berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 33,547
- 27,333
- 2,820
The harm of repeating the false link between immigration and crime
Even recognizing that a statement is false becomes more difficult when someone repeatedly hears false information.In what cognitive scientists call the “illusory truth effect,” the more someone hears a statement, the more likely they are to believe it. A leading explanation for the phenomenon is that repetition makes information easier to process, making it seem more truthful. A 2021 study found that even as the greatest increase in perceived truth happened when subjects heard a piece of information a second time, subjects reported perceptions of truth increased with repetition up to nine times, and didn’t decrease with further repetition.
Falsely linking immigration and crime has resulted in real policies. These include Secure Communities, a Department of Homeland Security Program that flags immigrants in local law enforcement custody for deportation, and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s 287(g) program, which delegates some immigration enforcement tasks to local law enforcement.
Fact-checking Thousands of Trump’s Quotes About Immigrants
Trump repeats false and misleading claims on immigration, an analysis of 12,000 statements shows.
Before I go any further I'd be remiss for not mentioning how chock full this article is of factual info debunking trump's immigration lies. It's worth a top to bottom read.
One lie that gets repeated frequently (two for those who are counting), and was repeated again yesterday by the former weekend talking head at Fox during a congressional hearing..............
Iran Crisis Overshadowed as Senators Squabble at Hearing
..........is there are 21M illegal immigrants in the US as a result of Biden's "open border" policy. Being a well practiced liar from the #1 source of RWM disinformation, the lies roll off Pete's tongue with alacrity. Which is why he was nominated to be in Don's cabinet.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was asked early in the hearing whether he would ignore court orders regarding the domestic use of troops, if ordered to do so by Mr. Trump.
“I don’t believe district courts should be setting national security policy,” Mr. Hegseth said as Democrats questioned him about the legality of sending military personnel to Los Angeles amid protests over immigration raids. Pressed further, he said he would honor a ruling by the Supreme Court.
Frankly, Charlotte, I don't give a damn what you think district courts should or shouldn't be doing. You and your boss don't get to pick and choose which court orders to obey. In America, where officials like the Sec. of Defense (and prez) take an oath to uphold the Constitution, court orders are sacrosanct until overruled on appeal. No matter how many times you repeat assertions to the contrary.