The Envirowhackos are Melting!

[jc456]

Of course, any child with Google can produce mountains of evidence..

Of course the "evidence" would all be based on false data but that has never stopped the Environmental Wackos from going ape shit crazy, has it?.

the facts aren't there for them. they try desperately to find it, but they fail every time.

 

[Crepitus]

Published papers confirming global warming

And not one contradicts it. But dumbass here thinks he is presenting an actual challenge to the robust theories by pulling his taffy in an echo chamber. How embarrassing.

He's an idiot.

thought you were done here?

I am.

 

[jc456]

Published papers confirming global warming

And not one contradicts it. But dumbass here thinks he is presenting an actual challenge to the robust theories by pulling his taffy in an echo chamber. How embarrassing.

He's an idiot.

thought you were done here?

I am.

nope

 

[SSDD]

there answer is either, it's already been given out, or just go to google. yet, not one time has any one of them provided the paper they stand and pound their chests that they claim they have. Dude, it's hilarious.

I keep asking.....they keep mewling...I love it.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Is it me, or are they really short on posting evidence?

 

[Crick]

The mainstream science posters here have likely posted orders of magnitude more evidence than have the deniers. And considering that most denier "evidence" comes from very questionable sources while most mainstream evidence comes from published science journals... well, you get the picture.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The mainstream science posters here have likely posted orders of magnitude more evidence than have the deniers. And considering that most denier "evidence" comes from very questionable sources while most mainstream evidence comes from published science journals... well, you get the picture.

Post this imaginary "evidence"

Post the lab work.

 

[Crick]

Retake the "Remedial Comprehension of Simple English Sentences" that you obviously failed in your last attempt.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Of course the "evidence" would all be based on false data

Of course, that's a shameless lie you don't even understand and have regurgitated from lying bloggers paid to fool ignorant people like you.

 

[jc456]

The mainstream science posters here have likely posted orders of magnitude more evidence than have the deniers. And considering that most denier "evidence" comes from very questionable sources while most mainstream evidence comes from published science journals... well, you get the picture.

Places that admit falsifying data? I agree!

 

[jc456]

Of course the "evidence" would all be based on false data

Of course, that's a shameless lie you don't even understand and have regurgitated from lying bloggers paid to fool ignorant people like you.

They admitted it is falsified. Don’t you follow the mainstream news?

 

[jc456]

Retake the "Remedial Comprehension of Simple English Sentences" that you obviously failed in your last attempt.

So you got nothing to come back with except English lessons! Too funny. As has been stated before, you got nothing

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They admitted it is falsified.

No they didn't. The body of data is huge and comes from many sources and relates to many parts of our climate. You have no idea what you are talking about, per usual, and probably should not even comment on this topic at all.

 

[jc456]

They admitted it is falsified.

No they didn't. The body of data is huge and comes from many sources and relates to many parts of our climate. You have no idea what you are talking about, per usual, and probably should not even comment on this topic at all.

Well actually they did. It’s all in the forum. Do a search. Look under noaa admits, nasa admits. Then climate emails. I get you hate facts

 

[Billy_Bob]

there answer is either, it's already been given out, or just go to google. yet, not one time has any one of them provided the paper they stand and pound their chests that they claim they have. Dude, it's hilarious.

I keep asking.....they keep mewling...I love it.

Westwall hit it on the head in another thread.. They are trained monkeys going oooooh, ooooooh, oooooh and pointing... Nothing more than useful idiots..

 

[Billy_Bob]

They admitted it is falsified.

No they didn't. The body of data is huge and comes from many sources and relates to many parts of our climate. You have no idea what you are talking about, per usual, and probably should not even comment on this topic at all.

Your problem is Obvious...

 

[SSDD]

The mainstream science posters here have likely posted orders of magnitude more evidence than have the deniers. And considering that most denier "evidence" comes from very questionable sources while most mainstream evidence comes from published science journals... well, you get the picture.

You need a dictionary very badly...what you guys tend to post is data...and then you make assumptions about what it means,..

Evidence - that which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof.

Data - individual facts, statistics, or items of information

You have data and assumptions....not evidence which is precisely why when I ask for evidence to support claims, you can't produce it...the data is just information...it doesn't support your claims...

 

[Crick]

So you refuse to reject the insane charge that all the world's climate scientists are involved in a massive and perfectly executed conspiracy to lie to the public in order to profit from research grants. Have you run that past your graduate advisor?

 

[SSDD]

They admitted it is falsified.

No they didn't. The body of data is huge and comes from many sources and relates to many parts of our climate. You have no idea what you are talking about, per usual, and probably should not even comment on this topic at all.

Actually, by your own admission, you have no idea of whether he knows what he is talking about or not...you have admitted complete ignorance on the topic...you have no informed opinion of your own with which to make such a claim...you only have an opinion someone with a political agenda gave you...and again, by your own admission, you have no idea whether that one is right or wrong either...you are a mouthpiece..a puppet...nothing more.

 

[SSDD]

So you refuse to reject the insane charge that all the world's climate scientists are involved in a massive and perfectly executed conspiracy to lie to the public in order to profit from research grants. Have you run that past your graduate advisor?

When you look back through history at all the consensus positions on practically every scientific topic that have fallen..and the list covers almost all of science...do you really think that they were all conspiracies? They were people who got it wrong....and in most cases, were just too proud to admit how wrong they were...

And I don't guess you realize that that stupid conspiracy argument is just one more logical fallacy in a very long and dismal line of logical fallacies coming from you...is that all you have?