The Epstein List?

Please explain why you mentally ill leftists are not seeking treatment,

You are still required to clean up your unsightly drool.
We don't believe Sandy Hook was staged like you mentally ill MAGA fucktards do.
 
Apparently Epstein's little black book was published quite some time ago. Here's ninety two pages of names.

An annotated copy of the address book, which also contains entries for Alec Baldwin, Ralph Fiennes, Griffin Dunne, New York Post gossip Richard Johnson, Ted Kennedy, David Koch, filmmaker Andrew Jarecki, and all manner of other people you might expect a billionaire to know, turned up in court proceedings after Epstein's former house manager Alfredo Rodriguez tried to sell it in 2009. About 50 of the entries, including those of many of Epstein's suspected victims and accomplices as well as Trump, Love, Barak, Dershowitz, and others, were circled by Rodriguez. (The existence of the book has been previously reported by the Daily Mail. Gawker is publishing it in full here for the first time; we have redacted addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, and the last names of individuals who may have been underage victims.)


WAPO article expands:

A Wall Street Journal investigation, using thousands of emails and schedules, uncovered new people who associated with Jeffrey Epstein for years after he was a convicted sex offender. The reporting revealed the kinds of favors he did—and threats he made—for those in his circle. Here are key articles from our investigation:

Still association with Jeffrey Epstein is not guilt. We might be contemptuous of the company somebody keeps--sometimes we SHOULD be contemptuous of the company somebody keeps--but that is not proof of guilt of a crime.

Most especially when those associations were at a time nobody knew anything about the hidden life of a person or the crimes, sometimes terrible crimes, being committed.

It is reported that Jeffrey Dahmer's neighbors in his apartment building had no idea early on that there was anything unusual about him. But they are in no way guilty of any of his crimes.

Even that photo of Prince Andrew with the underage girl looks incriminating, but is insufficient to prove Andrew committed an actual crime.

We may know in our hearts or have reasonable justification to suspect or even believe there was wrong doing. But in America we require sufficient evidence of a crime to convict somebody. At least unless we're in a partisan court with a partisan prosecutor, judge and jury making up crimes. The latter is not what America was intended to be.
 
Still association with Jeffrey Epstein is not guilt. We might be contemptuous of the company somebody keeps--sometimes we SHOULD be contemptuous of the company somebody keeps--but that is not proof of guilt of a crime.

Most especially when those associations were at a time nobody knew anything about the hidden life of a person or the crimes, sometimes terrible crimes, being committed.

It is reported that Jeffrey Dahmer's neighbors in his apartment building had no idea early on that there was anything unusual about him. But they are in no way guilty of any of his crimes.

Even that photo of Prince Andrew with the underage girl looks incriminating, but is insufficient to prove Andrew committed an actual crime.

We may know in our hearts or have reasonable justification to suspect or even believe there was wrong doing. But in America we require sufficient evidence of a crime to convict somebody. At least unless we're in a partisan court with a partisan prosecutor, judge and jury making up crimes. The latter is not what America was intended to be.
I took a photo with Ron Jeremy at the Rainbow Bar and Grill.

So clearly I am a pornography actor.

These lefties are ridiculous.
 
So why did He bounce Epstein from Mar A Lago after complaints of him going after a young girl?

Obviously to cover His tracks, right Don?
Evidently the reason is deeper than that

Trump was pissed that Epstein beat him out in a real estate deal and banned him from Mara Lago
 
Still association with Jeffrey Epstein is not guilt.
True. Famous people always get their pictures taken with others. You know, I remember when Jared Fogle was the hot ticket....everyone was getting their pic with him because he was popular with the public. I distinctly remember Hillary and some others posing with him one time. Try and find them.
 
Like I said, it's too obvious.

So obvious that it doesn't need proving! And if it's proven it would be considered to be a badge of honour for both of them.

Would Hitler lose support if he was caught shooting Jews in their heads? (you think about that now)
It is only obvious to a moron like you.
 
Still association with Jeffrey Epstein is not guilt.
So true!

Trump could have been there with Epstein to wish the girls happy birthday. and bring them gifts of clothes that covered up their skins.
 
Trump was pissed that Epstein beat him out in a real estate deal and banned him from Mara Lago
The bidding war was over an estate property Epstein agreed to close on, in bankruptcy court, it turned into a bidding war which Trump won, paying $41.35 million.

 
I took a photo with Ron Jeremy at the Rainbow Bar and Grill.

So clearly I am a pornography actor.

These lefties are ridiculous.
Back when I was in a job that gave me a LOT of public recognition, I was at many many different public events, met many people, was photographed with many people, most of whom I have no recollection of who they were or what they looked like. If I had to pick them out of a line up, I wouldn't have been able to do so. If asked I would say I had no recollection of having met this or that person and I would be speaking honestly. If any of them were crooks/criminals the photos would look like there was some kind of association when there was absolutely none.

Imagine Donald Trump, one of the most famous and recognizable people in the world for most of his adult life, social butterfly, invited to attend almost everything, stalked by the paparazzi, and thousands of photographs with people of which he almost certainly didn't really know and wouldn't remember but who wanted to be photographed with him. . .

To accuse him of some kind of association with those people is just plain dishonest.

He did know and would recognize Epstein of course, but that was back when Epstein was also considered an upstanding and okay guy by everybody. He and Trump were not close friends but were friends for a time. Trump did observe Epstein seemed to like his girlfriends to be really young. But he didn't find Epstein objectionable until Epstein was inappropriate with I think an employee at Mar-a-lago and Trump ejected and banned him.

That ended the association entirely. It was quite some time after that event that the world was informed of the criminal sex operations at Epstein Island, in New Mexico etc.
 
Last edited:
True. Famous people always get their pictures taken with others. You know, I remember when Jared Fogle was the hot ticket....everyone was getting their pic with him because he was popular with the public. I distinctly remember Hillary and some others posing with him one time. Try and find them.
We are American Ninja Warrior fans and one of our all time favorites was Drew Drechsel. We admired his great ability in the challenges and thought what a great guy when he would go out of his way to advise others how to defeat this or that apparatus. I would have loved to be photographed with him at that time.

But Drew's private life apparently wasn't so exemplary. He was found with child porn and soliciting minors, enticing them for sexual encounters. He was tried, convicted, sentenced to prison for a time.

But to assume that my husband and I are approving/condoning of or involved in sex crimes because we once admired Drew Dreschsel or because we were social friends with a guy who turned out to be a sex offender--I described that guy in a previous post--would just be dumb.
 
Last edited:
Back when I was in a job that gave me a LOT of public recognition, I was at many many different public events, met many people, was photographed with many people, none of which I have any recollection now of who they were or what they looked like. If I had to pick them out of a line up, I wouldn't have been able to do so. If asked I would say I had no recollection of having met this or that person and I would be speaking honestly. If any of them were crooks/criminals the photos would look like there was some kind of association when there was absolutely none.

Imagine Donald Trump, one of the most famous and recognizable people in the world for most of his adult life, social butterfly, invited to attend almost everything, stalked by the paparazzi, and thousands of photographs with people of which he almost certain didn't really know and wouldn't remember but who wanted to be photographed with him. . .

To accuse him of some kind of association with those people is just plain dishonest.

He did know and would recognize Epstein of course, but that was back when Epstein was also considered an upstanding and okay guy by everybody. He and Trump were not close friends but were friends for a time. Trump did observe Epstein seemed to like his girlfriends to be really young. But he didn't find Epstein objectionable until Epstein was inappropriate with I think an employee at Mar-a-lago and Trump ejected and banned him.

That ended the association entirely. It was quite some time after that event that the world was informed of the criminal sex operations at Epstein Island, in New Mexico etc.

Please tell me you are Dan Marino.

All kidding aside you ******* nailed it.

The left push false narratives like I breathe.
 
Back when I was in a job that gave me a LOT of public recognition, I was at many many different public events, met many people, was photographed with many people, none of which I have any recollection now of who they were or what they looked like. If I had to pick them out of a line up, I wouldn't have been able to do so. If asked I would say I had no recollection of having met this or that person and I would be speaking honestly. If any of them were crooks/criminals the photos would look like there was some kind of association when there was absolutely none.

Imagine Donald Trump, one of the most famous and recognizable people in the world for most of his adult life, social butterfly, invited to attend almost everything, stalked by the paparazzi, and thousands of photographs with people of which he almost certain didn't really know and wouldn't remember but who wanted to be photographed with him. . .

To accuse him of some kind of association with those people is just plain dishonest.

He did know and would recognize Epstein of course, but that was back when Epstein was also considered an upstanding and okay guy by everybody. He and Trump were not close friends but were friends for a time. Trump did observe Epstein seemed to like his girlfriends to be really young. But he didn't find Epstein objectionable until Epstein was inappropriate with I think an employee at Mar-a-lago and Trump ejected and banned him.

That ended the association entirely. It was quite some time after that event that the world was informed of the criminal sex operations at Epstein Island, in New Mexico etc.
Were you talking about Trump, or some other sex offender with a record as long as your arm?

Let it go! The facts on Trump's record of offences isn't going to hurt him one bit.

Bill proved that a president could get blown by an intern and still rise in popularity!

Only the commies would tray to defame Trump for an equal or *lesser crime.

*not lesser for Christians.
 
15th post
Were you talking about Trump, or some other sex offender with a record as long as your arm?

Let it go! The facts on Trump's record of offences isn't going to hurt him one bit.

Bill proved that a president could get blown by an intern and still rise in popularity!

Only the commies would tray to defame Trump for an equal or *lesser crime.

*not lesser for Christians.
Sorry but I prefer to deal with people who are able to read and comprehend which your post suggests you are incapable of doing. So please understand that I choose not to feed the trolls, argue with idiots, or engage in other exercises in futility and do have a pleasant afternoon.
 
The bidding war was over an estate property Epstein agreed to close on, in bankruptcy court, it turned into a bidding war which Trump won, paying $41.35 million.

The falling out was Epstein's behavior with I think it was a Mar-a-lago employee but at least somebody at Mar-a-lago. Trump ejected him and banned him at that time. That ended the relationship.
 
Sorry but I prefer to deal with people who are able to read and comprehend which your post suggests you are incapable of doing. So please understand that I choose not to feed the trolls, argue with idiots, or engage in other exercises in futility and do have a pleasant afternoon.
Yeah so don't forget it.

I prefer to use you.
 
Back
Top Bottom