The efficacy of allowing one's self to be duped.

People claim to be anarchists or libertarian to somehow hide the fact they are run of the mill every day democrats.

I understand why…but why?
 
I spoon feed this person Murray Rothbard and they refuse to enlighten themselves.

Democrat
 
  • Funny
Reactions: cnm
.

The efficacy of allowing one's self to be duped.​

goes something like v-this-v

Judge Lets Michigan Fake Electors Walk Because They ‘Sincerely Believed’ 2020 Big Lie​

A group of Michigan fake electors learned on Tuesday that believing the 2020 election was stolen can still pay off: a state judge dismissed a criminal fraud case against them after finding that they “sincerely believe” there were irregularities in President Trump’s defeat that year.

The ruling brings the last criminal case against the 2020 fake electors to an end.

Judge Kristen D. Simmons found in a hearing that prosecutors had failed to produce “evidence sufficient to prove intent” in bringing fraud charges against 15 people who agreed to submit fake certificates saying that they were Michigan’s electors.

Simmons added at the hearing that “right, wrong, or indifferent,” many in Michigan “sincerely believe, for some reason, that there were some serious irregularities with the election, or with the voting, and that somehow their candidate didn’t receive all the votes that was intended to for them.” Without intent to break the law, Simmons said, there could be no further prosecution on the fraud charges.

Everything that actually happened in that column points to a wrongful prosecution, only the headline [bold print] pretrends otherwise, the court even made it clear that not only was the prosecution acting in bad faith [see how I did that, it's called journalistic license when the pros do it] but that for whatever reason many people believe the election had irregularities that the prosecution could not deny with any evidence.
Of note, the judge is a Dem. So much for the claim of "radical, leftist judges unfairly punishing Repub's."
TRANSLATION: [minus the spin it reads] "even a radical democratic judge knew punishing these people would have been unfair"...
The article belies your claim, it really proves how easily those who want to be duped can be when the media hits its target audience.
 
Last edited:
If you find those, let me know.
One giveaway you don't need glasses for is anyone wearing this hat.

1757509550725.webp
 
Who knew that sincerely believing in the Big Lie could someday come in handy in a criminal case? I wonder if any of the Jan. 6 defendants convicted of violent crimes against police officers tried it? Oh well, no matter, they all got pardons.

Judge Lets Michigan Fake Electors Walk Because They ‘Sincerely Believed’ 2020 Big Lie​

A group of Michigan fake electors learned on Tuesday that believing the 2020 election was stolen can still pay off: a state judge dismissed a criminal fraud case against them after finding that they “sincerely believe” there were irregularities in President Trump’s defeat that year.

The ruling brings the last criminal case against the 2020 fake electors to an end.

Judge Kristen D. Simmons found in a hearing that prosecutors had failed to produce “evidence sufficient to prove intent” in bringing fraud charges against 15 people who agreed to submit fake certificates saying that they were Michigan’s electors.

Simmons added at the hearing that “right, wrong, or indifferent,” many in Michigan “sincerely believe, for some reason, that there were some serious irregularities with the election, or with the voting, and that somehow their candidate didn’t receive all the votes that was intended to for them.” Without intent to break the law, Simmons said, there could be no further prosecution on the fraud charges.


Of note, the judge is a Dem. So much for the claim of "radical, leftist judges unfairly punishing Repub's."

Your Talking Points Memo bullshit opinion piece is sheer nonsense, of course.
 
I don't claim to be a libertarian either. But again.......no comment on the article.
So you are a Dem.

I will not bother you anymore.

If you want to be enlightened, read Rothbard.
 
15th post
Who knew that sincerely believing in the Big Lie could someday come in handy in a criminal case? I wonder if any of the Jan. 6 defendants convicted of violent crimes against police officers tried it? Oh well, no matter, they all got pardons.

Judge Lets Michigan Fake Electors Walk Because They ‘Sincerely Believed’ 2020 Big Lie​

A group of Michigan fake electors learned on Tuesday that believing the 2020 election was stolen can still pay off: a state judge dismissed a criminal fraud case against them after finding that they “sincerely believe” there were irregularities in President Trump’s defeat that year.

The ruling brings the last criminal case against the 2020 fake electors to an end.

Judge Kristen D. Simmons found in a hearing that prosecutors had failed to produce “evidence sufficient to prove intent” in bringing fraud charges against 15 people who agreed to submit fake certificates saying that they were Michigan’s electors.

Simmons added at the hearing that “right, wrong, or indifferent,” many in Michigan “sincerely believe, for some reason, that there were some serious irregularities with the election, or with the voting, and that somehow their candidate didn’t receive all the votes that was intended to for them.” Without intent to break the law, Simmons said, there could be no further prosecution on the fraud charges.


Of note, the judge is a Dem. So much for the claim of "radical, leftist judges unfairly punishing Repub's."
🙄 Bug.80 is so shallow, even a mirage has more depth.
 
I was paraphrasing the judge

one of the resons given by the judge was that they may be right.
We know they aren't. There was no actual evidence in refute of the charge that they based their belief at the time on anything real.
 
The judge never said they may be right.
from the article
Simmons added at the hearing that “right, wrong, or indifferent,” many in Michigan “sincerely believe, for some reason, that there were some serious irregularities with the election, or with the voting,
Simmons is the judge, his/her/they words are in quotes [you understand what that means right?]...now you must go into your mental contortionist routine to try and mold your pretzel logic into something resembling honest thought and then try and pass it off as the honesty it lacks...lots of luck with that.
 
Back
Top Bottom