- Dec 6, 2009
- 78,488
- 4,342
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #141
How could a non-existent entity have armed forces?
Under the mandate, Britain was supposed to be their defensive force. Britain cut and run leaving Palestinian civilians under the attack of Israel's military.
This is a blunt lie, Under the mandate Britain was supposed to maintain peace , it wasn't their obligation to side with the Palestinians or the Jews. The Arabs and the Jews did not want the British around.
The British tried to reach a peaceful resolution , when they have seen that it is not an option , they got out.
And It was a good decision to leave , why would they stay and risk their lives for people who obviously don't want them there...
'Palestinian civilians under the attack of Israel's military'
Another blunt lie , there was a civil war going on, even before the British left both sides were attacking each other.
Only After the British left the neighboring Arab countries joined the fight to help the Palestinians, with the goal of wiping Israel of the map.
Britain violated the League of Nations covenant. That was the source of violence.
"Civil war" was a term coined by Israel. There was no civil war.