The Great Israeli lie

[Snouter]

The thread title makes no sense. THere has never been "Israelis" even in the ridiculous horseshit of the Old Testament. The tribe of Judah is the only remaining tribe of the 12 tribes of Israel. Jewi is probably more consistent, though still nonsensical mythical bullshit. Sorry to the inbred folks who pride themselves on being chosen by Yahweh a non-existent faggot deity that never did anything the Old Testament testified to!

 

[Phoenall]

and the arab siege on Jerusalem and the hijacking of the convoys? You can go back months and years of arab attacks on jews in the holy land. 1918, 1920's, 1939.....can take it back a century of attacks on jews. You want to take it back to 8th C CE?

There were no recorded major incidents of violence in that area until the Zionist migration at the turn of the last century. And only one poster here, I forgot who that was, has provided any evidence of a major incident between Jews and Arabs and that was around 1833. But nothing after that until Hebron. That's almost a 100 years of living peacefully with other.

Once the Zionists started showing up treating Arabs like garbage, all hell broke loose. When you start treating people like shit right off the bat, what do you expect is going to happen? You started it; you had it coming!

And if you think that's bullshit, then explain the following comment from someone who was living there at that time...

... the settlers must under no circumstances arouse the wrath of the natives ... 'Yet what do our brethren do in Palestine? Just the very opposite! Serfs they were in the lands of the Diaspora and suddenly they find themselves in unrestricted freedom and this change has awakened in them an inclination to despotism. They treat the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, deprive them of their rights, offend them without cause and even boast of these deeds; and nobody among us opposes this despicable and dangerous inclination...
- Ahad Ha'am (famous Zionist humanist)

Care to explain the part in bold?

Or are you just going to ignore it, like everyone else has (including RoccoR).

Did you read it all or did you just copy the part from some white supremacist site. Did you read where the arab muslims were treating the Jews with hostility and cruelty, depriving them of their rights and being arrogant about it.

Or how about the statute entered into INTERNATIONAL LAW that proclaims
Article 22 laid down no rules for the selection of the Mandatory Powers or for the distribution of mandates between them. Turkey and Germany were simply made to renounce their claims to sovereignty over the territories whose distribution was to be decided by the Allied Powers. Germany's divestiture of titles was codified in the Treaty of Versailles (article 119). In the case of Turkey, such renunciation was provided for in the Treaty of Sevres of 1920 (article 132) but, since that treaty never came into force, the renunciation of Turkish claims over non-Turkish territories was formalized in the Treaty of Lausanne. The treaties of Versailles and of Lausanne contained explicit provisions empowering the Allied Powers to apportion the "freed" territories as their mandates.