The DNC Can Pick Whoever they want for their Nominee, and They can Use any Money Donated to Biden-Harris for that Ticket

I believe there is a strong chance it will happen just that way.

The USSC won't step in in the middle of an election. Even if one accepts the grand conspiracy of the USSC being full of MAGA radicals who will do whatever Trump wants them to, why would Trump care which particular Democrat he beats in 2024? If he does care, he certainly would never admit that he can't beat someone.

My guess is they pick Newsom or Whitmer, and let Harris keep the second banana slot as long as she keeps her mouth shut. Or have a Newsom/Whitmer ticket and offer Harris a seat on the Supreme Court if she endorsed them, and spend all of Biden's money.

Don't forget that many Biden pledges have been frozen, so those monies can be easily and legally be given by the donors to the new ticket. A new ticket could raise money pretty quick.


I wish I agreed. But the USSC didn't do anything about the 2020 election, so why would they step in this time?

I dont' think anyone would have their mind changed. the Democratic Party has successfully taught its followers a new definition of "democracy," which is "anything the Democratic Party approves of."

Your thinking is predicated on the assumption Biden leaves the race. I am assuming he stays in until announced otherwise. I can not possibly envision a scenario where the vast majority of pledged delegates to the convention all break those pledges and go for someone else when the candidate to whom they have been pledged is the incumbent president.
 
It's funny how the party that is having a conniption over Republicans confiscating our democracy, is now wanting to deny 15 million fellow party members of their votes. That's exactly what the totalitarians that we call Democrats are doing. Then after they shit all over our democracy, they have the balls to bitch about losing it. MAGA
 
Why would they not be able to? Who would stop them?

The courts? Were you not around in 2020? Democrats did whatever they wanted, and no court was willing to take any cases trying to stop them. They found some prodecural excuse to never let an election skeptic get their day in court. Not a single jury heard such a case.
200w.gif
 
Why would they not be able to? Who would stop them?

The courts? Were you not around in 2020? Democrats did whatever they wanted, and no court was willing to take any cases trying to stop them. They found some prodecural excuse to never let an election skeptic get their day in court. Not a single jury heard such a case.

Ah but we understand the game now.

Press charges in a deep red state. Pick the right judge and area.

Done.
 
Why would they not be able to? Who would stop them?

The courts? Were you not around in 2020? Democrats did whatever they wanted, and no court was willing to take any cases trying to stop them. They found some prodecural excuse to never let an election skeptic get their day in court. Not a single jury heard such a case.
Ever since Biden has been president he regularly breaks laws doing things, knowing that court cases against him would take years. By then he would have long done what he wanted to do. He even does this crap after Supreme Court rulings. Talk about dictators and wanting to take democracy away!
 
They could run Barack again too. He ignored the natural born citizen requirement, the 22nd Amendment prohibition on more than 2 terms should be child's play
Yes, of course they could. He would likely win, I'm not gonna lie. The media would hail him as the savior, and compared to Biden, he was Ronald Reagan on the economy.
 
We cannot think about this issue objectively, because there are real and currently running presidential candidates involved. Let's try to be objective for one post.

Take a hypothetical example: A popular candidate runs for president and he clearly is not qualified by the few requirements of the Constitution. Say he was born in Poland and only thirty-three years ago. His family moved to the states before he could talk and he never learned Polish. He was raised in Massachussets and says "da Beahs" and all that stuff. American as apple pie, but not native born. Very young regular Shelton Cooper with two PhD's and has served as a governer and a Senator. Massachusets turned around under his leadership and he is a very popular candidate.

If he ran and won in a landslide, the USSC would not rule that he could not be president. Because then what happens? The USSC says who does become president? Would they pick the Polish guy's VP pick, or the other candidate in the race? Either way would be an invitation to chaos.

His lawyers would come up with some reason that he should still be president. They could say that the Equal Protection Clause now supercedes those requirements, or they could say that it is up to the states to make sure the electors they chuse vote for a qualified candidate, therefore whoever they vote for is presumed qualified. Doesn't have to make sense, the USSC would grasp at any straw.

end objectivity here

One thing I learned by losing a couple of bets on here is to never believe something will or will not happen based on the assumption tha tthe rule of law would stop Democrats from doing exactly what they want to do.
 
Your thinking is predicated on the assumption Biden leaves the race. I am assuming he stays in until announced otherwise. I can not possibly envision a scenario where the vast majority of pledged delegates to the convention all break those pledges and go for someone else when the candidate to whom they have been pledged is the incumbent president.
I think you are correct about that.

My post refutes the assumption that it somehow cannot be done. I don't believe it will be done.

The Democrats will go into November with a hopeless candidate, who was already failing when members of his party crippled him politically by calling for him to step down.
 
Kamala Harris will be the presidential nominee. There is only one possible person to run as her VP. if Michelle Obama is qualified to run for president, Jill Biden is qualified to run for VP.
 
There is the traitorous Biden family accepting money from our enemies for policy decisions. We could talk about that
Nah, you can't. That's why you just make stuff up. Fake everything. Serve the Lord of LIes. LieForTheParty. And so on.

Remember, you can't gaslight anyone who isn't a fascist cult pisshead like yourself.

Come on, cult boi. Your party's liars in congress just spent two years, using every dirty trick in the book ,trying to find something, anything to tag Biden with. They failed to find even the slightest hint of wrongdoing by Joe Biden. Anyone saying otherwise is lying for the glory of fascism, and will suffer the eternal consequences of that.
 
Kamala Harris will be the presidential nominee.
Just stop.

If there's one thing the billionaires hate more than a tax hike, it's the thought of a black woman as president.

The anti-Biden crusade is largely an anti-Harris crusade by the billionaires and media moguls.
 
Just stop.

If there's one thing the billionaires hate more than a tax hike, it's the thought of a black woman as president.

The anti-Biden crusade is largely an anti-Harris crusade by the billionaires and media moguls.
Who do you think will be the Democratic nominee?
 
Nah, you can't. That's why you just make stuff up. Fake everything. Serve the Lord of LIes. LieForTheParty. And so on.

Remember, you can't gaslight anyone who isn't a fascist cult pisshead like yourself.

Come on, cult boi. Your party's liars in congress just spent two years, using every dirty trick in the book ,trying to find something, anything to tag Biden with. They failed to find even the slightest hint of wrongdoing by Joe Biden. Anyone saying otherwise is lying for the glory of fascism, and will suffer the eternal consequences of that.
I think when you have the Attorney General running cover for you you can get away with just about anything. You cultists don't care how traitorous your party is. You definitely should pull your tongue out of Biden's ass.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom