PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #21
11. What the heck is this Liberal organ, the New Yorker Magazine, objecting to??????
Religion.
A central bugaboo of the Left: the worship of anything but government.
“…there’s something especially distasteful about Chick-fil-A, which has sought to portray itself as better than other fast food: cleaner, gentler, and more ethical, with its poultry slightly healthier than the mystery meat of burgers. Its politics, its décor, and its commercial-evangelical messaging are inflected with this suburban piety.
The restaurant’s corporate purpose still begins with the words “to glorify God,” and that proselytism thrums below the surface of the Fulton Street restaurant, which has the ersatz homespun ambiance of a megachurch.” Chick-fil-A’s Creepy Infiltration of New York City | The New Yorker
It’s a restaurant chain…..a fast food restaurant.
And the author is attacking it because the management is openly religious.
This is what Liberalism has become, the scion of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin.
Religion.
A central bugaboo of the Left: the worship of anything but government.
“…there’s something especially distasteful about Chick-fil-A, which has sought to portray itself as better than other fast food: cleaner, gentler, and more ethical, with its poultry slightly healthier than the mystery meat of burgers. Its politics, its décor, and its commercial-evangelical messaging are inflected with this suburban piety.
The restaurant’s corporate purpose still begins with the words “to glorify God,” and that proselytism thrums below the surface of the Fulton Street restaurant, which has the ersatz homespun ambiance of a megachurch.” Chick-fil-A’s Creepy Infiltration of New York City | The New Yorker
It’s a restaurant chain…..a fast food restaurant.
And the author is attacking it because the management is openly religious.
This is what Liberalism has become, the scion of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin.
Last edited: