The fascism grows

[Chuz Life]

Why would I have been?

Consistency.

 

[Crepitus]

Only losers have to steal memes.

YOU mean like all those Russian troll farm memes you kids post all the time?

 

[Crepitus]

Consistency.

That wasn't fascism.

 

[dudmuck]

Keeping your trap shut is expected on a golf course.

 

[Leo123]

YOU mean like all those Russian troll farm memes you kids post all the time?

No one knows what your spewing.

 

[Leo123]

So, you're into playing in shit? Stop projecting.

 

[whitehall]

The post doesn't qualify as a current event. It's a lame op-ed based on nothing by a left wing blog that promoted Kamala for president.

 

[konradv]

The post doesn't qualify as a current event. It's a lame op-ed based on nothing by a left wing blog that promoted Kamala for president.

True, it’s no Cat Turd.

 

[Chuz Life]

That wasn't fascism.

Huh...

But if they come for my guns (the ones in a pond somewhere) it would be fascism?

 

[Harry Dresden]

I live on earth. I realize things look different from tRumplandia.

ap[apparently it looks different from were you are too...and i can give a flying **** about your boogie man...

 

[LibertyKid]

Broadcasters have been ordered to censor any negative crowd reactions to trump appearing at the US open.

He was booed loudly the last time he attended.

And control of the media, a fascist staple, takes another step forward.

Broadcasters Ordered To Censor Crowd ‘Reactions’ When Trump Attends The US Open Men’s Final

Broadcasters covering the U.S. Open men's tennis final on Sunday have been "asked" to censor any audience reaction to President Trump, who plans to attend as the guest of tournament sponsor Rolex.

www.mediaite.com

Mediaite... never heard of her.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Broadcasters have been ordered to censor any negative crowd reactions to trump appearing at the US open.

He was booed loudly the last time he attended.

And control of the media, a fascist staple, takes another step forward.

Broadcasters Ordered To Censor Crowd ‘Reactions’ When Trump Attends The US Open Men’s Final

Broadcasters covering the U.S. Open men's tennis final on Sunday have been "asked" to censor any audience reaction to President Trump, who plans to attend as the guest of tournament sponsor Rolex.

www.mediaite.com

 

[JoeB131]

Huh...

But if they come for my guns (the ones in a pond somewhere) it would be fascism?

No, that would be "having sensible laws", which every other democracy has.

 

[TemplarKormac]

No, that would be "having sensible laws", which every other democracy has.

Joe, this is the part where I say:

"That depends on what you define as sensible."

So, let's hear it then. Be reminded that the word in this context has two parts: 1) A purely objective and universally accepted definition; and 2) One's own personally driven definition.

Think carefully before you respond.

 

[TimFitz]

Fair and partial justice system, secure borders, limited immigration, domestic tranquility, etc are fascism how exactly

The Supreme Court just reversed decades of precident and approved racial profiling.

What’s fair and impartial about that.

Americans never had to live in fear of having agents of the government stop them and demand their papers.

That was the stuff of Nazi Germany.

Now the US Supreme Court has endorsed it.

A straight line to facism, enthusiastically supported by people’s whose fear and resentment of all things not white eclipses their loyalty to the principles this country was founded on.

 

[struth]

The Supreme Court just reversed decades of precident and approved racial profiling.

What’s fair and impartial about that.

Americans never had to live in fear of having agents of the government stop them and demand their papers.

That was the stuff of Nazi Germany.

Now the US Supreme Court has endorsed it.

A straight line to facism, enthusiastically supported by people’s whose fear and resentment of all things not white eclipses their loyalty to the principles this country was founded on.

No, they didn't.

Why do you lie? Or is it that you just can't comprehend what is written?

 

[Dagoth-Ur]

The Supreme Court just reversed decades of precident and approved racial profiling.

What’s fair and impartial about that.

Americans never had to live in fear of having agents of the government stop them and demand their papers.

That was the stuff of Nazi Germany.

Now the US Supreme Court has endorsed it.

A straight line to facism, enthusiastically supported by people’s whose fear and resentment of all things not white eclipses their loyalty to the principles this country was founded on.

What fair and impartial about that? Easy, it works and allows law enforcement to make areas that are mostly minorities safer by reducing crime.

“Americans never had to live in fear of having agents of the government stop them and demand their papers.”

Try getting pulled over and see what your asked for pal.

“and resentment of all things not white eclipses their loyalty to the principles this country was founded on.”

Yeah because America was founded on open borders, mass immigration, welfarism, and a deep seated hatred of one’s people, past, culture and activity destroying it to make up for some mythical sins.

Your mad your side is losing and your buzzwords no longer work, this is the future your side chose.

Enjoy it, we will do a lot more things.

Like repeal the Immigration Act of 1965.

 

[Dagoth-Ur]

No, that would be "having sensible laws", which every other democracy has.

So infringing on one right is “ sensible” but restricting lawlessness isn’t? Also who cares if a “democracy” wants to limit individual rights, rights are above mob rule.

 

[JoeB131]

Joe, this is the part where I say:

"That depends on what you define as sensible."

So, let's hear it then. Be reminded that the word in this context has two parts: 1) A purely objective and universally accepted definition; and 2) One's own personally driven definition.

Think carefully before you respond.

Why would I respond to you, Twinky?

Accomplish something in life, then I'll be concerned about what you consider "sensible". .

For everyone else. Sensible gun laws.

1) Thorough background checks.
2) Licensing
3) Mandatory Liability insurance
4) Red Flag Laws.
5) Military grade weapons are prohibited

 

[Auld Phart]

Why would I respond to you, Twinky?

Accomplish something in life, then I'll be concerned about what you consider "sensible". .

For everyone else. Sensible gun laws.

1) Thorough background checks.
2) Licensing
3) Mandatory Liability insurance
4) Red Flag Laws.
5) Military grade weapons are prohibited

5) Military grade weapons are prohibited

"Military grade weapons" aren't the problem.