The General Who Died Twice

"Whenever I see you (sic) posts,...."


'Whenever I see YOUR posts,'.....you imbecile.


English is my second language, truth my first love.

Two ways we differ,huh? (sic)


"Stalin wanted to be sure that a man with Patton's understanding of the aims of the communists were (sic) eliminated."

"Stalin wanted to be sure that a man with Patton's understanding of the aims of the communists WAS eliminated."...you imbecile

'Two ways we differ,huh? (sic)"

"Two ways we differ, huh?"....space after the comma, imbecile.

You wouldn't know truth if it knocked on your door, bit you in the arse and said hello in 75 different languages...



์ œ ๋ฌธ๋ฒ• ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋Š” ์™ธ๊ตญ์–ด์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๊ท€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ท€ํ•˜์˜ ๋ชจ๊ตญ์–ด๋กœ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
 
์ œ ๋ฌธ๋ฒ• ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋Š” ์™ธ๊ตญ์–ด์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๊ท€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ท€ํ•˜์˜ ๋ชจ๊ตญ์–ด๋กœ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Doesn't matter. Let her without sin cast the first stone.
Don't care if English is your first, second or third language, if you are going to criticise others, your execution better be perfect.
 
a. You have been mislead about the Nazis and the Communists: both are Leftist, both were birthed from Karl Marx, and the Communists, by every metric, were the worse and more dangerous. As the Democrat Party mirrors all of the aims of the communists, they need alter the publicโ€™s perception of the two socialist entities.
And are you ever right about that! WWII was 100% Democrat-on-Democrat bloody red-light-district stupidity. The "concentration camps" on one side and the "gulags" on the other side. We should never, ever have become involved in that war from the U.S. side. It ended up costing us our freedom as Nazis got into our government through Operation Paperclip, and the Commies got in around the time of the Vietnam War.
 
์ œ ๋ฌธ๋ฒ• ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋Š” ์™ธ๊ตญ์–ด์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๊ท€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ท€ํ•˜์˜ ๋ชจ๊ตญ์–ด๋กœ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Doesn't matter. Let her without sin cast the first stone.
Don't care if English is your first, second or third language, if you are going to criticise others, your execution better be perfect.



I know I'm not perfect....but so close it's scary.
 
a. You have been mislead about the Nazis and the Communists: both are Leftist, both were birthed from Karl Marx, and the Communists, by every metric, were the worse and more dangerous. As the Democrat Party mirrors all of the aims of the communists, they need alter the publicโ€™s perception of the two socialist entities.
And are you ever right about that! WWII was 100% Democrat-on-Democrat bloody red-light-district stupidity. The "concentration camps" on one side and the "gulags" on the other side. We should never, ever have become involved in that war from the U.S. side. It ended up costing us our freedom as Nazis got into our government through Operation Paperclip, and the Commies got in around the time of the Vietnam War.




Hanson Baldwin, military critic of the New York Times, declares in his book, "Great Mistakes of the War:" 'There is no doubt whatsoever that it would have been to the interest of Britain, the United States, and the world to have allowed and indeed to have encouraged-the world's two great dictatorships to fight each other to a frazzle.'

Baldwin writes that the United States put itself "in the role-at times a disgraceful role-of fearful suppliant and propitiating ally, anxious at nearly any cost to keep Russia fighting. In retrospect, how stupid!"




George Kennanโ€™s view of Rooseveltโ€™s performance during the war
is considerably harsher than Harrimanโ€™s. After commenting bitterly on the โ€œinexcusable body of ignorance about the Russian Communist movement, about the history of its diplomacy, about what had happened in the purges, and about what had been going on in Poland and the Baltic States,โ€ Kennan turns more directly to FDR alone:

I also have in mind FDRs evident conviction that Stalin, while perhaps a somewhat difficult customer, was only, after all, a person like any other person; that the reason we hadnโ€™t been able to get along with him in the past was that we had never really had anyone with the proper personality and the proper qualities of sympathy and imagination to deal with him, that he had been snubbed all along by the arrogant conservatives of the Western capitals; and that if only he could be exposed to the persuasive charms of someone like FDR himself, ideological preconceptions would melt and Russiaโ€™s cooperation with the West could be easily arranged.

For these assumptions there were no grounds whatsover; and they were of a puerility that was unworthy of a statesman of FDRs stature.
http://www.mmisi.org/ma/30_02/nisbet.pdf
 
So you admit you are a commie fascist who wants to see American Freedoms crushed, and Americans Subjugated.

Glad you finally came out of the closet.


Heil Biden is still hiding in his bunker, and still illegitimate as Hitler was in 1933 no matter what kind of temper tantrum you throw.

What freedoms have you lost?

In 1933 Hitler purged the German government of Communists, Socialists, Democrats and Jews.
 
What freedoms have you lost?

In 1933 Hitler purged the German government of Communists, Socialists, Democrats and Jews.


Hitler was a socialist, learned his doctrines from Karl Marx......just like the current Democrat Party.


You didn't know that????
 
See the Enabling Act of 1933.


See the socialist program of your favorite party:


Government spending as a percentage of GDP averaged around 40% pre-war. Additionally (at least in the beginning) 80% of the budget was spent on social programs, not the hallmark of an "evil, right wing, capitalist economy." Sign in



-------------------------------------------------------------

Workers Welfare Programs:


In the best passage of Government largess, the Nazi regime fostered a purified liberal concept to enhance the living standard of German citizens across all segments of society. In order to stimulate the spirit of integrity, comradeship and happiness, Adolf Hitler fanned numerous programs and instituted strict rules for officials to carry them in eternal way.

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.






1933-1945: In 1933 Hitler disbands the labor movement and strips Jews of citizenship. Jews, dissidents, and other minorities are put in concentration camps, where they are forced to work or killed outright. The Reich centralizes social programs and education as a means of control. The regime extends health insurance to retirees in 1941, and expands health care and maternity leave the following year. Commanding Heights : Germany | on PBS



During the 12 years of Hitlerโ€™s Third Reich, the National Socialists expanded and extended the welfare state to the point where over 17 million German citizens were receiving assistance under the auspices of the National Socialist People's Welfare (NSV) by 1939, an agency that had projected a powerful image of caring and support. Welfare state - Wikipedia







The Nazi rule under Adolf Hitler in the 1930s and 1940s led to an improvement in medical care and old age provision largely financed by high taxes on the wealthy, and theft from Jews and the people of the conquered territories (Aly 2007, 7). The Viability of the European Social Model: The German Welfare State and Labor Market Reform











The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the rรฉgime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a โ€œpeopleโ€™s communityโ€ where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated โ€œ8,000 day-nurseriesโ€ by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a โ€œwide variety of other facilities.โ€[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible โ€œfor travellersโ€™ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; โ€˜supportโ€™ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.โ€

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans โ€œthe highest possible standard of living.โ€ National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hitlerโ€™s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, by Gรถtz Aly,

While underemphasized by modern historians, this socialism was stressed in many contemporaneous accounts of fascism, especially by libertarian thinkers. F.A. Hayek famously dedicated The Road to Serfdom to โ€œthe socialists of all partiesโ€โ€”that is, Labourites, Bolsheviks, and National Socialists.



Ludwig von Mises agreed, arguing in 1944 that โ€œboth Russia and Germany are right in calling their systems socialist.โ€

The Nazis themselves regarded the left-right convergence as integral to understanding fascism. Adolf Eichmann viewed National Socialism and communism as โ€œquasi-siblings,โ€ explaining in his memoirs that he โ€œinclined towards the left and emphasized socialist aspects every bit as much as nationalist ones.โ€ As late as 1944, Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels publicly celebrated โ€œour socialism,โ€ reminding his war-weary subjects that Germany โ€œalone [has] the best social welfare measures.โ€ Contrast this, he advised, with the Jews, who were the very โ€œincarnation of capitalism.โ€


Using a farrago of previously unpublished statistics, Aly describes in detail a social system larded with benefits โ€”open only to Aryan comrades, naturally.

According to Gรถtz Alyโ€™s Hitlerโ€™s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, most previous treatments of German complicity in genocide overlook a significant aspect of Nazi rule. Aly, a historian at the Fritz Bauer Institut in Frankfurt and the author of more than a dozen books on fascism, urges us to follow the money, arguing that the Nazis maintained popular supportโ€”a necessary precondition for the โ€œfinal solutionโ€โ€”not because of terror or ideological affinity but through a simple system of โ€œplunder,โ€ โ€œbribery,โ€ and a generous welfare state.




To โ€œachieve a truly socialist division of personal assets,โ€ he writes, Hitler implemented a variety of interventionist economic policies, including price and rent controls, exorbitant corporate taxes, frequent โ€œpolemics against landlords,โ€ subsidies to German farmers as protection โ€œagainst the vagaries of weather and the world market,โ€ and harsh taxes on capital gains, which Hitler himself had denounced as โ€œeffortless income.โ€

โ€œThe Nazi leadership did not transform the majority of Germans into ideological fanatics who were convinced that they were the master race,โ€ Aly concludes. โ€œInstead it succeeded in making them well-fed parasites.โ€

Hitlerโ€™s Beneficiaries demonstrates a correlation between moral collapse and government largess.

While Alyโ€™s impressive economic history succeeds in reminding readers that Bolshevism and Nazism were, in the words of historian Richard Pipes, both โ€œheresies of socialism,โ€ that service is ultimately overshadowed by a needlessly radical conclusion." Hitler's Handouts





I never object to eviscerating your each and every post.



Bet you wish you had an education, huh?
 
See the socialist program of your favorite party:


Government spending as a percentage of GDP averaged around 40% pre-war. Additionally (at least in the beginning) 80% of the budget was spent on social programs, not the hallmark of an "evil, right wing, capitalist economy." Sign in



-------------------------------------------------------------

Workers Welfare Programs:


In the best passage of Government largess, the Nazi regime fostered a purified liberal concept to enhance the living standard of German citizens across all segments of society. In order to stimulate the spirit of integrity, comradeship and happiness, Adolf Hitler fanned numerous programs and instituted strict rules for officials to carry them in eternal way.

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.






1933-1945: In 1933 Hitler disbands the labor movement and strips Jews of citizenship. Jews, dissidents, and other minorities are put in concentration camps, where they are forced to work or killed outright. The Reich centralizes social programs and education as a means of control. The regime extends health insurance to retirees in 1941, and expands health care and maternity leave the following year. Commanding Heights : Germany | on PBS



During the 12 years of Hitlerโ€™s Third Reich, the National Socialists expanded and extended the welfare state to the point where over 17 million German citizens were receiving assistance under the auspices of the National Socialist People's Welfare (NSV) by 1939, an agency that had projected a powerful image of caring and support. Welfare state - Wikipedia







The Nazi rule under Adolf Hitler in the 1930s and 1940s led to an improvement in medical care and old age provision largely financed by high taxes on the wealthy, and theft from Jews and the people of the conquered territories (Aly 2007, 7). The Viability of the European Social Model: The German Welfare State and Labor Market Reform











The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the rรฉgime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a โ€œpeopleโ€™s communityโ€ where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated โ€œ8,000 day-nurseriesโ€ by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a โ€œwide variety of other facilities.โ€[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible โ€œfor travellersโ€™ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; โ€˜supportโ€™ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.โ€

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans โ€œthe highest possible standard of living.โ€ National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hitlerโ€™s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, by Gรถtz Aly,

While underemphasized by modern historians, this socialism was stressed in many contemporaneous accounts of fascism, especially by libertarian thinkers. F.A. Hayek famously dedicated The Road to Serfdom to โ€œthe socialists of all partiesโ€โ€”that is, Labourites, Bolsheviks, and National Socialists.



Ludwig von Mises agreed, arguing in 1944 that โ€œboth Russia and Germany are right in calling their systems socialist.โ€

The Nazis themselves regarded the left-right convergence as integral to understanding fascism. Adolf Eichmann viewed National Socialism and communism as โ€œquasi-siblings,โ€ explaining in his memoirs that he โ€œinclined towards the left and emphasized socialist aspects every bit as much as nationalist ones.โ€ As late as 1944, Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels publicly celebrated โ€œour socialism,โ€ reminding his war-weary subjects that Germany โ€œalone [has] the best social welfare measures.โ€ Contrast this, he advised, with the Jews, who were the very โ€œincarnation of capitalism.โ€


Using a farrago of previously unpublished statistics, Aly describes in detail a social system larded with benefits โ€”open only to Aryan comrades, naturally.

According to Gรถtz Alyโ€™s Hitlerโ€™s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, most previous treatments of German complicity in genocide overlook a significant aspect of Nazi rule. Aly, a historian at the Fritz Bauer Institut in Frankfurt and the author of more than a dozen books on fascism, urges us to follow the money, arguing that the Nazis maintained popular supportโ€”a necessary precondition for the โ€œfinal solutionโ€โ€”not because of terror or ideological affinity but through a simple system of โ€œplunder,โ€ โ€œbribery,โ€ and a generous welfare state.




To โ€œachieve a truly socialist division of personal assets,โ€ he writes, Hitler implemented a variety of interventionist economic policies, including price and rent controls, exorbitant corporate taxes, frequent โ€œpolemics against landlords,โ€ subsidies to German farmers as protection โ€œagainst the vagaries of weather and the world market,โ€ and harsh taxes on capital gains, which Hitler himself had denounced as โ€œeffortless income.โ€

โ€œThe Nazi leadership did not transform the majority of Germans into ideological fanatics who were convinced that they were the master race,โ€ Aly concludes. โ€œInstead it succeeded in making them well-fed parasites.โ€

Hitlerโ€™s Beneficiaries demonstrates a correlation between moral collapse and government largess.

While Alyโ€™s impressive economic history succeeds in reminding readers that Bolshevism and Nazism were, in the words of historian Richard Pipes, both โ€œheresies of socialism,โ€ that service is ultimately overshadowed by a needlessly radical conclusion." Hitler's Handouts





I never object to eviscerating your each and every post.



Bet you wish you had an education, huh?

I do have an education.

The Enabling Act | Holocaust Encyclopedia
The Enabling Act allowed the Reich government to issue laws without the consent of Germanyโ€™s parliament, laying the foundation for the complete Nazification of German society. The law was passed on March 23, 1933, and published the following day. Its full name was the โ€œLaw to Remedy the Distress of the People and the Reich.โ€
 
I do have an education.

The Enabling Act | Holocaust Encyclopedia
The Enabling Act allowed the Reich government to issue laws without the consent of Germanyโ€™s parliament, laying the foundation for the complete Nazification of German society. The law was passed on March 23, 1933, and published the following day. Its full name was the โ€œLaw to Remedy the Distress of the People and the Reich.โ€


Reality is defined by actions, not by words.


You should have learned that at mommy's knee, you moron.
 
Reality is defined by actions, not by words.


You should have learned that at mommy's knee, you moron.

The reaality is that Hitler used the enabling act to put socialists, communists, democrats and Jews in the newly built Dachau.
 
The reaality is that Hitler used the enabling act to put socialists, communists, democrats and Jews in the newly built Dachau.


Hitler was as much a socialist as the Bolsheviks, the Democrats, and you.

I provided the facts, with links to check, and you, the embarrassed "is not, isssssssssss noooooottttttttttt!!!!!"


I love it.


Post it again, and I'll rip you a new one, again.
 
Hitler was as much a socialist as the Bolsheviks, the Democrats, and you.

I provided the facts, with links to check, and you, the embarrassed "is not, isssssssssss noooooottttttttttt!!!!!"


I love it.


Post it again, and I'll rip you a new one, again.

You poor thing.. Is this all you have in your life?
 
No he wasn't. What you know about history could be put on a postage stamp. He was a totalitarian dictator. In the same mould as Trump.


I know you're a moron, and I shouldn't keep pointing it out......but.....imagine.....had you ever read a book....

...a written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers.....


....then you might have known that Hitler was as much a socialist as the Bolsheviks, Democrats....and you are.



Government spending as a percentage of GDP averaged around 40% pre-war. Additionally (at least in the beginning) 80% of the budget was spent on social programs, not the hallmark of an "evil, right wing, capitalist economy." Sign in



-------------------------------------------------------------

Workers Welfare Programs:


In the best passage of Government largess, the Nazi regime fostered a purified liberal concept to enhance the living standard of German citizens across all segments of society. In order to stimulate the spirit of integrity, comradeship and happiness, Adolf Hitler fanned numerous programs and instituted strict rules for officials to carry them in eternal way.

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.






1933-1945: In 1933 Hitler disbands the labor movement and strips Jews of citizenship. Jews, dissidents, and other minorities are put in concentration camps, where they are forced to work or killed outright. The Reich centralizes social programs and education as a means of control. The regime extends health insurance to retirees in 1941, and expands health care and maternity leave the following year. Commanding Heights : Germany | on PBS



During the 12 years of Hitlerโ€™s Third Reich, the National Socialists expanded and extended the welfare state to the point where over 17 million German citizens were receiving assistance under the auspices of the National Socialist People's Welfare (NSV) by 1939, an agency that had projected a powerful image of caring and support. Welfare state - Wikipedia







The Nazi rule under Adolf Hitler in the 1930s and 1940s led to an improvement in medical care and old age provision largely financed by high taxes on the wealthy, and theft from Jews and the people of the conquered territories (Aly 2007, 7). The Viability of the European Social Model: The German Welfare State and Labor Market Reform











The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the rรฉgime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a โ€œpeopleโ€™s communityโ€ where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated โ€œ8,000 day-nurseriesโ€ by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a โ€œwide variety of other facilities.โ€[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible โ€œfor travellersโ€™ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; โ€˜supportโ€™ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.โ€

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans โ€œthe highest possible standard of living.โ€ National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hitlerโ€™s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, by Gรถtz Aly,

While underemphasized by modern historians, this socialism was stressed in many contemporaneous accounts of fascism, especially by libertarian thinkers. F.A. Hayek famously dedicated The Road to Serfdom to โ€œthe socialists of all partiesโ€โ€”that is, Labourites, Bolsheviks, and National Socialists.



Ludwig von Mises agreed, arguing in 1944 that โ€œboth Russia and Germany are right in calling their systems socialist.โ€

The Nazis themselves regarded the left-right convergence as integral to understanding fascism. Adolf Eichmann viewed National Socialism and communism as โ€œquasi-siblings,โ€ explaining in his memoirs that he โ€œinclined towards the left and emphasized socialist aspects every bit as much as nationalist ones.โ€ As late as 1944, Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels publicly celebrated โ€œour socialism,โ€ reminding his war-weary subjects that Germany โ€œalone [has] the best social welfare measures.โ€ Contrast this, he advised, with the Jews, who were the very โ€œincarnation of capitalism.โ€


Using a farrago of previously unpublished statistics, Aly describes in detail a social system larded with benefits โ€”open only to Aryan comrades, naturally.

According to Gรถtz Alyโ€™s Hitlerโ€™s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, most previous treatments of German complicity in genocide overlook a significant aspect of Nazi rule. Aly, a historian at the Fritz Bauer Institut in Frankfurt and the author of more than a dozen books on fascism, urges us to follow the money, arguing that the Nazis maintained popular supportโ€”a necessary precondition for the โ€œfinal solutionโ€โ€”not because of terror or ideological affinity but through a simple system of โ€œplunder,โ€ โ€œbribery,โ€ and a generous welfare state.




To โ€œachieve a truly socialist division of personal assets,โ€ he writes, Hitler implemented a variety of interventionist economic policies, including price and rent controls, exorbitant corporate taxes, frequent โ€œpolemics against landlords,โ€ subsidies to German farmers as protection โ€œagainst the vagaries of weather and the world market,โ€ and harsh taxes on capital gains, which Hitler himself had denounced as โ€œeffortless income.โ€

โ€œThe Nazi leadership did not transform the majority of Germans into ideological fanatics who were convinced that they were the master race,โ€ Aly concludes. โ€œInstead it succeeded in making them well-fed parasites.โ€

Hitlerโ€™s Beneficiaries demonstrates a correlation between moral collapse and government largess.

While Alyโ€™s impressive economic history succeeds in reminding readers that Bolshevism and Nazism were, in the words of historian Richard Pipes, both โ€œheresies of socialism,โ€ that service is ultimately overshadowed by a needlessly radical conclusion." Hitler's Handouts



Now......what was that about a 'postage stamp'......you dunce.
 
I know you're a moron, and I shouldn't keep pointing it out......but.....imagine.....had you ever read a book....

...a written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers.....


....then you might have known that Hitler was as much a socialist as the Bolsheviks, Democrats....and you are.



Government spending as a percentage of GDP averaged around 40% pre-war. Additionally (at least in the beginning) 80% of the budget was spent on social programs, not the hallmark of an "evil, right wing, capitalist economy." Sign in



-------------------------------------------------------------

Workers Welfare Programs:


In the best passage of Government largess, the Nazi regime fostered a purified liberal concept to enhance the living standard of German citizens across all segments of society. In order to stimulate the spirit of integrity, comradeship and happiness, Adolf Hitler fanned numerous programs and instituted strict rules for officials to carry them in eternal way.

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.






1933-1945: In 1933 Hitler disbands the labor movement and strips Jews of citizenship. Jews, dissidents, and other minorities are put in concentration camps, where they are forced to work or killed outright. The Reich centralizes social programs and education as a means of control. The regime extends health insurance to retirees in 1941, and expands health care and maternity leave the following year. Commanding Heights : Germany | on PBS



During the 12 years of Hitlerโ€™s Third Reich, the National Socialists expanded and extended the welfare state to the point where over 17 million German citizens were receiving assistance under the auspices of the National Socialist People's Welfare (NSV) by 1939, an agency that had projected a powerful image of caring and support. Welfare state - Wikipedia







The Nazi rule under Adolf Hitler in the 1930s and 1940s led to an improvement in medical care and old age provision largely financed by high taxes on the wealthy, and theft from Jews and the people of the conquered territories (Aly 2007, 7). The Viability of the European Social Model: The German Welfare State and Labor Market Reform











The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the rรฉgime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a โ€œpeopleโ€™s communityโ€ where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated โ€œ8,000 day-nurseriesโ€ by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a โ€œwide variety of other facilities.โ€[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible โ€œfor travellersโ€™ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; โ€˜supportโ€™ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.โ€

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans โ€œthe highest possible standard of living.โ€ National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hitlerโ€™s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, by Gรถtz Aly,

While underemphasized by modern historians, this socialism was stressed in many contemporaneous accounts of fascism, especially by libertarian thinkers. F.A. Hayek famously dedicated The Road to Serfdom to โ€œthe socialists of all partiesโ€โ€”that is, Labourites, Bolsheviks, and National Socialists.



Ludwig von Mises agreed, arguing in 1944 that โ€œboth Russia and Germany are right in calling their systems socialist.โ€

The Nazis themselves regarded the left-right convergence as integral to understanding fascism. Adolf Eichmann viewed National Socialism and communism as โ€œquasi-siblings,โ€ explaining in his memoirs that he โ€œinclined towards the left and emphasized socialist aspects every bit as much as nationalist ones.โ€ As late as 1944, Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels publicly celebrated โ€œour socialism,โ€ reminding his war-weary subjects that Germany โ€œalone [has] the best social welfare measures.โ€ Contrast this, he advised, with the Jews, who were the very โ€œincarnation of capitalism.โ€


Using a farrago of previously unpublished statistics, Aly describes in detail a social system larded with benefits โ€”open only to Aryan comrades, naturally.

According to Gรถtz Alyโ€™s Hitlerโ€™s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, most previous treatments of German complicity in genocide overlook a significant aspect of Nazi rule. Aly, a historian at the Fritz Bauer Institut in Frankfurt and the author of more than a dozen books on fascism, urges us to follow the money, arguing that the Nazis maintained popular supportโ€”a necessary precondition for the โ€œfinal solutionโ€โ€”not because of terror or ideological affinity but through a simple system of โ€œplunder,โ€ โ€œbribery,โ€ and a generous welfare state.




To โ€œachieve a truly socialist division of personal assets,โ€ he writes, Hitler implemented a variety of interventionist economic policies, including price and rent controls, exorbitant corporate taxes, frequent โ€œpolemics against landlords,โ€ subsidies to German farmers as protection โ€œagainst the vagaries of weather and the world market,โ€ and harsh taxes on capital gains, which Hitler himself had denounced as โ€œeffortless income.โ€

โ€œThe Nazi leadership did not transform the majority of Germans into ideological fanatics who were convinced that they were the master race,โ€ Aly concludes. โ€œInstead it succeeded in making them well-fed parasites.โ€

Hitlerโ€™s Beneficiaries demonstrates a correlation between moral collapse and government largess.

While Alyโ€™s impressive economic history succeeds in reminding readers that Bolshevism and Nazism were, in the words of historian Richard Pipes, both โ€œheresies of socialism,โ€ that service is ultimately overshadowed by a needlessly radical conclusion." Hitler's Handouts



Now......what was that about a 'postage stamp'......you dunce.
No, that was just a cut and past job. And hey, we can all do that...


And thanks for posting this...and proving my point....he was a totalitarian dictator. Nothing more, nothing less.

Yeah, the Nazis were socialists like East Germany (DDR - hey thicko the second D stood for Democratic) and the NKDP (again thicko, the D stands for Democratic) are/were democracies.
 
No, that was just a cut and past job. And hey, we can all do that...


And thanks for posting this...and proving my point....he was a totalitarian dictator. Nothing more, nothing less.

Yeah, the Nazis were socialists like East Germany (DDR - hey thicko the second D stood for Democratic) and the NKDP (again thicko, the D stands for Democratic) are/were democracies.



I provided the facts, the actual socialist program of your favorite German party.



I understand that, at your age, alter your views to align with the facts, the truth, is not an easy task.

BTW.....the WaPo is a Democrat house organ, you dunce.


Both Hitler and the Bolsheviks took their doctrines from Karl Marx.


Same as you and the Democrat Party.


You didn't know that????


So many thing you don't know.


livingscoop.com domain is for sale | Buy with Epik.com

livingscoop.com domain is for sale | Buy with Epik.com





"The Soviet Story," an award winning documentary clarifying the close and personal attachments of Hitler's Nazis and Stalin's Communists.

"Soviet Story" is the most powerful antidote yet to the sanitisation of the past. The film is gripping, audacious and uncompromising. [...] The main aim of the film is to show the close connectionsโ€”philosophical, political and organisationalโ€”between the Nazi and Soviet systems." Telling the Soviet story


A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the film)

Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. (18:30)

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.




NEXT!!!
 
I provided the facts, the actual socialist program of your favorite German party.



I understand that, at your age, alter your views to align with the facts, the truth, is not an easy task.

BTW.....the WaPo is a Democrat house organ, you dunce.


Both Hitler and the Bolsheviks took their doctrines from Karl Marx.


Same as you and the Democrat Party.


You didn't know that????


So many thing you don't know.


livingscoop.com domain is for sale | Buy with Epik.com

livingscoop.com domain is for sale | Buy with Epik.com





"The Soviet Story," an award winning documentary clarifying the close and personal attachments of Hitler's Nazis and Stalin's Communists.

"Soviet Story" is the most powerful antidote yet to the sanitisation of the past. The film is gripping, audacious and uncompromising. [...] The main aim of the film is to show the close connectionsโ€”philosophical, political and organisationalโ€”between the Nazi and Soviet systems." Telling the Soviet story


A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the film)

Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. (18:30)

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.




NEXT!!!
So you quote fringe people and fringe websites, and you take that as a win.

Anybody who calls the WaPo a democratic house organ can never be taken seriously. I get sick of all you Deplorable losers labelling institutions that have grand reputations, while elevating scum like Trump or Moscow Mitch, just to suit your own warped political agenda.

Sorry, Queen Deplorable, go peddle your BS to the gullible mooks who keep on sending Trump money to help with his 'defence' fund.
 

Forum List

Back
Top