Missing the point entirely, aren't you?
Okay, we'll try this again. What happens in Countries where you just have a few rich people and lots and lots and lots of poor people living in squalor?
Pssst. Pssst. I'll give you some hints.
France -1789
Russia- 1917
China- 1949
Cuba - 1959
Iran - 1979
And you have none of the courage those revolutionaries had.
Hell, you big sissy, you wouldn't even sue the company that fired you, though you claim you had cause.
No, all any of you will do is post angrily and impotently on the internet, and pray to Gaea that someone will come along and do the heavy lifting for you.
So, I repeat:
Tissue?
Quite the contrary, guy. The last thing I want is for the poor people to get so fed up they overthrow the system. That never works out well and it usually takes decades to put shit back together.
I just point out that pouring lots and lots of gasoline on the floor is a bad idea before someone strikes a match.
You see, you want to make it about me, but it really isn't.
I lined up a new job within two week of losing that one. A few months later, they fired about half the staff, the other half was miserable. About half the people who worked there even came to me to write resumes for them. (Which is how I got the idea to start writing resumes for money as a side job.)
So, yeah, I will do okay in a system where the rich are stealing every dollar that is lying about.
And I will do okay in a system where the rich are lined up against the nearest wall and shot.
It's just that realizing one inevitably leads to the other and is a terrible idea being the trick, dumbass.
Conservatism. It's like Stockholm Syndrome.