Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
www.bloomberg.com
It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.
why would trump need lawyers to defend him in a "trial" that requires no evidence to convict?Trump Struggles to Find Lawyers as Impeachment Trial Nears
President Donald Trump, on the eve of facing a historic second impeachment trial for inciting the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol last week, is having trouble finding a legal team to defend him.
What Attorney that has an ounce of integrity would represent this treasonous buffoon? Not mentioning the problem with getting paid.
There are plenty of judiciary in the Senate.It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.
That isn't where it's tried.
Anybody who signs on needs to ask for money up front, no matter how competent they are or are not.Trump Struggles to Find Lawyers as Impeachment Trial Nears
President Donald Trump, on the eve of facing a historic second impeachment trial for inciting the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol last week, is having trouble finding a legal team to defend him.
What Attorney that has an ounce of integrity would represent this treasonous buffoon? Not mentioning the problem with getting paid.
That's a very rare animal. ...Attorney that has an ounce of integrity
It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.
That isn't where it's tried.
Anybody who voluntarily comes within his orbit deserves the damage that will come to their career, dignity, profession, credibility and self respect.
Good luck, tough shit.
It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.
That isn't where it's tried.
There are plenty of judiciary in the Senate.It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.
That isn't where it's tried.
It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.
That isn't where it's tried.
I realize that. The judiciary in this case is the Senate. At least half of the Senate doesn’t care one bit about the facts.
In case you haven’t noticed, the judiciary won’t be conducting the trialIt’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.
In case you haven’t noticed, the judiciary won’t be conducting the trialIt’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.
