Mrs. M.
Man Feed Guest Writer
- Nov 2, 2015
- 739
- 393
- 940
One USMB blogger wrote a story this morning about a journalist whose articles exposed the Clinton's. He was found dead in his home from a self-inflicted gun shot wound to the head. Several months ago I decided to retire from writing but I've had a change of heart since reading the story about this journalist. It was the response that took me by surprise. Clinton supporters complained that the story of this man's mysterious death had been reported earlier this month. By their standards it was old news. The same excuse has been used for Benghazi before. Where is the outrage?
Are these not the same people who have gone on ad nauseum about an audio tape of Donald Trump's private discussion with another man some 11 years ago? Granted Mr. Trump's comment was indefensible but 11 years ago?
Let's talk about the pertinent issues and review the history and character of each candidate:
There are only two reasons that a man or woman would decide to run for public office.
1. For love of their country and fellow citizens, they are willing to sacrifice their own privacy, their own personal interests and career in order to offer their service to their country and fellow countrymen.
2. For love of themselves and their own inner circle. They see public office as an opportunity to use the power and position it offers them, to peddle favors to the highest bidder in exchange for money therein making themselves rich.
Donald Trump is a very wealthy man. He doesn't need money. He could have remained in the private sector and chose to spend time with his grandchildren and enjoyed the fruits of his own labor. He sees that the country is in serious trouble and realizes that what effects America will also effect his family. There is no history of treason in Trump's background. No history of exploiting the American people. No history of Trump aiding and abetting the enemy in exchange for cash.
The same cannot be said of the Clinton's.
An Editorial Review - Year of the Rat: How Clinton compromised National Security for Chinese cash by Edward Timberlake and William C. Triplett II
The Editor writes:
While many political journalists largely considered the second term of Bill Clinton's presidency in terms of his romantic interludes, Edward Timperlake and William C. Triplett II follow up on one of the more controversial scandals of the 1996 reelection campaign.
The Democratic National Committee was eventually forced to return $2.8 million in illegal contributions, much of it from foreign nationals, and much of it brought to the party by fundraising executive John Huang.
Huang originally represented U.S. interests for the Riady family, a powerful family of Indonesian businessmen with close ties to the Communist Chinese government. James Riady had been a "Friend of Bill" since 1977, and the two authors all but insinuate that the Riadys "scouted" Clinton--whether as an unwitting dupe, a sleeper agent, or merely an exploitable opportunist is never quite clear--and helped underwrite his bid for the White House. Why? So they could get John Huang a Commerce Department appointment... one that came with a top-secret security clearance.
Timperlake and Triplett gather together an astonishing--and largely convincing--mass of evidence that the Clinton-Gore administration "has made a series of Faustian bargains and policy blunders that have allowed a hostile power to further its aims in Washington." In addition to the potential security breach represented by Huang, they document numerous policy decisions that risk strengthening the technological and military power of Communist China, power that might well be used against the United States in the future.
1996 crisis involving Chinese communist missiles fired toward Taiwan. Following the deployment of U.S. aircraft carriers to the region, Trie showed up in Washington, delivering $460,000 to the President Clinton's Legal Defense Fund -- and a letter, delivered to the White House, regarding the Taiwan crisis. The provocative letter stated, in part [verbatim], "Any negative outcomes of the U.S. decision in the China issue will affect your administration position, especially in the campaign year... If the U.S. recognizes "one China" policy, don't such conduct will cause a conflict for intervening in China's internal affairs?..."
In response, the Clinton National Security Council drafted a letter to Trie, assuring the communist Chinese that the aircraft carriers were simply a "redeployment," and "not intended as a threat to the PRC."
Charlie Trie, as the authors found in Asia, is member of a Chinese Triad crime gang that has close ties to the Chinese Communist Party. Trie's money contact in Macau, who wired more than $1 million to Trie's U.S. account, most of which is believed to have ended up in Clinton Defense Fund and Democratic Party campaign coffers, is Ng Lapseng, a Triad mobster and Chinese communist official. In fact, Ng visited the White House and attended a number of Democratic Party fund-raisers in Washington, sitting next to President Clinton at some events. - end quote
Some excellent books have been written on the subject which explains clearly how the Clinton's assisted Red China:
Stealth Invasion: Red Chinese Maritime Operations in North America (2001)
__________
Bill's wife has the same record of aiding and abetting the enemy in exchange for financial gain:
DNC Feared Russia-Uranium Clinton Foundation Scandal
Quoting Breitbart:
The hidden $2.35 million in Clinton Foundation donations from the former Russian uranium chief were part of a larger $145 million given from nine uranium investors involved in the deal approved by Hillary Clinton to transfer 20% of all U.S. uranium to the Russian government.
To date, Hillary Clinton has not received a single question from a national journalist about her decision to transfer 20% of all U.S. uranium to Putin’s Russia as nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to her family foundation. -end quote
____
Mrs. Clinton decides to transfer 20% of all U.S. uranium to Vladimir Putin's Russia and nine Russian investors donate $145 million dollars to her foundation. Where is the outrage? While Mrs. Clinton's media friends have repeatedly failed to find a connection between Trump and Russia, why have they failed to find the connection as to why the Russians have contributed more money to her foundation that all other foreigners combined?
While it is necessary to point out the Clinton's have serious character flaws concerning the cover up of Bill Clinton's history of rape, one must ask where the outrage is for the historical rape of our national security, our land, resources, tax dollars and the future of our country.
Mrs. Clinton enjoys full time security at the expense of the American taxpayer. According to Former Secret Service Agent Gary Byrne who authored the book, "Crisis of Character," no one wants the job. Mrs. Clinton is known for her filthy mouth and psychotic behavior. Mr. Byrne recounts the story of Mrs. Clinton throwing a Bible, hitting the head of one colleague in what he described as "an episode of rage."
Her behavior is reprehensible and her disrespect for Secret Service Agents is ample evidence of her hatred for this country and those who have laid their lives on the line to protect it. Mrs. Clinton is an enemy of the United States of America. One would think that the Clinton's should be investigated and put on trial for treason and murder. One would think...
FBI Interview: Hillary Clinton 'so Contemptuous' of Security Detail, Many Agents Quit or Sought Reassignment - Breitbart
The silence is deafening.
Call it the death of outrage.
Last edited:
