Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
YOU are a big nothingburger, troll. You wasted your life the last 7 years pushing traitors' lies that have been thoroughly debunked.
This post has not aged well.Red State ^ | 09/16/2021 | Nick Arama
We reported yesterday word that an indictment might be coming in the Durham investigation and that it would be a person of some significance — Michael Sussman, who worked for Perkins Coie, the firm that represented both Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.
Now the indictment is in from the federal grand jury. The charge is that he lied to the FBI, telling them that he wasn’t representing the Clinton 2016 campaign when he was spreading the false stories about the Trump Organization and a Russian bank. In other words, the very charge is saying that, yes, he indeed was working for the Clinton campaign in spreading these false stories — saying officially (although we’ve obviously always known it) that the Clinton campaign was behind it. So that declaration is in itself is big.
Durham needed to get the indictment in under the wire because there was a five-year statute of limitations on the charge of making a false statement to federal authorities that was about to run out within three days.
From The NY Post:
That sounds like dead-to-rights to me. And they finally drop the name of Marc Elias. Can we expect to hear more there, as well?
You had stuff like this coming full circle — Hillary Clinton then using the information that she allegedly paid for against Donald Trump, pushing the myth of Russia collusion.
Sussman then allegedly pressed reporters to write about the Alfa Bank allegation and accused a NY Times reporter of not thoroughly investigating Trump.
The FBI found the Alfa Bank claim was nonsense — that the server in question “was not owned or operated by the Trump Organization, but, rather, had been administered by a mass marketing email company that sent advertisements for Trump’s hotels and hundreds of other clients.”
Then there was this fascinating bit of information in the indictment — that they may have accessed “non-public information” about Trump and coordinated with the Clinton campaign. The “tech executive” was, according to the indictment, promised a job in the Clinton administration that never came to be.
As was clear from the beginning, the wrong was all on the side of the folks trying to push the Russia collusion hoax. They allegedly did what they were trying to accuse Trump of doing.
What will be interesting is to see what else, if anything, they might have coming, if they are picking off a fish this close to the Clintons.
Jonathan Turley has a great breakdown of some of the connect-the-dot highlights that have already been reported of late:
So there’s a lot there that they could yet pursue with a lot of names in the mix. But this indictment today, I have to admit, I had given up hope that we might ever see something that consequential that really tied the Clinton people into the collusion. So I have to admit to being pleasantly surprised and hopeful that more may yet be in the offing.
--------------------
And if this is true, Sussman has a choice to make:
Cooperate and beg for protection.
Take the ride and pray he wins.
He’s a dead man walking.
All depends on how strong a case he has and what he’s looking at punishment wise. If he falls on the sword with the promise that his family will be taken care of, no harm to any of them, and he’ll be set for life when he gets out, he just might survive.
Anything short of that and he’s toast.
But again, all depends on the case, just how guilty he really is and who tries it.
BTW, Hildebeast says Sussmann did not kill himself, unlike Epstein!
"Debunked" how?YOU are a big nothingburger, troll. You wasted your life the last 7 years pushing traitors' lies that have been thoroughly debunked.
"Debunked" how?
By whom?
When?
It figures you are still too stupid to figure it out even now, troll...
Durham's report put an official end to Hillary's hoax & Obama's / Biden's / Democrat's failed coup ... and your parroted false narrative.
"Debunked" how?
By whom?
When?
EXOPOSED:
Michael Sussman, prominent liberal lawyer who worked for Perkins Coie, was spreading false stories about the Trump Organization and Russians while he represented both Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.
We already knew from previous evidence that Obama and his administration learned Hillary Clinton and her team was planning to use Russian-authored propaganda against Donald Trump to help her beat him in that election. It was reported that Obama, Comey, and other key players acquired the report from Trump-hating ex-foreign spy Steele and took over the Clinton plan to use the Russian Intel Service authored propaganda against Trump.
According to Durham's indictment against Sussman. Sussman lied under oath to the FBI, telling them he was NOT working for Hillary Clinton and the DNC while he was spreading false Russia-Trump propaganda.
"According to the indictment, Sussmann met with then-FBI General Counsel James A. Baker on that date to pass along allegations that servers at the Trump Organization were connected to servers at Alfa-Bank, a Moscow-based financial institution. During their conversation, Sussmann allegedly told Baker that “he was not acting on behalf of any client, which led the FBI General Counsel to understand that Sussmann was conveying the allegations as a good citizen and not as an advocate”.
“In fact….” the indictment states, “in assembling and conveying these allegations, Sussmann acted on behalf of specific clients,” including the Clinton campaign. [….]
The indictment also claims that Sussmann had “coordinated and communicated” about the Alfa-Bank allegations “during telephone calls and meetings” with an unidentified tech executive who had passed him the purported server data in the summer of 2016 and the Clinton campaign’s general counsel, Marc Elias — then a Perkins Coie partner.
Those calls and meetings, the document alleges, were billed by Sussmann to the Clinton campaign."
The fact that Sussman was working for and doing Hillary Clinton's bidding s no surprise at all.
The fact that Hillary Clinton was behind the initial attempt to falsely accuse Trump, to smear an opponent with propaganda and false information in an attempt to win an election, is not shocking, either. This was not the 1st time she had done this to an opponent.
When Barak Obama came out of nowhere to challenge her for the Presidency the 1st time and quickly began to overtake her in the polls, it was her team that suggested claiming that Obama was not an American citizen, that he had been born in Africa.
7 News Stories from 2008 that PROVE Hillary Started Obama 'Birtherism' - Media is LYING!
The Hillary birther controversy is not going away. It is impossible to overstate the level of hypocrisy emanating from Hillary Clinton when it comesthepoliticalinsider.com
"2007 - Hillary’s chief strategist, Mark Penn, wrote a now-infamous campaign memo laying out his overall plan to win the election:
“I cannot imagine America electing a president during a time of war who is not at his center fundamentally American in his thinking and in his values.” Penn proposed targeting Obama’s “lack of American roots.”
Again, this only proves that initiating the fake Russia-Trump connection story to smear Trump and win the election was not the 1st / only time the Clintons have engaged in lies, deceit, and smear campaigns.
Now Durham ties Sussmann to the Clintons while indicting him for lying to the FBI about working for the Clintons and the DNC.
Durham Indictment Is in and It's Big After All
redstate.com
It figures you are still too stupid to figure it out even now, troll...
Durham's report put an official end to Hillary's hoax & Obama's / Biden's / Democrat's failed coup ... and your parroted false narrative.
Pete7469 said:
You still got no evidence or statue that was violated bed wetter. An accusation of a crime with zero evidence on top of it does not make Trump guilty of anything.Pete7469 said:
Wrong shit stain. Not a single statue was indicated.
That's how law works TURD.
You have to have EVIDENCE. Clear Evidence, something TANGIBLE or at least credible testimony. Then you have to INDICATE WHAT SPECIFIC CFR or USC was violated. You name the USC or CFR, present the evidence and I'll never post here again
You still got no evidence or statue that was violated bed wetter. An accusation of a crime with zero evidence on top of it does not make Trump guilty of anything.
Period, end of fucking discussion bed wetter.
You still got no evidence or statue that was violated bed wetter. An accusation of a crime with zero evidence on top of it does not make Trump guilty of anything.
Period, end of fucking discussion bed wetter.
Convicted in what court, and what evidence was presented bed wetter?How about 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the first degree ( NY Penal Law § 175.10)?
Bye-bye sucker!
Convicted in what court, and what evidence was presented bed wetter?
Eat a dick. I knew you'd never be able to meet the goal post because it doesn't exist you fucking jabbering imbecile.
.
www.documentcloud.org
Are you still here?Convicted in what court, and what evidence was presented bed wetter?
Eat a dick. I knew you'd never be able to meet the goal post because it doesn't exist you fucking jabbering imbecile.
.
Are you still here?
Pete7469 said:
Wrong shit stain. Not a single statue was indicated.
That's how law works TURD.
You have to have EVIDENCE. Clear Evidence, something TANGIBLE or at least credible testimony. Then you have to INDICATE WHAT SPECIFIC CFR or USC was violated. You name the USC or CFR, present the evidence and I'll never post here again
Still here?
Still here?
