The Four Main Fails of AGW

[jc456]

The CO2 causes the warming,

prove it. no chart proves it as frank says. CO2 follows temperature. always has. Prove C02 can warm something. got that experiment? mythbusters was a bust. got any others? you know, ones that actually worked?

The piece for me that hasn't been mentioned is that C02 existed in the mythbuster's control box in their experiment and that C02 didn't warm up the box. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. It should, it is absorbing and reemitting correct? So, if C02 warms, that box should warm up.

 

[mamooth]

This is well known science. Has been for centuries in the case of the SUN.

Given that the sun has been cooling since the early seventies, someone would have to be either an imbecile or a liar to say such a delusional thing.

Westwall, of course, is both. He's shockingly stupid, and he's willing to tell any lie to further the aims of his Stalinist party.

 

[mamooth]

The CO2 causes the warming,

prove it.

Again, hundreds of references in the HITRAN database quantify the absorption spectrum of CO2. This isn't a debate. You're just a cult kook.

no chart proves it as frank says. CO2 follows temperature. always has.

Obviously false, since temperature is now following CO2.

And again, CO2 following temp is totally consistent with CO2 being both a forcing and a feedback. Given how you fail so hard at the basics, you shoulnd't be bothering the grownups.

The piece for me that hasn't been mentioned is that C02 existed in the mythbuster's control box in their experiment and that C02 didn't warm up the box.

What are you babbling about? The video flat out stated the temperature was higher in the boxes with increased CO2 or methane.

What's the point in telling such an obvious and stupid lie? Everyone already knows you'll lie for TheCult, so theres' no need to keep reinforcing that point.

 

[mamooth]

All of the AGW Cult believes the Sun has no effect on the changing climate. 0%

An outright lie from a proud Stalinist.

It's not debatable that the deniers on this thread are lying. For example, here's the AR5 forcing chart. Note that solar forcing is included there.

Also note that there is no "It's okay to lie to own the libtards" clause in the ten commandments. If you deniers don't shape up, you'll roast in the afterlife too.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

All of the AGW Cult believes the Sun has no effect on the changing climate. 0%

An outright lie from a proud Stalinist.

It's not debatable that the deniers on this thread are lying. For example, here's the AR5 forcing chart. Note that solar forcing is included there.

Also note that there is no "It's okay to lie to own the libtards" clause in the ten commandments. If you deniers don't shape up, you'll roast in the afterlife too.

CO2 1.68, the Big Yellow thing in the Sky .05

LOL!!

Thank you for proving my point

Albedo is negative? LOL! OMG!! The ChiComs spewing soot lowers Albedo

LOL!!

 

[jc456]

And again, CO2 following temp is totally consistent with CO2 being both a forcing and a feedback. Given how you fail so hard at the basics, you shoulnd't be bothering the grownups

Link

 

[jc456]

What are you babbling about? The video flat out stated the temperature was higher in the boxes with increased CO2 or methane

Hahaha hahaha all three should have then

 

[CrusaderFrank]

All of the AGW Cult believes the Sun has no effect on the changing climate. 0%

An outright lie from a proud Stalinist.

It's not debatable that the deniers on this thread are lying. For example, here's the AR5 forcing chart. Note that solar forcing is included there.

Also note that there is no "It's okay to lie to own the libtards" clause in the ten commandments. If you deniers don't shape up, you'll roast in the afterlife too.

450,000 year side by side data set showing CO2 LAGGING temperature on the increase and decrease, but suddenly in 1860, CO2 radically changed and now LEADS THE CHARGE!!!

What is different about modern CO2?

 

[mamooth]

What are you babbling about? The video flat out stated the temperature was higher in the boxes with increased CO2 or methane

Hahaha hahaha all three should have then

In your special stupid-dimension, sure. Back in reality, only the cases with elevated greenhas gas levels had higher temperatures

 

[mamooth]

What is different about modern CO2?

Nothing. You're just failing hilariously at basic logic and physics.

You don't see any normal person babbling that modern CO2 is magically special. That sort of stupid only comes from you.

 

[jc456]

What are you babbling about? The video flat out stated the temperature was higher in the boxes with increased CO2 or methane

Hahaha hahaha all three should have then

In your special stupid-dimension, sure. Back in reality, only the cases with elevated greenhas gas levels had higher temperatures

Oh fk no, A closed box, C02 should have caused an increase of temperature if you were right, it didn’t oops, temperature drives C02

 

[jc456]

What is different about modern CO2?

Nothing. You're just failing hilariously at basic logic and physics.

You don't see any normal person babbling that modern CO2 is magically special. That sort of stupid only comes from you.

Just you and Crick!

 

[mamooth]

Oh fk no, I closed box, C02 should have caused an increase of temperature

And it did.

Are you really this 'effin dense, or are you lying deliberately?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What is different about modern CO2?

Nothing. You're just failing hilariously at basic logic and physics.

You don't see any normal person babbling that modern CO2 is magically special. That sort of stupid only comes from you.

Please describe the changes that occurred in CO2 in 1860 that now cause it to DRIVE temperature

 

[jc456]

Oh fk no, I closed box, C02 should have caused an increase of temperature

And it did.

Are you really this 'effin dense, or are you lying deliberately?

Nope, the control box should have increased as well like I said. It didn’t, blew up the experiment

 

[mamooth]

Please describe the changes that occurred in CO2 in 1860 that now cause it to DRIVE temperature

You're asking me to explain your idiot conspiracy theory?

Do you grasp how insane that makes you look?

Sorry, but it's your kook theory, so it's entirely your job to back it up. Please proceed. We're all ears.

 

[Rambunctious]

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Please describe the changes that occurred in CO2 in 1860 that now cause it to DRIVE temperature

You're asking me to explain your idiot conspiracy theory?

Do you grasp how insane that makes you look?

Sorry, but it's your kook theory, so it's entirely your job to back it up. Please proceed. We're all ears.

How do you reconcile CO2 LAGGING temperature for 450,000 years but now it drives temperature?

 

[otto105]

Please describe the changes that occurred in CO2 in 1860 that now cause it to DRIVE temperature

You're asking me to explain your idiot conspiracy theory?

Do you grasp how insane that makes you look?

Sorry, but it's your kook theory, so it's entirely your job to back it up. Please proceed. We're all ears.

How do you reconcile CO2 LAGGING temperature for 450,000 years but now it drives temperature?

Fail

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Please describe the changes that occurred in CO2 in 1860 that now cause it to DRIVE temperature

You're asking me to explain your idiot conspiracy theory?

Do you grasp how insane that makes you look?

Sorry, but it's your kook theory, so it's entirely your job to back it up. Please proceed. We're all ears.

How do you reconcile CO2 LAGGING temperature for 450,000 years but now it drives temperature?

Fail

The Ice Core Data is a DENIER!!!!

Only explanation for why CO2 does NOT drive the temperature for 450,000 years prior to 1860