Of course what happened to Germany in WWII is irrelevant to this conflict. What is relevant is that land cannot be taken by the threat or use of force.
Perhaps that is why the 1949 armistice agreements did not establish or change any borders. Borders would denote land ownership. However, the armistice lines were specifically not to be political of territorial borders.
Palestine was not chopped into three pieces and given away. It was divided into three occupations with the "Palestine question" to be addressed at a later date.
You said land couldn't be taken by force after 1928. The USSR took that German land after 1928. How is that irrelevant?
How does that relate to the Israel Palestine conflict?
You brought up the KelloggBriand Pact.
Like it means something.
It doesn't.