The firing of corrupt Peter Strzok will quickly lead to the unraveling of the entire Muller probe

[Skylar]

Getting back to the thread topic - STRZOK - again:

WHO INTERVIEWED HILLARY AND BROKE FBI PROTOCOL / STANDARDS BY NOT PUTTING HER UNDER OATH AND NOT RECORDING THE INTERVIEW?

STRZOK.


WHO PERSONALLY MODIFIED THE FBI'S FINAL REPORT ON THE HILLARY INVESTIGATION, MODIFYING THE VERBIAGE IN THE REPORT TO PROTECT HILLARY FROM INDICTMENT?

STRZOK


WHO INTERVIEWED HILLARY AIDES MILLS AND ABEDIN AND PROTECTED THEM FROM INDICTMENT FOR PERJURY WHEN THE RECORDS SHOW THEY LIED ABOYUT KNOWING ABOUT HILARY'S SERVER?

STRZOK


WHO INTERVIEWED FLYNN AND INDICTED HIM FOR PERJURY DESPITE COMEY TESTIFYING THAT HIS FBI AGENTS BELIEVED FLYNN DID NOT LIE WHEN INTERVIEWED?

STRZOK



WHO SENT TEXT MESSAGES REVEALING THE EXISTENCE OF A SECRET SOCIETY THAT HAD ALREADY MET TO DISCUSS STOPPING TRUMP FROM BECOMING PRESIDENT?

STRZOK


WHO SENT TEXT MESSAGES REVEALING DEPUTY DIRECTOR ANDREW McCABE HAVIG AN 'INSURANCE POLITY' TO USE AGAINST TRUMP, REVEALING THE CONSPIRACTY WITHIN THE FBI BY DECLARING 'WE WILL STOP HIM'?

STRZOK



Anyone who can NOT see the connection if not all the evidence collected that Strzok should be perp-walked, interrogated, and given a chance to roll over on HIS co--conspirators is blinder than Stevie Wonder.

Ah, the conspiracy spamming continues.

Alas, the same holes in your nonsense argument remain. You can't prove that the Steele Dossier was the sole basis of the Mueller investigation. While I disproved that conspiracy batshit by citing the Deputy AG who cited Comey's testimony before congress as the basis of the Mueller Investigatin.

You lose.

Oh, and the IG report found that there was no evidence of improper considerations, including political bias that affected the investigative decisions by the FBI.

However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.

Scathing Justice Dept. watchdog report rebukes James B. Comey, cites major missteps by FBI

Laughing......now why would I or any other rational person ignore the investigation of the IG on the matter and instead believe your batshit conspiracy theory, backed by nothing?

You lose again. You certainly live up to your name, Easy. As debunking your nonsense is so simple.

Sorry liar, you start off lying with your very 1st point. The US IG reported that STRZOK BROKE FBI PROTOCOL / PROCEDURES BY FAILING TO PUT HILLARY UNDER OATH BEFORE INTERVIEWING HER AND BY NOT RECORDING THE INTERVIEW.

Your entire BS at that point was completely rejected. Try again...or better yet, just go away.

And by lying, you mean quoting the IG report accurately?

Again, from the IG report itself:

There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific
investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.

Scathing Justice Dept. watchdog report rebukes James B. Comey, cites major missteps by FBI

NO evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, affected the investigative decisions.

Debunking your batshit conspiracy. And again, specifially in reference to the text messages:

But our review did not find evidence to connect the political views expressed in these messages to the specific investigative decisions that we reviewed; rather, consistent with the analytic approach described above, we found that these specific decisions were the result of discretionary judgments made during the course of an investigation by the Midyear agents and prosecutors and that these judgment calls were not unreasonable.

Scathing Justice Dept. watchdog report rebukes James B. Comey, cites major missteps by FBI

No evidence to connect political views with specific investigative decisions.

Debunking your batshit again.

Laughing....but tell us how accurately quoting the IG report is 'lying' again. It makes me giggle.

Continuing to repeat the same thing over and over while continuing to duck the fact that the US IG also declared Strzok violated FBI protocols and procedures in the IMPROPER interview of Hillary Clinton does not change the fact that it happened and that the US IG recommended Strzok be investigated for his actions, bias or not.

What I'm continuing to cite.....is the IG's findings.

The IG destroys your entire conspiracy. As you're claiming that political bias affected investigative decisions.

And the IG found zero evidence of it.

There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific
investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.

Scathing Justice Dept. watchdog report rebukes James B. Comey, cites major missteps by FBI

And once again, your entire conspiracy comes tumbling down.

Try again. This time while *not* ignoring the IG report obliterating your entire conspiracy.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Remember kids, Jeff Sessions is part of the Old Boy Network... i.e. The Deep State.
This is why he appointed an IG instead of an Independent Counsel.

Sessions goes out with Mueller, Comey et. al. during the Corleone Baptism Event -- this fall

 

[Skylar]

Remember kids, Jeff Sessions is part of the Old Boy Network... i.e. The Deep State.
This is why he appointed an IG instead of an Independent Counsel.

Sessions goes out with Mueller, Comey et. al. during the Corleone Baptism Event -- this fall

Says.....your imagination!

 

[Skylar]

So....since you folks have entirely abandoned the batshit claim that the Steele Dossier was the sole basis of the Mueller investigation, can we just put that piece of nonsense to bed?

As even ardent Trump supporters won't polish that turd.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Remember kids, Jeff Sessions is part of the Old Boy Network... i.e. The Deep State.
This is why he appointed an IG instead of an Independent Counsel.

Sessions goes out with Mueller, Comey et. al. during the Corleone Baptism Event -- this fall

Says.....your imagination!

Yeah...and?

 

[Skylar]

Remember kids, Jeff Sessions is part of the Old Boy Network... i.e. The Deep State.
This is why he appointed an IG instead of an Independent Counsel.

Sessions goes out with Mueller, Comey et. al. during the Corleone Baptism Event -- this fall

Says.....your imagination!

Yeah...and?

Your imagination doesn't amount to much as it doesn't have any probable connection to reality.

 

[easyt65]

US IG Horowitz:
"Strzok and other FBI employees “brought discredit to themselves” and hurt the bureau’s reputation"

US IG Horowitz:
“FBI Director Comey usurped the authority of the Attorney General,” “chose to deviate” from established procedures, and engaged “in his own subjective, ad hoc decision-making.”

US IG Horowitz:
Two Clinton lawyers who were also fact witnesses in the case should NOT have been allowed to sit in on Hillary's interview, which the FBI wrongly allowed.


CITING DIRECTLY FROM THE US IG REPORT:

"It is Strzok, though, whom he singles out for the most scrutiny. He is particularly concerned about an August 8, 2016, message in which, in response to a text from Page expressing fear that Trump would win the election, Strzok wrote back: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”

This, Horowitz wrote, is “not only indicative of a biased state of mind” but implies “a willingness to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects” — something he calls “antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice.”

So Horowitz reported that he believed Strzok was not politically mpotivated by still was motivated nonetheless, showing "a willingness to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects”
-- No kidding! Again, EVIDENCE shows that Abedin and Mills lied in their interview with Strzok - 'Lying to the FBI'.

Following through with that 'willingness to take official actions, Strzok perpetrated OBSTRUCTION by protecting them from indictment. BUSTED - proven by EVIDENCE (interview transcripts)

 

[Skylar]

US IG Horowitz:
"Strzok and other FBI employees “brought discredit to themselves” and hurt the bureau’s reputation"

US IG Horowitz:
“FBI Director Comey usurped the authority of the Attorney General,” “chose to deviate” from established procedures, and engaged “in his own subjective, ad hoc decision-making.”

US IG Horowitz:
Two Clinton lawyers who were also fact witnesses in the case should NOT have been allowed to sit in on Hillary's interview, which the FBI wrongly allowed.


CITING DIRECTLY FROM THE US IG REPORT:

"It is Strzok, though, whom he singles out for the most scrutiny. He is particularly concerned about an August 8, 2016, message in which, in response to a text from Page expressing fear that Trump would win the election, Strzok wrote back: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”

This, Horowitz wrote, is “not only indicative of a biased state of mind” but implies “a willingness to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects” — something he calls “antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice.”

So Horowitz reported that he believed Strzok was not politically mpotivated by still was motivated nonetheless, showing "a willingness to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects”
-- No kidding! Again, EVIDENCE shows that Abedin and Mills lied in their interview with Strzok - 'Lying to the FBI'.

Following through with that 'willingness to take official actions, Strzok perpetrated OBSTRUCTION by protecting them from indictment. BUSTED - proven by EVIDENCE (interview transcripts)

And yet the IG found ....

There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific
investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.

Scathing Justice Dept. watchdog report rebukes James B. Comey, cites major missteps by FBI

No evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, affected specific investigative decisions.

And your entire conspiracy goes 'poof'.

And since I've run you off the hapless nonsense that the Steele Dossier is the sole basis of the Mueller investigation, we can put the OP to bed.

 

[easyt65]

From the US IG report:

Horowitz expressed concern about a choice Strzok made late in the campaign to prioritize the Trump campaign/Russia investigation over investigating new Hillary Clinton emails found on Anthony Weiner’s laptop.

It was revealed that Hillary Aide Huma Abedin sent copies of every Hillary file and e-mail - including her TOP SECRET documents - to her EXTREMELY Illegal un-authorized unencrypted unsecured personal laptop at her home...the lap top she shared with her pedophile sexting husband, which most times sat on his naked junk while he sexted kids.

THIS WAS ILLEGAL AS HELL...and when brought to the FBI's attention they took no action for about a MONTH! Horowitz wrote, “we also did not identify a consistent or persuasive explanation for the FBI’s failure to act for almost a month.”

Information Obama himself called 'so classified it can not be released in any format without causing grave damage to our national security' sat illegally on a laptop in the Weiner's possession (with no idea why she did it / had it - espionage?) for a month with the FBI knowing about it and they did nothing?

 

[Skylar]

From the US IG report:

Horowitz expressed concern about a choice Strzok made late in the campaign to prioritize the Trump campaign/Russia investigation over investigating new Hillary Clinton emails found on Anthony Weiner’s laptop.

It was revealed that Hillary Aide Huma Abedin sent copies of every Hillary file and e-mail - including her TOP SECRET documents - to her EXTREMELY Illegal un-authorized unencrypted unsecured personal laptop at her home...the lap top she shared with her pedophile sexting husband, which most times sat on his naked junk while he sexted kids.

THIS WAS ILLEGAL AS HELL...and when brought to the FBI's attention they took no action for about a MONTH! Horowitz wrote, “we also did not identify a consistent or persuasive explanation for the FBI’s failure to act for almost a month.”

Information Obama himself called 'so classified it can not be released in any format without causing grave damage to our national security' sat illegally on a laptop in the Weiner's possession (with no idea why she did it / had it - espionage?) for a month with the FBI knowing about it and they did nothing?

Again, for the cheap seats.....the IG found no evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, affected specific investigative decisions.

You can ignore this. But you can't make us ignore it. Your entire conspiracy is debunked.

 

[easyt65]

US IG Horowitz:
"Strzok and other FBI employees “brought discredit to themselves” and hurt the bureau’s reputation"

US IG Horowitz:
“FBI Director Comey usurped the authority of the Attorney General,” “chose to deviate” from established procedures, and engaged “in his own subjective, ad hoc decision-making.”

US IG Horowitz:
Two Clinton lawyers who were also fact witnesses in the case should NOT have been allowed to sit in on Hillary's interview, which the FBI wrongly allowed.


CITING DIRECTLY FROM THE US IG REPORT:

"It is Strzok, though, whom he singles out for the most scrutiny. He is particularly concerned about an August 8, 2016, message in which, in response to a text from Page expressing fear that Trump would win the election, Strzok wrote back: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”

This, Horowitz wrote, is “not only indicative of a biased state of mind” but implies “a willingness to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects” — something he calls “antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice.”

So Horowitz reported that he believed Strzok was not politically mpotivated by still was motivated nonetheless, showing "a willingness to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects”
-- No kidding! Again, EVIDENCE shows that Abedin and Mills lied in their interview with Strzok - 'Lying to the FBI'.

Following through with that 'willingness to take official actions, Strzok perpetrated OBSTRUCTION by protecting them from indictment. BUSTED - proven by EVIDENCE (interview transcripts)

And yet the IG found ....

There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific
investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.

Scathing Justice Dept. watchdog report rebukes James B. Comey, cites major missteps by FBI

No evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, affected specific investigative decisions.

And your entire conspiracy goes 'poof'.

And since I've run you off the hapless nonsense that the Steele Dossier is the sole basis of the Mueller investigation, we can put the OP to bed.

Again, you continue to completely dodge what they DID find, hoping repeating the same thing over and over will make all the 'bad stuff' go away.

Youre not conning anyone - people can see what you are trying to do. Fail.

 

[easyt65]

Again, for the cheap seats.....the IG found no evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, affected specific investigative decisions.

You can continue to ignore the same US IG report you are trying to hide behind now, attempting to cherry-pick only what you think helps your argument.

 

[easyt65]

US IG Horowitz wrote:

In key moments, then Director Comey chose to deviate from the FBI’s and the Department’s established procedures and norms and instead engaged in his own subjective, ad hoc decision-making,”

There are two main examples here. First is Comey’s July 2016 public announcement that he wouldn’t recommend charges against anyone in the Clinton email case (which he coupled with criticism of Clinton for being “extremely careless”). Second is his October 2016 letter to Congress announcing that new Clinton emails had been discovered (on Weiner’s laptop). He made both of these decisions without any consultation with Justice Department officials, including his boss, Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

“These decisions usurped the authority of the Attorney General and upset the well-established separation between investigative and prosecutorial functions and the accountability principles that guide law enforcement decisions in the United States.”

 

[Skylar]

Again, for the cheap seats.....the IG found no evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, affected specific investigative decisions.

You can continue to ignore the same US IG report you are trying to hide behind now, attempting to cherry-pick only what you think helps your argument.

Your entire batshit conspiracy is that Strzok allowed his political bias to influence investigative decisions.

The IG found no evidence of it.

And your conspiracy collapses.

So, is that it? Is you ignoring the IG report really all you've got? If so, that was easy.

 

[Dschrute3]

All of these 'investigations' were initiated by Obama and Clinton. Conveniently, no Democrats are currently being investigated. Only Trump and his associates are. That, despite knowing Clinton and Obama colluded with foreigners to influence our Election. All folks need to do is look to the Ohr-Steele connection.

I think common sense-thinking Americans know what happened. They know it was all a well-coordinated dirty political Witch Hunt. Clinton allowed to skate, and no Democrats being investigated? It is a scam. Hopefully most Americans see that.

 

[Skylar]

And since no one is willing to defend the absurd premise of the OP that the Steele Dossier is the sole basis of the Mueller Investigation after I utterly disproved that nonsense.....

......I graciously accept your capitulation on the claim. The OP is abandoned.

 

[Skylar]

Interesting, all of these 'investigations' were initiated by Obama and Clinton. Conveniently, no Democrats are currently being investigated. Only Trump and his associates are. That, despite knowing Clinton and Obama colluded with foreigners to influence our Election. All folks need to do is look to the Ohr-Steele connection.

Oooh! Conspiracy insinuations backed by jack shit?

Where have I seen that before? Ah, yes. This entire thread.

I think common sense-thinking Americans know what happened. They now it was all a well-coordinated dirty political Witch Hunt. Clinton allowed to skate, and no Democrats being investigated? It is a scam. Hopefully most Americans see that.

And by 'common sense' you mean claims you can't factually back up and conspiracies you can't support?

Shocker.

 

[easyt65]

Under testimony before Congress, Former FBI Agent and Strzok's adulterous co-conspirator 'rolled over on' Strzok:

"From “we’ll stop it” and an “insurance policy,” both referring to the Trump presidency, GOP lawmakers want to know what Strzok meant.

Former FBI Lawyer Lisa Page Said Anti-Trump Texts With Peter Strzok 'Mean Exactly What They Say' "

“She's certainly more cooperative than Peter Strzok was and the pieces of information filled in some blanks along the way, but we've got a huge jigsaw puzzle to put together,”

When I questioned Lisa Page on Friday about the anti-Trump text messages that were sent between herself and Peter Strzok, there were significant differences in her testimony and Strzok’s


Uh-OH!




Former FBI Lawyer Lisa Page Said Anti-Trump Texts With Peter Strzok 'Mean Exactly What They Say'

 

[Dschrute3]

Interesting, all of these 'investigations' were initiated by Obama and Clinton. Conveniently, no Democrats are currently being investigated. Only Trump and his associates are. That, despite knowing Clinton and Obama colluded with foreigners to influence our Election. All folks need to do is look to the Ohr-Steele connection.

Oooh! Conspiracy insinuations backed by jack shit?

Where have I seen that before? Ah, yes. This entire thread.

I think common sense-thinking Americans know what happened. They now it was all a well-coordinated dirty political Witch Hunt. Clinton allowed to skate, and no Democrats being investigated? It is a scam. Hopefully most Americans see that.

And by 'common sense' you mean claims you can't factually back up and conspiracies you can't support?

Shocker.

All of these so-called 'investigations' were initiated by Obama/Clinton. Common sense-thinking folks find it very odd that no Democrats are being investigated. It's only been Trump and his associates.

Most know Clinton and Obama colluded with foreign entities to influence our Election. So where are the investigations of Democrats? That will have to happen. Until it happens, there can be no justice.

 

[Skylar]

Under testimony before Congress, Former FBI Agent and Strzok's adulterous co-conspirator 'rolled over on' Strzok:

"From “we’ll stop it” and an “insurance policy,” both referring to the Trump presidency, GOP lawmakers want to know what Strzok meant.

Former FBI Lawyer Lisa Page Said Anti-Trump Texts With Peter Strzok 'Mean Exactly What They Say' "

“She's certainly more cooperative than Peter Strzok was and the pieces of information filled in some blanks along the way, but we've got a huge jigsaw puzzle to put together,”

When I questioned Lisa Page on Friday about the anti-Trump text messages that were sent between herself and Peter Strzok, there were significant differences in her testimony and Strzok’s


Uh-OH!




Former FBI Lawyer Lisa Page Said Anti-Trump Texts With Peter Strzok 'Mean Exactly What They Say'

Laughing...This is from a month ago. And absolutely nothing came of it.

Try as you might, your conspiracy is debunked. As the entire premise, that investigative decisions were connected political views......was found to be baseless by the IG.

Which is one of the many reasons that Strzok being fired from the FBI has nothing to do with the Mueller investigation's continued existence.