The first Indian American Senator

LOL

My source is the U.S. Supreme Court...

United States v. Wong Kim Ark​
Generally speaking, non-citizens must follow American laws when on American soil, so they are “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” within the language of the Citizenship Clause.

Your source is you, rambling about taxes and voting.

Our sources are not equal.
that proves me right that unless they break a law we have no jurisdiction over them,,

and then its only to punish them for the law they broke,,
 
that proves me right that unless they break a law we have no jurisdiction over them,,

and then its only to punish them for the law they broke,,

LOLOLOL

Imbecile...

"subject to."

Means they don't have to be arrested. They just have to be subject to arrest if they break a law. Which they are.

You're a special kind of stupid. You know -- typical conservative.
 
LOLOLOL

Imbecile...

"subject to."

Means they don't have to be arrested. They just have to be subject to arrest if they break a law. Which they are.

You're a special kind of stupid. You know -- typical conservative.
and the jurisdiction ends with the enforcement of the law they broke,,

if they were americans they would be able to vote,, be taxed and many other things not applicable to visitors from other countries,,
 
and the jurisdiction ends with the enforcement of the law they broke,,

if they were americans they would be able to vote,, be taxed and many other things not applicable to visitors from other countries,,

Who do you think is becoming an American when a foreigner comes here to visit?
 
and the jurisdiction ends with the enforcement of the law they broke,,

if they were americans they would be able to vote,, be taxed and many other things not applicable to visitors from other countries,,
Hmm...So..if a non-citizen works, he/she does not pay Taxes? No with-holding? No Soc. Sec.? No unemployment tax? If they buy an item..it's tax-free, just for them?

LOL!

Anyway, anybody, regardless of citizenship, is protected by our laws. civil rights are guaranteed to non-citizens, as is due process. It may surprise you to learn that non-citizens can purchase and use firearms..so they to are protected by the 2nd.

Which is to say...if one is physically present in the United States..the United States has jurisdiction. A foreign country, has an 'interest' in the status of their citizens abroad..but zero jurisdiction..under our laws. That's what extradition is....relinquishing jurisdiction to the requesting party.

May aliens legally in the United States purchase firearms? | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

An alien legally in the U.S. is not prohibited from purchasing firearms unless the alien is admitted into the U.S. under a nonimmigrant visa and does not meet one of the exceptions as provided in 18 U.S.C. 922(y)(2), such as possession of a valid hunting license or permit.
 
Hmm...So..if a non-citizen works, he/she does not pay Taxes? No with-holding? No Soc. Sec.? No unemployment tax? If they buy an item..it's tax-free, just for them?

LOL!

Anyway, anybody, regardless of citizenship, is protected by our laws. civil rights are guaranteed to non-citizens, as is due process. It may surprise you to learn that non-citizens can purchase and use firearms..so they to are protected by the 2nd.

Which is to say...if one is physically present in the United States..the United States has jurisdiction. A foreign country, has an 'interest' in the status of their citizens abroad..but zero jurisdiction..under our laws. That's what extradition is....relinquishing jurisdiction to the requesting party.

May aliens legally in the United States purchase firearms? | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

An alien legally in the U.S. is not prohibited from purchasing firearms unless the alien is admitted into the U.S. under a nonimmigrant visa and does not meet one of the exceptions as provided in 18 U.S.C. 922(y)(2), such as possession of a valid hunting license or permit.
thanks for proving my point,,
 
taxes and voting are an indication who controls full jurisdiction,,

anyone in the country is under legal jurisdiction of our laws but not jurisdiction of citizenship..

thats one of the reasons other countries have embassies here so their people if need be can go to them for help and protection,,

Embassies can't help if you break the law. Unfortunately lots of people think otherwise. If you're on US soil you're under US jurisdiction....unless you're a foreign ambassador. Read the statute.
 
Hmm...So..if a non-citizen works, he/she does not pay Taxes? No with-holding? No Soc. Sec.? No unemployment tax? If they buy an item..it's tax-free, just for them?

LOL!

Anyway, anybody, regardless of citizenship, is protected by our laws. civil rights are guaranteed to non-citizens, as is due process. It may surprise you to learn that non-citizens can purchase and use firearms..so they to are protected by the 2nd.

Which is to say...if one is physically present in the United States..the United States has jurisdiction. A foreign country, has an 'interest' in the status of their citizens abroad..but zero jurisdiction..under our laws. That's what extradition is....relinquishing jurisdiction to the requesting party.

May aliens legally in the United States purchase firearms? | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

An alien legally in the U.S. is not prohibited from purchasing firearms unless the alien is admitted into the U.S. under a nonimmigrant visa and does not meet one of the exceptions as provided in 18 U.S.C. 922(y)(2), such as possession of a valid hunting license or permit.

Well done. You explained that well.
 
Back
Top Bottom