Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 65,087
- 59,277
- 3,600
Not with election fraud.No, he had legal trouble when he ran before and won, and he has had many court cases before he ever ran for president, see a connection?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not with election fraud.No, he had legal trouble when he ran before and won, and he has had many court cases before he ever ran for president, see a connection?
There has not been any election fraud is why.Not with election fraud.
This guy wasn’t covicted a RICO charge or a conspiracy chargeRemember RICO like a web of conspiracies involves people who know nothing about the big picture. It's no difference from the person who did a straw purchase of a firearm, for somebody who later commits a mass shooting. Realizing their role in a much more serious crime, leads them to help themselves, which requires they confess to what they knew.
Why? Of course we stole the 2020 presidential election and Trump can't do a damn thing about it except piss and moan. He can't even get judges he appointed to back him up. Pathetic! Bigly!!!Why are Dems still trying to justify stealing the 2020 election that they already stole? Seems they'd want to keep it on the down low. What do they have to gain?
You are a fool if you believe that.There has not been any election fraud is why.
Do the math. Trump announced he was running 6 months ahead of schedule, because he saw the indictments coming down the pike.And all while he is running for president. See a connection Einstein?
Fuck off idiotDo you tell them?
You should have done the math in 2020. Trump did nothing wrong.Do the math. Trump announced he was running 6 months ahead of schedule, because he saw the indictments coming down the pike.
Pretty much so.And everyone is corrupt.
Wrong, as the Mueller report said, Trump couldn't be indicted for anything he did, before 2021.You should have done the math in 2020. Trump did nothing wrong.
I would bet an expensive steak dinner that a corrupt judicial system left him no choice to avoid a long drawn out and obscenely expensive trial and possibility of a jail sentence for a plea deal in which he simply gets probation. Of course they made him agree to testify against the others, but if he's a smart man, and he probably is, he'll do so in a way that won't harm them.Trump co-defendant in Georgia criminal case, of interfering in the election, pleads guilty
The news continues to get worse for Donald Trump. Scott Walker pleads guilty to his part in interferring in the Georgia election. He has agreed to testify.
What is amazing as more truths come forward about Donald Trumps negative actions the Trump cult loves him more.
Trump may be one of the most effective cult leaders in history.
![]()
Donald Trump co-defendant in Georgia racketeering case, Scott Hall, pleads guilty to 5 misdemeanors
One of Donald Trump's co-defendants in the Georgia election racketeering case, Scott Hall, pleaded guilty Friday to five misdemeanors.www.usatoday.com
If there was actual guilt why would they drop the charges to misdemeanors?Gosh, you guys have an endless supply of deflections to cover for the guilt of Trump and his co-defendants.
They're toast. His plea agreement requires to confess to everything he did, and to tell them everything he knows, in addition to testifying about everything.I would bet an expensive steak dinner that a corrupt judicial system left him no choice to avoid a long drawn out and obscenely expensive trial and possibility of a jail sentence for a plea deal in which he simply gets probation. Of course they made him agree to testify against the others, but if he's a smart man, and he probably is, he'll do so in a way that won't harm them.
That only applies to certain people. Others can blatantly break the law and not be prosecuted if they have the right party affiliation.Maybe don't break the law in the first place.
for what?He also agreed to testify against others.
He also agreed to testify against others.
He also agreed to testify against others.
Bullshit.That only applies to certain people. Others can blatantly break the law and not be prosecuted if they have the right party affiliation.
Then why wasn't he indicted then?Wrong, as the Mueller report said, Trump couldn't be indicted for anything he did, before 2021.
John Edgar is the first not address the point. And also the first to act like a retard.Hall is the first to defect, and Missouri Mike is the first to deflect.
Since Trump couldn't be indicted, and as Trump appealed to the US Supreme Court, he couldn't even be investigated or subpoenaed as a sitting president. So the investigations didn't start until 2021. Add to that additional delays with Trump fighting every subpoena for information, appealing up the court layers, delaying the inevitable for 1-2 years.Then why wasn't he indicted then?