The Dwindling Dem & Rep Numbers, Indies Rising Annually, GOP Smallest Now

ThoughtCrimes

Old Navy Vet
Jun 25, 2012
4,331
994
245
Desert Southwest
I have been reading so many posts lately about who's Kung Fu was better on the political battlefield in these here United States. The GOP'ers have been the folks with the most constant and loudest harangue in attack of their adversaries of the left's political affiliations. Silly rabbits, as if that truly added weight and changed the balance believing the political affiliation were the true path to enlightenment and the penultimate and true 'Way of the Dragon' in their political jihad.

Thinking about that tiresome back and forth, I went about looking for some basic facts and truth at the root of the issue and, as an Independent, was rewarded handsomely. I found a trove of information with data that went back almost 15 years at the website of one of the oldest polling firms in the USA; Gallup!
~~ Party Affiliation ~~

Their data I used in the graphs below can be found at the link above. It contains the polling results of 322 polls over the last 178 months (~15 years) with multiple sampling from one to five polls per month. To maintain the time intervals in the Y axis I only used the first poll of any given month. The Trend lines for each plot of the data are 4th order polynomial owing to the number of data points over extended time. Here's the first graph showing the plots of the percentages of Independents, Democrats and Republicans and the trend line of each plot.

The point of greatest interest is that Independents rank 1st in numbers, Democrats rank 2nd and Republicans rank last in numbers overall. As a matter of fact, the percentages over the average of the entire 178 months from the data are Independents = 38.2%, Democrats = 31.8% and Republicans = 28.2%.

From the starting point of the Chart in January 2004, the top three political groups were essentially equal at one third each, but that changed in an unexpected manner starting in the middle of 2006. The most defining characteristic of the chart directly below displays that over time the number of Independents has grown significantly to ~ 43%, while the numbers have shrunk to ~30% for Democrats and ~27% for Republicans.

Political Party Graph 1.PNG


In conjunction with the data collected above for those three categories, separate polling was done at the same time for a second Gallup data set.The categories were for those identifying as Republican plus those Independents leaning Republican and those identifying as Democrat plus those Independents leaning Democratic. I was blown away when I graphed the data and saw the results.

The plots display a combination of a distinct preference by the electorate toward the Bluer side of the political spectrum and a distancing from the redder part unlike the attitudes of just 15 years ago. But the most fascinating and startling was the WIDE disparity between the Dem, GOP and Indy allegiance for nearly the last 15 years. The two party system appears to be slowly dying.

I believe the take away from these two Charts is for the last 15 years the electorate has increasingly tired of the two political parties dominating the political landscape and moving their allegiance away from Republican or Democrat support to a non-committal paradigm. Hell, even Texans are pulling their heads out into the fresh air considering the Senate contest there this year.

Political Party Graph.2.PNG
 
We need a party for real people. Repubs are corporatists and Dems are all for minorities.
 
polls are unreliably and always will be.
So where in either data set for either chart are the inaccuracies that make them unreliable for the purpose for which employed?? Point them out because they aren't at all apparent, and to show you're not just a showboating troll and know nothing parroting propaganda for your minders! Come and show you're not just a mindless fool and a waste of air.

Have you nothing to say about the content of the OP?
 
We need a party for real people. Repubs are corporatists and Dems are all for minorities.
WHY do YOU NEED a party. Can you not think and evaluate for yourself? Do you need assistance with your decision making from partisans of one tribe or another?

The charts in the OP display a 15 year trend of the electorate moving AWAY from party dominance and control. political parties are nothing more than faction peddlers. Look in my signature line below and see what one of the framers wrote in the Federalist Papers about factions. You can accept that wisdom or reject it and continue believing you must remain dependent on the guidance of your chosen faction.
 
Gary Johnson killed the greatest opportunity a 3rd party has ever had by not knowing what Aleppo is
 
It doesn't matter what people register as if they are still going to vote R or D
 
It doesn't matter what people register as if they are still going to vote R or D

I have to agree. I've been a Registered Indi for decades. Used to be a Rep but I left that party decades ago.

I did vote for Gary Johnson in the election before this one.

Voting for Trump was a last minute decision for me. I thought what the hell. The guys not a politician and doesn't answer to anyone. I decided to take a chance a vote for him.

Its the best vote I ever made.
 
It doesn't matter what people register as if they are still going to vote R or D
Currently, the reason for that is as obvious as the nose on your face. What two faction hold sway in determining the names on the ballots for the primary elections and how did they wrest that control from other factions that existed or tried to form in the several States? You haven't noticed the fix is on at that level?

The point of the OP is that the R's and D's are trending out of favor with the electorate with the Indy share rising to ~ 43% and the R's & D's falling to ~ 27% & 30% respectively from their quasi equilibrium 15 years ago. Can we say diminishing returns?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top