The First Nazi

[Picaro]

Hitler's Party number was 555. They started the member numbering at 500, to make the Party look bigger. In any case, it was the aristocrat Goering who introduce Hitler to the Junkers and industrialists, and Hitler was nearly the only Nazi leader who wasn't pro-Soviet; the rest were all left wing, even Himmler and Goebbels, who admired the Russian Revolution. Doesn't sound very 'Rouseau like' to me, but then I'm not out to do the revisionist history necessary for crazy smears of FDR, either.

What a load of complete drivel. The brown shirts were having pitched battles with the communists which they hated
even before Hitler joined them, they all without exception hated what they referred to as Jewish Bolshevism.
Don't talk shite!

Yes, we've established you never know squat about anything and just troll. The rest of us have already been there done that with Goebbels, Himmler, and the strasser bros.,, especially Goebbels, re their brand of 'National Bolshevism' and their support of the Russian Revolution. Hitler stands out for his anti-Soviet stance among his own Party and the SA as well. You're just another uninformed commie moron is all, and most likely a sexual deviant, also a characteristic of left wing sociopaths.

 

[Picaro]

Hitler's Party number was 555. They started the member numbering at 500, to make the Party look bigger. In any case, it was the aristocrat Goering who introduce Hitler to the Junkers and industrialists, and Hitler was nearly the only Nazi leader who wasn't pro-Soviet; the rest were all left wing, even Himmler and Goebbels, who admired the Russian Revolution. Doesn't sound very 'Rouseau like' to me, but then I'm not out to do the revisionist history necessary for crazy smears of FDR, either.

"Doesn't sound very 'Rouseau like' to me, but then I'm not out to do the revisionist history necessary for crazy smears of FDR, either. "


Not to worry.....I'm here to provide the thinking you seem unable to apply.

The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."



And here's where FDR falls under "b." above:

" Franklin Roosevelt had pictured a place where citizens were joined in a collective enterprise ... Reagan pictured a more individualistic America where everyone would flourish once freed from the shackles of the state, and so the watchwords became self-reliance and small government."
The Liberal Crackup

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-liberal-crackup-1502456857

That's a lot of noise, and yet it says nothing factual, as usual.

See what you've learned today?

yes, the usual nothing at all. Why do you ask? Still not sure of what you're babbling yet?

 

[Oz and the Orchestra]

Hitler's Party number was 555. They started the member numbering at 500, to make the Party look bigger. In any case, it was the aristocrat Goering who introduce Hitler to the Junkers and industrialists, and Hitler was nearly the only Nazi leader who wasn't pro-Soviet; the rest were all left wing, even Himmler and Goebbels, who admired the Russian Revolution. Doesn't sound very 'Rouseau like' to me, but then I'm not out to do the revisionist history necessary for crazy smears of FDR, either.

"Doesn't sound very 'Rouseau like' to me, but then I'm not out to do the revisionist history necessary for crazy smears of FDR, either. "


Not to worry.....I'm here to provide the thinking you seem unable to apply.

The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."



And here's where FDR falls under "b." above:

" Franklin Roosevelt had pictured a place where citizens were joined in a collective enterprise ... Reagan pictured a more individualistic America where everyone would flourish once freed from the shackles of the state, and so the watchwords became self-reliance and small government."
The Liberal Crackup

The Liberal Crackup

That's a lot of noise, and yet it says nothing factual, as usual.

See what you've learned today?

yes, the usual nothing at all. Why do you ask? Still not sure of what you're babbling yet?

Not going to even bother arguing with someone so beneath me - a total fruitcake!