
Really don't even like pistols. That one's acceptable, though. I can hit golf balls with it.
 
Last edited:
They're building the North American Technate. Some of you are literally cheering for a long-standing globalist / technocrat plan.




(for those of you in Rio Linda, this guy below is being sarcastic)




 
How fucked up is Trump when Xi looks like the saner option

WTF
Of course you'd think a Marxist with slaves would be a 'saner option.' TDS has rotted your brain.
 
This is the problem of putting a predatory money maker in power. He doesn't understand about global politics, doesn't care about global politics.

He thinks he can bully people. But the US is going to be very alone. You can't project power by being alone. If you can't use European bases, how would you attack the Middle East? Annoy Japan and South Korea, you can't threaten China.

He doesn't think about these things, and it's costing the US big time.
It gets even worse as Trump is egotistical and believes he always makes the right decision. He is an Ego maniac with an ego so large that it cannot be controlled. He does even try to control it. The mistakes he makes is obvious to most. His supporters are only intrested in what he can do for them.

Their is no us but only me the ego

yet people are getting tire of it and being turn off by this ego maniac. Trumps wealth came from his daddy. Yes he made some good moves to increase that wealth

He will be 79 years old soon.

Term limits will end it. He will fight it.
 
The Czech PM agrees with Trump. Slowly but surely the wise leaders are realizing that America can save their life and having Greenland is not insignificant

1768873231814.webp
 
They're building the North American Technate. Some of you are literally cheering for a long-standing globalist / technocrat plan.




(for those of you in Rio Linda, this guy below is being sarcastic)





The map you posted clearly calls those areas a 'technate' which was part of a technocracy movement which was supposed to replace government with scientists, engineers and tech experts. I has nothing to do with Trump or his administration or invading anyone.
 
Awwww geez… this stupid shit again .
Yeah they are and no it has no bearing on this
I know the truth is 'stupid shit' to you because you always seem to shun it like a vampire to a cross and NO they were not contributing what they promised and left the responsibility primarily to the U.S.
 
The map you posted clearly calls those areas a 'technate' which was part of a technocracy movement which was supposed to replace government with scientists, engineers and tech experts. I has nothing to do with Trump or his administration or invading anyone.

It hasn't happened yet! That was my point, it is a long-standing plan of the globalists / technocrats that is obviously not yet fulfilled but we're heading in that direction.

Trump is surrounded by billionaire Technocrats, including some of his funders, and some of them have been very open about their plans for the future. I'm not making this up, do the research.

And to anyone who thinks it's "fake news" that we're moving toward Technocracy, here's a fun fact for you. Elon Musk's grandfather, Joshua N. Haldeman, was a prominent figure in the Technocracy movement in Canada during the 1930s and 1940s, advocating for a society run by scientists and engineers.... Haldeman led the Canadian branch of Technocracy Incorporated, which promoted scientific management over traditional politics.

 
Last edited:
15th post
It hasn't happened yet! That was my point, it is a long-standing plan of the globalists / technocrats that is obviously not yet fulfilled but we're heading in that direction.

Trump is surrounded by billionaire Technocrats, including some of his funders, and some of them have been very open about their plans for the future. I'm not making this up, do the research.

And to anyone who thinks it's "fake news" that we're moving toward Technocracy, here's a fun fact for you. Elon Musk's grandfather, Joshua N. Haldeman, was a prominent figure in the Technocracy movement in Canada during the 1930s and 1940s, advocating for a society run by scientists and engineers.... Haldeman led the Canadian branch of Technocracy Incorporated, which promoted scientific management over traditional politics.


Do you actually think that if Trump buys Greenland he'll turn it over to technocrats? You're not that insane are you? Look, technology is a reality and is always on going. America needs to be at the forefront. Besides if Putin or Xi invade Greenland you can bet they'll use technology the threaten us and all of the Americas just as they are doing now only they'll be physically closer and control the shipping lanes.
 
Last edited:
NATO nations were not contributing their fair share. Thankfully Trump corrected that. They were not capable of preventing anything and probably still would not be if it were not for the U.S.
That argument is iirrelevant as it depends on size and number of people.

US is ranked 10 th on the wealthest country

Estonia and Poland beat out the US in wealth.
Lexenbourg is at the top.

Yes the US is near the top 10th on the list

Number 1 is Luxembourg and then Singapore but they are not world powers.

Far share argument is flawed as wealth in this world is not evenly distributed.





Luxembourg
2
Singapore
3
Ireland
4
Macao
*
5
Qatar
6
Bermuda
*
7
Norway
8
Switzerland
9
Brunei
10
United States of America
11
Netherlands
12
Faroe Islands
*
13
Iceland
14
Guyana
15
United Arab Emirates
16
Denmark
17
Hong Kong
*
18
Andorra
19
Austria
20
Belgium
21
Germany
22
Australia
23
Saudi Arabia
24
Sweden
25
Malta
26
Bahrain
27
Canada
28
Finland
29
United Kingdom
30
France
31
Italy
32
South Korea
33
Czechia
34
Spain
35
Slovenia
36
Israel
37
New Zealand
38
Lithuania
39
Sint Maarten
*
40
Kuwait
41
Japan
42
Portugal
43
Aruba
*
44
Poland
45
Puerto Rico
*
46
Estonia
47
Croatia
48
Romania
49
Russia
50
Hungary
[td]
151,063 $​
[/td]​
[td]
150,689 $​
[/td]​
[td]
137,994 $​
[/td]​
[td]
126,960 $​
[/td]​
[td]
126,046 $​
[/td]​
[td]
124,253 $​
[/td]​
[td]
101,003 $​
[/td]​
[td]
94,116 $​
[/td]​
[td]
89,879 $​
[/td]​
[td]
84,534 $​
[/td]​
[td]
83,356 $​
[/td]​
[td]
81,909 $​
[/td]​
[td]
81,416 $​
[/td]​
[td]
80,155 $​
[/td]​
[td]
79,229 $​
[/td]​
[td]
78,601 $​
[/td]​
[td]
75,196 $​
[/td]​
[td]
74,939 $​
[/td]​
[td]
73,427 $​
[/td]​
[td]
72,977 $​
[/td]​
[td]
72,693 $​
[/td]​
[td]
71,410 $​
[/td]​
[td]
71,375 $​
[/td]​
[td]
70,285 $​
[/td]​
[td]
69,832 $​
[/td]​
[td]
66,941 $​
[/td]​
[td]
65,533 $​
[/td]​
[td]
64,044 $​
[/td]​
[td]
61,322 $​
[/td]​
[td]
61,259 $​
[/td]​
[td]
61,088 $​
[/td]​
[td]
58,895 $​
[/td]​
[td]
57,015 $​
[/td]​
[td]
56,974 $​
[/td]​
[td]
56,882 $​
[/td]​
[td]
55,691 $​
[/td]​
[td]
55,611 $​
[/td]​
[td]
54,410 $​
[/td]​
[td]
53,769 $​
[/td]​
[td]
52,444 $​
[/td]​
[td]
51,703 $​
[/td]​
[td]
51,402 $​
[/td]​
[td]
50,649 $​
[/td]​
[td]
50,541 $​
[/td]​
[td]
50,248 $​
[/td]​
[td]
49,743 $​
[/td]​
[td]
48,817 $​
[/td]​
[td]
48,731 $​
[/td]​
[td]
48,220 $​
[/td]​
[td]
47,598 $​
[/td]​
 
Do you actually think that if Trump buys Greenland he'll turn it over to technocrats? You're not that insane are you? Besides if Putin or Xi invade Greenland you can bet they'll use technology the threaten us and all of the Americas.

Don't add to my words. My main point is that we're moving toward technocracy and world government. As for some of his billionaire technocrat buddies, you might want to read this article:


PS: What is insane is to trust the government and trust the words of a proven liar.
 
It's far more likely that other NATO members will fight for the US, than the US would fight for other countries.

Like, Afghanistan, where the US was attacked and then NATO went to Afghanistan to fight the Taliban.
NATO did not go to Afghanistan. A few NATO countries joined us. Denmark and Norway were not among them.

Please check your facts before posting.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom