whitehall
Diamond Member
It's gotta be true if you can find it on the internet. Why does the USMB allow foreign posters to reproduce this anti-American junk on the forum?
The GOP agenda for the next few years.
- Thread starter Tommy Tainant
- Start date
....will control speech on X and Facebook
ShahdagMountains
Diamond Member
- Jan 16, 2012
- 9,408
- 9,036
- 2,128
Many of us are all for America.
Have strong connections to it.
Don’t let a few bad apples like Tainant poison the well.
Tommy Tainant
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #164
So you want a safe space ?
kyzr
Diamond Member
No, just wondering why you prefer to post here, in US politics, instead of about your "KING" and his whore?
Do you have any idea how Americans view "Royalty"?
Tommy Tainant
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #166
You love it.
kyzr
Diamond Member
Nope. They have no special birthright. You their equal, or at least should be. I oppose "royals" and "royalty".
Here we have those born into wealth, earned by their forefathers, but they aren't viewed as royals, their wealth can disappear if they are stupid.
It has a ready and willing audience with the DemoKKKrats and their ilk. Most of the world considers the Tainteds to be TRASH!!!
Greg
Not all us Constitutional Monarchists are batshit crazy like Tommy; he's a Welsh Communist, not a "Royal".
He's an extreme minority.
Greg
Your comment regarding The Queen is totally out of order. Please reconsider it as she is no whore! Her first marriage was to "Clintonista"; unfaithful arsehole. The King's first marriage was to a sad case but a loon nonetheless. They are very decent people.
Greg
"Here we have those born into wealth,"
More to the point they are born into POWER; they are the grubs like the Clintons, Bidens, and I hate to say it the Bushs and Kennedys. The GOOD thing about Trump is that though he is wealthy he understands the relationship between the worker and the Boss better than most; one does not thrive without the other. Of course that is under threat by forces that would destroy that relationship; they are called DemoKKrats and the Donor Class. They are NOT "We the People", and if you need a foreigner to tell you that then you may need to read more. I do think however that you DO know it already.
Greg
kyzr
Diamond Member
We had a series called "The Crown", which is the only resource I have to judge the royal family.
Elizabeth was a star, starting during WW2. She bent to rules later in life to protect "The Crown".
Most of the royals were disgusting entitled flawed creeps.
It showed that Charles was always hooked on older Camilla, even as he dutifully pursued Diana.
The fact that Charles fucked Camilla even though both were married with children, to me means that she is a whore, and Charles is a creep. Charles first marriage was a "fairy tale" until creepy Charles got his "wrinkle passion".
"The Crown" would be like trusting MSNBC and CNN talking about Trump. They were lefty leaning shitheads.We had a series called "The Crown", which is the only resource I have to judge the royal family.
Elizabeth was a star, starting during WW2. She bent to rules later in life to protect "The Crown".
Most of the royals were disgusting entitled flawed creeps.
It showed that Charles was always hooked on older Camilla, even as he dutifully pursued Diana.
The fact that Charles fucked Camilla even though both were married with children, to me means that she is a whore, and Charles is a creep. Charles first marriage was a "fairy tale" until creepy Charles got his "wrinkle passion".
"
Historical accuracy
[edit]The series has been criticised for its depiction of historical events, particularly from the fourth season onwards.[84] The programme's historical consultant, Robert Lacey, has stated that "there are two sorts of truth. There's historical truth, and then there's the larger truth about the past" and that "when history gets departed from, it's not done casually. It's done on the basis of wanting to convey a particular message that can only be conveyed by invention."[85] An example of such a departure is the season one plot in which the Queen and the government oppose Princess Margaret's desire to marry Peter Townsend, which would have required the monarch's permission under the Royal Marriages Act 1772; in reality, a plan was made to amend the Act to allow the marriage while removing Margaret and her children from the line of succession.[86]
The fourth season was criticised in the UK press as "inaccurate" and "anti-monarchy".[87][88][89] It was described as "fake history" by Simon Jenkins in The Guardian,[90] and the royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith stated that "because The Crown is such a lavish and expensive production, so beautifully acted and cleverly written, and so much attention has been paid to visual details about historical events, viewers are tricked into believing that what they are seeing actually happened".[91] The British culture secretary, Oliver Dowden, and the actress Judi Dench both suggested that the series should have a fiction warning at the beginning as a disclaimer, with Dench arguing that the show could mislead non-British audiences with its use of dramatic license.[92][93] In October 2022, Netflix added a disclaimer to the series's title synopsis page on its website and to the YouTube description of the trailer for season five, which describes it as a "fictional dramatisation" that was "inspired by real events".[94]"
The Crown (TV series) - Wikipedia
Greg
kyzr
Diamond Member
Once again, my point of reference was the series "The Crown".
Having the Windsors live in incredible opulence simply by being born would not fly here in the US.
The Clintons, Bidens, Bushes, and Kennedys do not have any special birthright other than name recognition.
Most of them are regular people unaffected by politics.
Democrats and the donor class, aka "oligarchs", are a totally separate topic for discussion.
1. Democrats prefer leftist billionaires like George Soros. They got burned by Kamala Harris when she lost their $1b investment.
2. Republican billionaires come in two flavors, Never-Trumpers like the Koch Brothers, and recent converts like Zuckerberg, Musk, and Bezos.
I know what I know, that everyone wants to buy power and influence, pick your pony and place your bets.
We had a series called "The Crown", which is the only resource I have to judge the royal family.
Elizabeth was a star, starting during WW2. She bent to rules later in life to protect "The Crown".
Most of the royals were disgusting entitled flawed creeps.
It showed that Charles was always hooked on older Camilla, even as he dutifully pursued Diana.
The fact that Charles fucked Camilla even though both were married with children, to me means that she is a whore, and Charles is a creep. Charles first marriage was a "fairy tale" until creepy Charles got his "wrinkle passion".
Charles first marriage was a "fairy tale" until creepy Charles got his "wrinkle passion".
That's not accurate at all. Charles should have Married Camilla first and foremost. It would have been quite acceptable even at the time. As we say here in Oz; Diana went troppo and was screwing a Major somewhere along the line. Charles and Camilla sought each other AFTER their marriages failed. Under Scottish law their marriage removed the TAINT of anything untoward. (Near enough for me). Meanwhile you don't call Melania a whore? Of course she isn't, and nor is Camilla. Please do NOT believe the media perspective; they're as biased and any US MSM lefurds!!
Greg
kyzr
Diamond Member
Okay, so every detail of every scene was not true, even call it "fiction".
There was enough truth in every episode to show that the "monarchy" and the "royals" are undeserving of such ...................struggling for words.........worship? adoration? undeserved wealth? the very concept of "royalty", makes no sense to Americans where "equality" and "fairness" permeate everyday life.
I saw many Brits, call them royalists, defend the royal family during their "racist" episodes with Harry and Meghan. I'll classify you as a "royalist". Not sure why, but you seem to support the royals. Fine. I'm not judging you, just saying makes no sense to me.
You're pretty much right of course but I object to you calling The Queen a whore. Picking up the pieces after failed marriages can be messy; see Trump himself and Hegseth for details. Just be aware that The Crown was written by CNN and MSNBC types; inaccurate.
" In October 2022, Netflix added a disclaimer to the series's title synopsis page on its website and to the YouTube description of the trailer for season five, which describes it as a "fictional dramatisation" that was "inspired by real events".["
In other words it was crap even if it was entertaining. It pandered to the anti-Windsor bias and narrative. I tried watching it but it was just too Smollett for me.
And Tommy is a little Welsh Commy shit!
Greg
It makes sense to me; my Father's Country was a constitutional Monarchy (Bulgaria) with a Tsar so it is understandable that stories of Crazy George the Third have become part and parcel of your own understanding, but please; The Republic gave us Obama, Biden and Carter as well as Clinton. Thank God (I do) that it also gave THE WORLD Trump. So all is forgiven.
Greg
".worship? adoration? "
lol. No; that's not it at all. The Crown is the INSTITUTIOPN that is in play. The "Royals" are more like stewards than Kings of Old. Of course it has its flaws, but The Crown endures. Royal approval is usually a sign of legitimacy. It is, of course, mostly ceremonial, but in Oz it was able to send a Government to an election (The People) for maladministration. I don't envy anything about them at all. I RERSPECT the Crown as you do The Institution of The Presidency. After all the President is the embodiment of the Will of the People. (Yes; even Biden, Dammit). In the Australian/English system the Crown is different but the Parliament actually runs the Government. The King is NOT Political.
Greg
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Homeland Security Doesn't Respect RCMP - How the RCMP, CBSA, and Trudeau Government Lost U.S. Trust in the Fentanyl Fight- Started by shockedcanadian
- Replies: 0
-
Han-Chinese social media applauds Ukraine's operation that destroyed 41 Moscow imperial aircraft..- Started by Litwin
- Replies: 1
-
-
Trump official who shut down counter-Russia agency has links to Kremlin
- Started by Crepitus
- Replies: 4
Latest Discussions
-
Trump official who shut down counter-Russia agency has links to Kremlin- Latest: TroglocratsRdumb
-
-
