The GOP agenda for the next few years.

[kyzr]

Charles first marriage was a "fairy tale" until creepy Charles got his "wrinkle passion".

That's not accurate at all. Charles should have Married Camilla first and foremost. It would have been quite acceptable even at the time. As we say here in Oz; Diana went troppo and was screwing a Major somewhere along the line. Charles and Camilla sought each other AFTER their marriages failed. Under Scottish law their marriage removed the TAINT of anything untoward. (Near enough for me). Meanwhile you don't call Melania a whore? Of course she isn't, and nor is Camilla. Please do NOT believe the media perspective; they're as biased as any US MSM lefturds!! Greg

I think that the series showed that Charles had a thing for Camilla and then Diana caught his eye. Then he got an itch for Camilla, then since he was a prince Camilla's husband let them do their thing, then Diana found out and Prince Phillip told her to get a lover etc. But the "root cause" of the mess was creepy Charles and his "consort" Camilla. (consort being a classier word than whore)

I think the series showed that the Queen would not allow Charles to marry Camilla to keep the lineage cricket?!
My memory is very flawed, but as I was watching, Charles and Camilla were more villainous/creepy than Diana.

 

[gtopa1]

Okay, so every detail of every scene was not true, even call it "fiction".
There was enough truth in every episode to show that the "monarchy" and the "royals" are undeserving of such ...................struggling for words.........worship? adoration? undeserved wealth? the very concept of "royalty", makes no sense to Americans where "equality" and "fairness" permeate everyday life.

I saw many Brits, call them royalists, defend the royal family during their "racist" episodes with Harry and Meghan. I'll classify you as a "royalist". Not sure why, but you seem to support the royals. Fine. I'm not judging you, just saying makes no sense to me.

Meghan is a Smollett; 'nuff said!! She was the media darling until she failed to understand Royal Protocols; very OLD ones. Yes; she pulled the race card and thus lost the good will that she had. Frankly I have no time for her...nor Randy Andy for that matter.

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

I think that the series showed that Charles had a thing for Camilla and then Diana caught his eye. Then he got an itch for Camilla, then since he was a prince Camilla's husband let them do their thing, then Diana found out and Prince Phillip told her to get a lover etc. But the "root cause" of the mess was creepy Charles and his "consort" Camilla. (consort being a classier word than whore)

I think the series showed that the Queen would not allow Charles to marry Camilla to keep the lineage cricket?!
My memory is very flawed, but as I was watching, Charles and Camilla were more villainous/creepy than Diana.

That I do think is fiction. I'm not sure why Camilla married the first time to a chap who was a womaniser. But Camilla was a useful scapegoat for Diana when she wanted OUT. I really think Diana, as much as we loved her as "Our" Princess, had a screw loose. Camilla's lineage was not a problem; she was "upper class", not that it matters. Nor was Diana's. She was after all a Spencer.

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

I think that the series showed that Charles had a thing for Camilla and then Diana caught his eye. Then he got an itch for Camilla, then since he was a prince Camilla's husband let them do their thing, then Diana found out and Prince Phillip told her to get a lover etc. But the "root cause" of the mess was creepy Charles and his "consort" Camilla. (consort being a classier word than whore)

I think the series showed that the Queen would not allow Charles to marry Camilla to keep the lineage cricket?!
My memory is very flawed, but as I was watching, Charles and Camilla were more villainous/creepy than Diana.

Would you trust Hollywood to do a Series "the Trumps"?? I'm sure one called "The Clintons" would be a fawning piece of fiction. lol

Greg

 

[kyzr]

That I do think is fiction. I'm not sure why Camilla married the first time to a chap who was a womaniser. But Camilla was a useful scapegoat for Diana when she wanted OUT. I really think Diana, as much as we loved her as "Our" Princess, had a screw loose. Camilla's lineage was not a problem; she was "upper class", not that it matters. Nor was Diana's. She was after all a Spencer. Greg

1. If Charles was only interested in Camilla Diana felt ignored in a loveless marriage, that is not crazy to want out, and Camilla wasn't a scapegoat, she was in-fact the reason.

2. Eventually she wanted out but only after many futile attempts at saving her marriage. As I said, Charles was the problem, not Diana.

 

[gtopa1]

1. If Charles was only interested in Camilla Diana felt ignored in a loveless marriage, that is not crazy to want out, and Camilla wasn't a scapegoat, she was in-fact the reason.

2. Eventually she wanted out but only after many futile attempts at saving her marriage. As I said, Charles was the problem, not Diana.

Well that was according to that TV show thingy. Did you cry when you heard Diana died? I did, but from what I knew at the time Diana was basically not exactly fully hinged.

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

Crazy reactions from Hollyweird?? (It's LONG)



Greg

 

[Tommy Tainant]

1. If Charles was only interested in Camilla Diana felt ignored in a loveless marriage, that is not crazy to want out, and Camilla wasn't a scapegoat, she was in-fact the reason.

2. Eventually she wanted out but only after many futile attempts at saving her marriage. As I said, Charles was the problem, not Diana.

You colonials are obsessed by royalty. Now you have your own royal family.

 

[westwall]

Tthe big question is how long before maga is able to open their camps for re - educating Gays.
The mid term losses should stomy that so they have 2 years to get it done.

MAGA doesn't give a tinkers damn if you're a poof, tainty. We only care if you go after children.

 

[kyzr]

Well that was according to that TV show thingy. Did you cry when you heard Diana died? I did, but from what I knew at the time Diana was basically not exactly fully hinged. Greg

No I didn't cry. I have no emotional connection to British palace intrigue.
Diana was in love with Dodi Fayed, so not sure why you say she was "unhinged", that sounds like "royal propaganda" to me.
If creepy Charles would have been "normal" they would have lived happily ever after, but he's not normal, preferring older Camilla to beautiful Diana.

 

[kyzr]

You colonials are obsessed by royalty. Now you have your own royal family.

No worries Tommy. We don't have "royals", we just have "politicians".
The MSM always fawns over the 1st family, except when they are Republicans, then its a 95% negative bias.
Not sure why gtopa1 is so protective of Charles and calls Diana "crazy/unhinged"?
IMHO Charles is a creep, and Diana was amazingly beautiful and charming, amiwrong?