The GOP has a stable of potential winners, the Dems have one old mare

[Redfish]

Once again, Republicans with no qualified candidates attack the Dems with the most qualified candidate in the race

you have yet to give us a list of her qualifications and accomplishments. waiting------------------------------------------------------------------------------------crickets-------------------------------------------------------waiting.

So far, her biggest qualification seems to be marrying WJC, and retaining his last name while carpetbagging her way to NY, then being appointed SoS when she lost to Obama

She is more qualified than Jeb Bush, who has no foreign policy experience.

Hmmm, was foreign policy experience a requirement when you elected obozo?

But Jeb will not be the GOP nominee, so ---------------------------------

So now you're withdrawing your insistence on certain qualifications.

John McCain had no executive experience.

neither did obama, whats your point?

 

[rightwinger]

Once again, Republicans with no qualified candidates attack the Dems with the most qualified candidate in the race

you have yet to give us a list of her qualifications and accomplishments. waiting------------------------------------------------------------------------------------crickets-------------------------------------------------------waiting.

I see you concede your stable of candidates have no qualifications for President

Hillary?
Eight years in the Whitehouse involved in day to day operations, meeting international leaders meeting the press

Eight years as a US Senator, passing legislation, forming political coalitions, dealing with both parties

Four years as Secretary of State. Meeting international leaders, representing your countries interests, being in the Presidents cabinet

Now.....let's hear the qualifications of YOUR stable before you begin attacking Hillary again

Ok, wow. got elected in a state she never lived in based on her last name and not on any qualifications-------wonderful. she had zero legislation passed with her name on it.

accumulated a lot of frequet flyer miles--------------that qualifies her for what, becoming a flight attendent?

Each of the GOP candidates will have to justify his/her qualifications for president. When we settle on one, his/her qualifications will be put out for the entire nation to review.

I listed Hillarys qualifications

You failed to name a single Republican who is more qualified. All of them is a Sarah Palin type response...can't you do better?

you listed bullshit talking points, but for the record she failed at every govt job she ever had, including FLOTUS.


Walker, Kasich, Jindal, Bush-------successful governors
Carson, Fiorina, Trump, ---------successful in business and medicine
Paul, Rubio, Graham, ----------successful senators

just for starters.

But on the subject of qualifications-------------you elected obozo twice and he had zero qualifications to be president. So obviously qualifications do not matter to you

Been there done that

Let's just admit that any accomplishment coming from a liberal will be denounced as a failure by conservatives

 

[Redfish]

When we decide on one candidate that will be done and presented to the entire nation.

You have one candidate, you support her. I asked you why you support her and what she has done to earn that support.

If the answer is "nothing, I just vote dem" then fine, say that and move on.

We don't have one candidate, and I don't support her.

So why are you trying to hold Hillary Clinton you won't hold the GOP candidates to?

So who is your dem candidate?

Every candidate should be fully vetted by the media and his/her opposition regardless of party. If this had been done on obama, he would never have been elected.

question for you, why was obama given a pass on the vetting process by the media?

Seems Obama was fully vetted

What relevant questions about him were not answered?

Oh come on. Are you really that ignorant and uninformed?

Rezko, Ayers, Wright, his kenyan brother, his grandmother's untimely death after she made a statement about his kenyan birth, his muslim upbringing, his pot use, his coke use, his homosexual encounters, his trips to pakistan when travel to pakistan was banned for americans, his Conn SS number when he never lived in that state.

The MSM ignored all of these questions because they were ejaculating over the first black president.

The problem with Republicans is that is what served as vetting in 2008. They had a candidate with twenty years experience and a heroic war record against a political newcomer

Instead of attacking his lack of qualifications, they chose to go after his church, his birth certificate, whether he loved his country, his religion......the American public just laughed off their conspiracy nuttiness

somewhat true. but those conspiracy theories were started by the clintons during the primary, the GOP just continued them while the clintons dropped them in exchange for the SecState job.

 

[Redfish]

you have yet to give us a list of her qualifications and accomplishments. waiting------------------------------------------------------------------------------------crickets-------------------------------------------------------waiting.

I see you concede your stable of candidates have no qualifications for President

Hillary?
Eight years in the Whitehouse involved in day to day operations, meeting international leaders meeting the press

Eight years as a US Senator, passing legislation, forming political coalitions, dealing with both parties

Four years as Secretary of State. Meeting international leaders, representing your countries interests, being in the Presidents cabinet

Now.....let's hear the qualifications of YOUR stable before you begin attacking Hillary again

Ok, wow. got elected in a state she never lived in based on her last name and not on any qualifications-------wonderful. she had zero legislation passed with her name on it.

accumulated a lot of frequet flyer miles--------------that qualifies her for what, becoming a flight attendent?

Each of the GOP candidates will have to justify his/her qualifications for president. When we settle on one, his/her qualifications will be put out for the entire nation to review.

I listed Hillarys qualifications

You failed to name a single Republican who is more qualified. All of them is a Sarah Palin type response...can't you do better?

you listed bullshit talking points, but for the record she failed at every govt job she ever had, including FLOTUS.


Walker, Kasich, Jindal, Bush-------successful governors
Carson, Fiorina, Trump, ---------successful in business and medicine
Paul, Rubio, Graham, ----------successful senators

just for starters.

But on the subject of qualifications-------------you elected obozo twice and he had zero qualifications to be president. So obviously qualifications do not matter to you

Been there done that

Let's just admit that any accomplishment coming from a liberal will be denounced as a failure by conservatives

and vice versa, thats what politics is all about, trying to fool the voters.

 

[Redfish]

you have yet to give us a list of her qualifications and accomplishments. waiting------------------------------------------------------------------------------------crickets-------------------------------------------------------waiting.

I see you concede your stable of candidates have no qualifications for President

Hillary?
Eight years in the Whitehouse involved in day to day operations, meeting international leaders meeting the press

Eight years as a US Senator, passing legislation, forming political coalitions, dealing with both parties

Four years as Secretary of State. Meeting international leaders, representing your countries interests, being in the Presidents cabinet

Now.....let's hear the qualifications of YOUR stable before you begin attacking Hillary again

Ok, wow. got elected in a state she never lived in based on her last name and not on any qualifications-------wonderful. she had zero legislation passed with her name on it.

accumulated a lot of frequet flyer miles--------------that qualifies her for what, becoming a flight attendent?

Each of the GOP candidates will have to justify his/her qualifications for president. When we settle on one, his/her qualifications will be put out for the entire nation to review.

I listed Hillarys qualifications

You failed to name a single Republican who is more qualified. All of them is a Sarah Palin type response...can't you do better?

you listed bullshit talking points, but for the record she failed at every govt job she ever had, including FLOTUS.


Walker, Kasich, Jindal, Bush-------successful governors
Carson, Fiorina, Trump, ---------successful in business and medicine
Paul, Rubio, Graham, ----------successful senators

just for starters.

But on the subject of qualifications-------------you elected obozo twice and he had zero qualifications to be president. So obviously qualifications do not matter to you

Been there done that

Let's just admit that any accomplishment coming from a liberal will be denounced as a failure by conservatives

BTW, your sig line is very appropriate for those who choose to argue with you.

 

[Auld Phart]

Once again, Republicans with no qualified candidates attack the Dems with the most qualified candidate in the race

you have yet to give us a list of her qualifications and accomplishments. waiting------------------------------------------------------------------------------------crickets-------------------------------------------------------waiting.

So far, her biggest qualification seems to be marrying WJC, and retaining his last name while carpetbagging her way to NY, then being appointed SoS when she lost to Obama

She is more qualified than Jeb Bush, who has no foreign policy experience.

Hmmm, was foreign policy experience a requirement when you elected obozo?

But Jeb will not be the GOP nominee, so ---------------------------------

So now you're withdrawing your insistence on certain qualifications.

John McCain had no executive experience.

Neither did Obama in 2008. and McCain had a ton more experience as a senator.

 

[rightwinger]

We don't have one candidate, and I don't support her.

So why are you trying to hold Hillary Clinton you won't hold the GOP candidates to?

So who is your dem candidate?

Every candidate should be fully vetted by the media and his/her opposition regardless of party. If this had been done on obama, he would never have been elected.

question for you, why was obama given a pass on the vetting process by the media?

Seems Obama was fully vetted

What relevant questions about him were not answered?

Oh come on. Are you really that ignorant and uninformed?

Rezko, Ayers, Wright, his kenyan brother, his grandmother's untimely death after she made a statement about his kenyan birth, his muslim upbringing, his pot use, his coke use, his homosexual encounters, his trips to pakistan when travel to pakistan was banned for americans, his Conn SS number when he never lived in that state.

The MSM ignored all of these questions because they were ejaculating over the first black president.

The problem with Republicans is that is what served as vetting in 2008. They had a candidate with twenty years experience and a heroic war record against a political newcomer

Instead of attacking his lack of qualifications, they chose to go after his church, his birth certificate, whether he loved his country, his religion......the American public just laughed off their conspiracy nuttiness

somewhat true. but those conspiracy theories were started by the clintons during the primary, the GOP just continued them while the clintons dropped them in exchange for the SecState job.

Actually it was the rightwing media that decided that was the best way to run against a "negro"
Question his love of country, his religion, whether he hates whites, whether he can speak without a TelePrompTer

Republicans ran an amateuristic political campaign and got squashed

The same will happen if they use the same tactics against Hillary

 

[rightwinger]

I see you concede your stable of candidates have no qualifications for President

Hillary?
Eight years in the Whitehouse involved in day to day operations, meeting international leaders meeting the press

Eight years as a US Senator, passing legislation, forming political coalitions, dealing with both parties

Four years as Secretary of State. Meeting international leaders, representing your countries interests, being in the Presidents cabinet

Now.....let's hear the qualifications of YOUR stable before you begin attacking Hillary again

Ok, wow. got elected in a state she never lived in based on her last name and not on any qualifications-------wonderful. she had zero legislation passed with her name on it.

accumulated a lot of frequet flyer miles--------------that qualifies her for what, becoming a flight attendent?

Each of the GOP candidates will have to justify his/her qualifications for president. When we settle on one, his/her qualifications will be put out for the entire nation to review.

I listed Hillarys qualifications

You failed to name a single Republican who is more qualified. All of them is a Sarah Palin type response...can't you do better?

you listed bullshit talking points, but for the record she failed at every govt job she ever had, including FLOTUS.


Walker, Kasich, Jindal, Bush-------successful governors
Carson, Fiorina, Trump, ---------successful in business and medicine
Paul, Rubio, Graham, ----------successful senators

just for starters.

But on the subject of qualifications-------------you elected obozo twice and he had zero qualifications to be president. So obviously qualifications do not matter to you

Been there done that

Let's just admit that any accomplishment coming from a liberal will be denounced as a failure by conservatives

BTW, your sig line is very appropriate for those who choose to argue with you.

You came to mind when I posted it

 

[NYcarbineer]

you have yet to give us a list of her qualifications and accomplishments. waiting------------------------------------------------------------------------------------crickets-------------------------------------------------------waiting.

So far, her biggest qualification seems to be marrying WJC, and retaining his last name while carpetbagging her way to NY, then being appointed SoS when she lost to Obama

She is more qualified than Jeb Bush, who has no foreign policy experience.

Hmmm, was foreign policy experience a requirement when you elected obozo?

But Jeb will not be the GOP nominee, so ---------------------------------

So now you're withdrawing your insistence on certain qualifications.

John McCain had no executive experience.

Neither did Obama in 2008. and McCain had a ton more experience as a senator.

So in 2012 when Obama had 4 years experience as PRESIDENT, vs. Romneys ZERO experience as President,

Obama won the experience contest hands down?

lol

 

[Auld Phart]

So far, her biggest qualification seems to be marrying WJC, and retaining his last name while carpetbagging her way to NY, then being appointed SoS when she lost to Obama

She is more qualified than Jeb Bush, who has no foreign policy experience.

Hmmm, was foreign policy experience a requirement when you elected obozo?

But Jeb will not be the GOP nominee, so ---------------------------------

So now you're withdrawing your insistence on certain qualifications.

John McCain had no executive experience.

Neither did Obama in 2008. and McCain had a ton more experience as a senator.

So in 2012 when Obama had 4 years experience as PRESIDENT, vs. Romneys ZERO experience as President,

Obama won the experience contest hands down?

lol

Forget about his time governing Mass.?

The years he had running a successful company?

Bet the hell out of Obamas experience entering the WH, and considering Obamas first 4 years, Romney still had him beat on experience.

 

[rightwinger]

She is more qualified than Jeb Bush, who has no foreign policy experience.

Hmmm, was foreign policy experience a requirement when you elected obozo?

But Jeb will not be the GOP nominee, so ---------------------------------

So now you're withdrawing your insistence on certain qualifications.

John McCain had no executive experience.

Neither did Obama in 2008. and McCain had a ton more experience as a senator.

So in 2012 when Obama had 4 years experience as PRESIDENT, vs. Romneys ZERO experience as President,

Obama won the experience contest hands down?

lol

Forget about his time governing Mass.?

The years he had running a successful company?

Bet the hell out of Obamas experience entering the WH, and considering Obamas first 4 years, Romney still had him beat on experience.

Too funny
They just can't admit their shortcomings

Romney was more experienced than Obama...seriously

 

[Redfish]

Hmmm, was foreign policy experience a requirement when you elected obozo?

But Jeb will not be the GOP nominee, so ---------------------------------

So now you're withdrawing your insistence on certain qualifications.

John McCain had no executive experience.

Neither did Obama in 2008. and McCain had a ton more experience as a senator.

So in 2012 when Obama had 4 years experience as PRESIDENT, vs. Romneys ZERO experience as President,

Obama won the experience contest hands down?

lol

Forget about his time governing Mass.?

The years he had running a successful company?

Bet the hell out of Obamas experience entering the WH, and considering Obamas first 4 years, Romney still had him beat on experience.

Too funny
They just can't admit their shortcomings

Romney was more experienced than Obama...seriously

At actually doing things, running things, accomplishing things------------YES, overwhelmingly.

 

[Dot Com]

where does OP stand on campaign financing?

 

[NYcarbineer]

She is more qualified than Jeb Bush, who has no foreign policy experience.

Hmmm, was foreign policy experience a requirement when you elected obozo?

But Jeb will not be the GOP nominee, so ---------------------------------

So now you're withdrawing your insistence on certain qualifications.

John McCain had no executive experience.

Neither did Obama in 2008. and McCain had a ton more experience as a senator.

So in 2012 when Obama had 4 years experience as PRESIDENT, vs. Romneys ZERO experience as President,

Obama won the experience contest hands down?

lol

Forget about his time governing Mass.?

The years he had running a successful company?

Bet the hell out of Obamas experience entering the WH, and considering Obamas first 4 years, Romney still had him beat on experience.

How many years experience as President of the United States did Romney have?

 

[Dot Com]

So now you're withdrawing your insistence on certain qualifications.

John McCain had no executive experience.

Neither did Obama in 2008. and McCain had a ton more experience as a senator.

So in 2012 when Obama had 4 years experience as PRESIDENT, vs. Romneys ZERO experience as President,

Obama won the experience contest hands down?

lol

Forget about his time governing Mass.?

The years he had running a successful company?

Bet the hell out of Obamas experience entering the WH, and considering Obamas first 4 years, Romney still had him beat on experience.

Too funny
They just can't admit their shortcomings

Romney was more experienced than Obama...seriously

At actually doing things, running things, accomplishing things------------YES, overwhelmingly.

if you consider "buying and shuttering factories" an accomplishment. Put down the rw kool aid son

 

[NYcarbineer]

So now you're withdrawing your insistence on certain qualifications.

John McCain had no executive experience.

Neither did Obama in 2008. and McCain had a ton more experience as a senator.

So in 2012 when Obama had 4 years experience as PRESIDENT, vs. Romneys ZERO experience as President,

Obama won the experience contest hands down?

lol

Forget about his time governing Mass.?

The years he had running a successful company?

Bet the hell out of Obamas experience entering the WH, and considering Obamas first 4 years, Romney still had him beat on experience.

Too funny
They just can't admit their shortcomings

Romney was more experienced than Obama...seriously

At actually doing things, running things, accomplishing things------------YES, overwhelmingly.

Did you vote for Dole in 1996?

 

[Redfish]

Hmmm, was foreign policy experience a requirement when you elected obozo?

But Jeb will not be the GOP nominee, so ---------------------------------

So now you're withdrawing your insistence on certain qualifications.

John McCain had no executive experience.

Neither did Obama in 2008. and McCain had a ton more experience as a senator.

So in 2012 when Obama had 4 years experience as PRESIDENT, vs. Romneys ZERO experience as President,

Obama won the experience contest hands down?

lol

Forget about his time governing Mass.?

The years he had running a successful company?

Bet the hell out of Obamas experience entering the WH, and considering Obamas first 4 years, Romney still had him beat on experience.

How many years experience as President of the United States did Romney have?

well duh, how many did obozo have before he was elected?????????? are you as dumb as you seem?

 

[Redfish]

Neither did Obama in 2008. and McCain had a ton more experience as a senator.

So in 2012 when Obama had 4 years experience as PRESIDENT, vs. Romneys ZERO experience as President,

Obama won the experience contest hands down?

lol

Forget about his time governing Mass.?

The years he had running a successful company?

Bet the hell out of Obamas experience entering the WH, and considering Obamas first 4 years, Romney still had him beat on experience.

Too funny
They just can't admit their shortcomings

Romney was more experienced than Obama...seriously

At actually doing things, running things, accomplishing things------------YES, overwhelmingly.

Did you vote for Dole in 1996?

No, I voted against Clinton.

 

[Redfish]

Neither did Obama in 2008. and McCain had a ton more experience as a senator.

So in 2012 when Obama had 4 years experience as PRESIDENT, vs. Romneys ZERO experience as President,

Obama won the experience contest hands down?

lol

Forget about his time governing Mass.?

The years he had running a successful company?

Bet the hell out of Obamas experience entering the WH, and considering Obamas first 4 years, Romney still had him beat on experience.

Too funny
They just can't admit their shortcomings

Romney was more experienced than Obama...seriously

At actually doing things, running things, accomplishing things------------YES, overwhelmingly.

if you consider "buying and shuttering factories" an accomplishment. Put down the rw kool aid son

consoilidating failing companies into successful ones is not a failure. Ask the employees of Staples.

But if thats the test, lets talk about the GM bailout which was done with taxpayer money to save the UAW.

 

[Auld Phart]

Neither did Obama in 2008. and McCain had a ton more experience as a senator.

So in 2012 when Obama had 4 years experience as PRESIDENT, vs. Romneys ZERO experience as President,

Obama won the experience contest hands down?

lol

Forget about his time governing Mass.?

The years he had running a successful company?

Bet the hell out of Obamas experience entering the WH, and considering Obamas first 4 years, Romney still had him beat on experience.

Too funny
They just can't admit their shortcomings

Romney was more experienced than Obama...seriously

At actually doing things, running things, accomplishing things------------YES, overwhelmingly.

Did you vote for Dole in 1996?

Over the4 used car salesman that had just lost Congress to the Republicans>

Of course.

How many years experience did Dole have as a senator?

(Hint: more than Hillary and Obama combined.)