The EVIDENCE is simple. If you are counting mail-in ballots LAST instead of FIRST, it is FRAUD

[munkle]

please discuss

 

[Harry Dresden]

you have a link showing that law?....

 

[The Original Tree]

It’s not over. We are being lied to.

God is not done with America or President Trump!

Pray for our President without ceasing.

Pray for Our Republic!

God can do anything!

God is Everything.

It is God not man who raises up a country’s leaders, and it is God, not man who lays the nations low, and exposes the deeds of Evil Doers.

God is in control, and justice and righteousness will prevail and Donald Trump will be our president for 4 more years!

 

[munkle]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yep. Called the Law of Common Sense God Gave a Grasshopper's Behind.

 

[shockedcanadian]

I'm watching on Laura Ingraham and a woman is saying she was given only a marker in AZ, she complained, was assured it would be ok. She went to the website and it said she didn't vote.

She had on with her about 10 neighbours standing behind her on live TV in which the EXACT same thing happened to them and they all nodded their heads to this. All Trump voters being robbed in AZ.

Also, on election day I said they would work to flip GA on Trump as soon as they all went home for the night. Alot of rats in GA. Now I look at it's exactly tied at 99%. You know the media just wants to give ALL of the states left to Biden.

The Dems and others were preparing the world for this "eventuality" before the election.

 

[Harry Dresden]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yep. Called the Law of Common Sense God Gave a Grasshopper's Behind.

so its not a law?....how is it fraud then?...

 

[conserveguy877]

You would think with it being 2020, they'd have better resources to count these mail in ballots... Or have planned better since there was half a year to prepare for this. The fix is in and millions of Americans are getting it. Which gives the reason why President Trump goes nuclear by pushing for a runoff type election or a complete re-vote. If swamp demos want to go to this level.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yes. It was just ruled on by the Arizona Supreme Court.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

 

[Care4all]

please discuss

How can states count absentee ballots first, when many states have it in their election law that absentee ballots can not be counted until or after, election day.

Democrats tried to get those states to have their legislatures change those election l as a preventing the counting of absentee ballots earlier, but the Republican Majority legislature's REFUSED to allow it.

This whole process of slowing the counts on absentee ballots has been primarily caused by the Republicans and Trump campaign, supporting them.

 

[BULLDOG]

You would think with it being 2020, they'd have better resources to count these mail in ballots... Or have planned better since there was half a year to prepare for this. The fix is in and millions of Americans are getting it. Which gives the reason why President Trump goes nuclear by pushing for a runoff type election or a complete re-vote. If swamp demos want to go to this level.

Yes, there was more than a half year to prepare for this, and republican held legislatures refused to allow mail in ballots to be counted before election day in some states, and not even until the polls closed in others. It was all part of trump's plan to introduce as much disruption in the election as possible.

 

[Care4all]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yes. It was just ruled on by the Arizona Supreme Court.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

So all those absentee ballots in Arizona now being counted, that are all unusually favoring president Trump, and bringing him closer to overtaking Biden's lead,

SHOULD BE THROWN OUT????

 

[The2ndAmendment]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yes. It was just ruled on by the Arizona Supreme Court.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

So all those absentee ballots in Arizona now being counted, that are all unusually favoring president Trump, and bringing him closer to overtaking Biden's lead,

SHOULD BE THROWN OUT????

Arizona counted the mailins first, and is counting the in person now.

Notice how counting mailins before the in-person vote retained the sanity and integrity of the state.

 

[BULLDOG]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yes. It was just ruled on by the Arizona Supreme Court.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

So all those absentee ballots in Arizona now being counted, that are all unusually favoring president Trump, and bringing him closer to overtaking Biden's lead,

SHOULD BE THROWN OUT????

Arizona counted the mailins first, and is counting the in person now.

Notice how counting mailins before the in-person vote retained the sanity and integrity of the state.

Too bad Trump crippled the post office and caused so many ballots to be delivered so late.

 

[JimBowie1958]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yep. Called the Law of Common Sense God Gave a Grasshopper's Behind.

so its not a law?....how is it fraud then?...

Good God, you really are an idiot.

 

[JimBowie1958]

So all those absentee ballots in Arizona now being counted, that are all unusually favoring president Trump, and bringing him closer to overtaking Biden's lead,

SHOULD BE THROWN OUT????

Those are not mail-ins, girl, those are in person votes that were screwed by Democrat hacks.

 

[Lysistrata]

No fraud is involved. Some states allow the counting of mail-in ballots before Election Day. Other states have laws that specify that mail-in ballots cannot be counted until Election Day. therefore, no allegation of fraud can even be maintained based on the timing of the tabulation of mail-in ballots without reference to the law of the state at issue.

 

[JoeB131]

please discuss

Actually, that's kind of retarded.

Most of the states weren't allowed to start counting the mail-in ballots until Election day. Florida was allowed to count them in advance, which is why they came in early.

PA wasn't allowed to count them until day of.

And of course, as long as a ballot is postmarked before election day, it still counts, even if arrives today.

I kind of suspect a lot of ballots were lost in the mail. I know that I had to call Amex to get my bill for this month paid because I STILL haven't seen my paper bill in the mail.

 

[kyzr]

There are thousands of provisional ballots sitting in boxes in PA.
Shouldn't all legal provisional ballots be counted too?

 

[JWBooth]

Y’all still ain’t figured out that Joe Stalin was right about who does the counting.

 

[Harry Dresden]

you have a link showing that law?....

Yes. It was just ruled on by the Arizona Supreme Court.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

So all those absentee ballots in Arizona now being counted, that are all unusually favoring president Trump, and bringing him closer to overtaking Biden's lead,

SHOULD BE THROWN OUT????

Arizona counted the mailins first, and is counting the in person now.

Notice how counting mailins before the in-person vote retained the sanity and integrity of the state.

Too bad Trump crippled the post office and caused so many ballots to be delivered so late.

trump did not cripple the PO.....the PO's problems are of their own making...