The Death Of Education

[CHAZBUKOWSKI]

bahahahahah! What a load of unmitigated horse excrement. Simply amazing that a trumplodyte has the gall to claim Dems do not have the literary backing for their beliefs, when little trumpies very well may be the most ignorant, uneducated, self-delusional f-tards to ever come down the pike. The only way they can still reconcile their support for him is through that ignorance and stupidity.

Can you provide the three or four books from which you have gleaned your geopolitical positions????


Just three or four......

There isn't 3 or 4. Probably more like 30 or 40. And that is my business, not some little message board uber f-tard to critique. You actually think your views are nuanced and based in knowledge, but rather, you are just another in a long line of sh1tbirds, with an bizarrely inflated self-grandeur.

And, yes, I realize this is where you gloat that I cannot even name 3 or 4 books, thinking you have won the internet cuumstain of the internet award.

 

[rightwinger]

bahahahahah! What a load of unmitigated horse excrement. Simply amazing that a trumplodyte has the gall to claim Dems do not have the literary backing for their beliefs, when little trumpies very well may be the most ignorant, uneducated, self-delusional f-tards to ever come down the pike. The only way they can still reconcile their support for him is through that ignorance and stupidity.

Can you provide the three or four books from which you have gleaned your geopolitical positions????


Just three or four......

There isn't 3 or 4. Probably more like 30 or 40. And that is my business, not some little message board uber f-tard to critique. You actually think your views are nuanced and based in knowledge, but rather, you are just another in a long line of sh1tbirds, with an bizarrely inflated self-grandeur.

And, yes, I realize this is where you gloat that I cannot even name 3 or 4 books, thinking you have won the internet cuumstain of the internet award.

The interesting part is that Political Chic does not form political opinions. She just cut and pastes the opinions of others and adopts them as her own.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

bahahahahah! What a load of unmitigated horse excrement. Simply amazing that a trumplodyte has the gall to claim Dems do not have the literary backing for their beliefs, when little trumpies very well may be the most ignorant, uneducated, self-delusional f-tards to ever come down the pike. The only way they can still reconcile their support for him is through that ignorance and stupidity.

Can you provide the three or four books from which you have gleaned your geopolitical positions????


Just three or four......

There isn't 3 or 4. Probably more like 30 or 40. And that is my business, not some little message board uber f-tard to critique. You actually think your views are nuanced and based in knowledge, but rather, you are just another in a long line of sh1tbirds, with an bizarrely inflated self-grandeur.

And, yes, I realize this is where you gloat that I cannot even name 3 or 4 books, thinking you have won the internet cuumstain of the internet award.

The interesting part is that Political Chic does not form political opinions. She just cut and pastes the opinions of others and adopts them as her own.

And you do what?

 

[rightwinger]

bahahahahah! What a load of unmitigated horse excrement. Simply amazing that a trumplodyte has the gall to claim Dems do not have the literary backing for their beliefs, when little trumpies very well may be the most ignorant, uneducated, self-delusional f-tards to ever come down the pike. The only way they can still reconcile their support for him is through that ignorance and stupidity.

Can you provide the three or four books from which you have gleaned your geopolitical positions????


Just three or four......

There isn't 3 or 4. Probably more like 30 or 40. And that is my business, not some little message board uber f-tard to critique. You actually think your views are nuanced and based in knowledge, but rather, you are just another in a long line of sh1tbirds, with an bizarrely inflated self-grandeur.

And, yes, I realize this is where you gloat that I cannot even name 3 or 4 books, thinking you have won the internet cuumstain of the internet award.

The interesting part is that Political Chic does not form political opinions. She just cut and pastes the opinions of others and adopts them as her own.

And you do what?

I never cut and paste ANYTHING and claim it as my opinion

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

bahahahahah! What a load of unmitigated horse excrement. Simply amazing that a trumplodyte has the gall to claim Dems do not have the literary backing for their beliefs, when little trumpies very well may be the most ignorant, uneducated, self-delusional f-tards to ever come down the pike. The only way they can still reconcile their support for him is through that ignorance and stupidity.

Can you provide the three or four books from which you have gleaned your geopolitical positions????


Just three or four......

There isn't 3 or 4. Probably more like 30 or 40. And that is my business, not some little message board uber f-tard to critique. You actually think your views are nuanced and based in knowledge, but rather, you are just another in a long line of sh1tbirds, with an bizarrely inflated self-grandeur.

And, yes, I realize this is where you gloat that I cannot even name 3 or 4 books, thinking you have won the internet cuumstain of the internet award.

The interesting part is that Political Chic does not form political opinions. She just cut and pastes the opinions of others and adopts them as her own.

And you do what?

I never cut and paste ANYTHING and claim it as my opinion

Neither does she.

 

[Andylusion]

1. Today, the education industry uses minimal educating as a beard for its true purpose: turning out 'Lock-Step Liberals' who obligingly vote for policies they can neither explain nor defend.
In due credit, no other government agency has been as efficient nor successful as government schooling.

2. Need proof? One such would be to ask any Liberal/Democrat to state which three or four books have informed their geopolitical outlook.....you've get the proverbial deer-in-the-headlights face.

Or....simply look at the outcome of government schooling:
"For Blazquez, watching American youth embrace avowed socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders for president, strikes him as “absurd.” It is the end result, he says, of the cultural marxist education and media propaganda that has anesthetized too many Americans who do not defend the values that made America exceptional."
Cuban-American Filmmaker Warns America Is Morphing Into Communist Country



3. It goes wayyyyyyy back.
Just as Stalin was far smarter than his vassal, Franklin Roosevelt, the Soviets put the poison pill into our system with John Dewey.

The Soviet Potemkin Villages worked like a charm…..on the least insightful: American Progressives and Liberals…..the same sort who vote Democrat today.

One of the most significant dupes is the man who has had more of an effect on American children than even Santa Clause…….Communist John Dewey. He dictated how our children would be ‘educated’ in government schools, for a totalitarian society.


In 1928, Dewey, on his trip to the Soviet, was given the full Potemkin treatment. He laughed off the possibility of his being manipulated…”the warning, which appears humorous in retrospect by my kindly friends is that I would be fooled by being taken to show places…” Of course, immediately upon returning, he wrote a six part series for The New Republic, the political ‘font of all knowledge’ of the American left. “My mind was in a whirl of new impressions in those early days in Leningrad. Readjustment was difficult, and I lived somewhat dazed….” Impressions of Soviet Russia, by John Dewey.


John Dewey was a communist dupe, a Potemkin Progressive. Yet, this man is the greatest single influence on American schoolchildren; his books have been used to train generations of teachers. Even while the Russian civil war was still going on (some seven million killed between 1917 and 1921), Dewey’s books were translated into Russian by the Bolsheviks: they immediately recognized the importance of his ideas to the Soviet collective communist state.

1. 1918, “School’s of Tomorrow,” published in Russian.
2. 1919, “How We Think,” published in Russian.
3. 1920, “The School and Society,” published in Russian.
4. 1921, “Democracy and Education,” published in Russian. The English version, of course, became a bible at Columbia Teacher’s College.

And there's more.....even worse.

4. But there's this news: today is the anniversary of the death of the Marxist who controls teacher's college.....

"Paulo Freire, (born Sept. 19, 1921, Recife, Braz.—died May 2, 1997, São Paulo), Brazilian educator. His ideas developed from his experience teaching Brazil’s peasants to read. His interactive methods, which encouraged students to question the teacher, often led to literacy in as little as 30 hours of instruction. In 1963 he was appointed director of the Brazilian National Literacy Program, but he was jailed following a military coup in 1964. He went into exile, returning in 1979 to help found the Workers Party. His seminal work was Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1970). "
Britannica.com


Dewey and Freire have poisoned the minds of untold numbers of American children.

It is impossible to see any way back for the nation.

To be fair... many smart people thought Socialism was the future of the world. So just to keep things in context, many people were not back then, as informed as we are today about how ridiculously stupid, and what a universal and undeniable failure Socialism is.

Of course... that begs the question how we can have so many brainless fools today. Back then, I can see why people jumped on the Socialism Bandwagon. But there is no excuse for supporting socialism today.

 

[Andylusion]

bahahahahah! What a load of unmitigated horse excrement. Simply amazing that a trumplodyte has the gall to claim Dems do not have the literary backing for their beliefs, when little trumpies very well may be the most ignorant, uneducated, self-delusional f-tards to ever come down the pike. The only way they can still reconcile their support for him is through that ignorance and stupidity.

Can you provide the three or four books from which you have gleaned your geopolitical positions????


Just three or four......

There isn't 3 or 4. Probably more like 30 or 40. And that is my business, not some little message board uber f-tard to critique. You actually think your views are nuanced and based in knowledge, but rather, you are just another in a long line of sh1tbirds, with an bizarrely inflated self-grandeur.

And, yes, I realize this is where you gloat that I cannot even name 3 or 4 books, thinking you have won the internet cuumstain of the internet award.

The interesting part is that Political Chic does not form political opinions. She just cut and pastes the opinions of others and adopts them as her own.

And you do what?

I never cut and paste ANYTHING and claim it as my opinion

I've never seen her do that either.
I've seen her cut and paste, and then comment on it. But always with citations.

She's a fantastic poster honestly. She neither spams links pointlessly, nor does she just come on with something unbelievably stupid with zero support like.......

"Conservatives.......Would you lick a doorknob for $1 ?"

I don't see her doing mindless insult threads with no backing, nor do I see her just doing a cut and paste, without doing her own comments.

Seems like a great poster to me.

 

[PoliticalChic]

bahahahahah! What a load of unmitigated horse excrement. Simply amazing that a trumplodyte has the gall to claim Dems do not have the literary backing for their beliefs, when little trumpies very well may be the most ignorant, uneducated, self-delusional f-tards to ever come down the pike. The only way they can still reconcile their support for him is through that ignorance and stupidity.

Can you provide the three or four books from which you have gleaned your geopolitical positions????


Just three or four......

There isn't 3 or 4. Probably more like 30 or 40. And that is my business, not some little message board uber f-tard to critique. You actually think your views are nuanced and based in knowledge, but rather, you are just another in a long line of sh1tbirds, with an bizarrely inflated self-grandeur.

And, yes, I realize this is where you gloat that I cannot even name 3 or 4 books, thinking you have won the internet cuumstain of the internet award.

Just as I suggested......you are simply one more ignorant, vulgar, lying boilerplate example of government schooling.

.... and in your post I can hear the snuffling of the ubiquitous pigs of the Left…

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Today, the education industry uses minimal educating as a beard for its true purpose: turning out 'Lock-Step Liberals' who obligingly vote for policies they can neither explain nor defend.
In due credit, no other government agency has been as efficient nor successful as government schooling.

2. Need proof? One such would be to ask any Liberal/Democrat to state which three or four books have informed their geopolitical outlook.....you've get the proverbial deer-in-the-headlights face.

Or....simply look at the outcome of government schooling:
"For Blazquez, watching American youth embrace avowed socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders for president, strikes him as “absurd.” It is the end result, he says, of the cultural marxist education and media propaganda that has anesthetized too many Americans who do not defend the values that made America exceptional."
Cuban-American Filmmaker Warns America Is Morphing Into Communist Country



3. It goes wayyyyyyy back.
Just as Stalin was far smarter than his vassal, Franklin Roosevelt, the Soviets put the poison pill into our system with John Dewey.

The Soviet Potemkin Villages worked like a charm…..on the least insightful: American Progressives and Liberals…..the same sort who vote Democrat today.

One of the most significant dupes is the man who has had more of an effect on American children than even Santa Clause…….Communist John Dewey. He dictated how our children would be ‘educated’ in government schools, for a totalitarian society.


In 1928, Dewey, on his trip to the Soviet, was given the full Potemkin treatment. He laughed off the possibility of his being manipulated…”the warning, which appears humorous in retrospect by my kindly friends is that I would be fooled by being taken to show places…” Of course, immediately upon returning, he wrote a six part series for The New Republic, the political ‘font of all knowledge’ of the American left. “My mind was in a whirl of new impressions in those early days in Leningrad. Readjustment was difficult, and I lived somewhat dazed….” Impressions of Soviet Russia, by John Dewey.


John Dewey was a communist dupe, a Potemkin Progressive. Yet, this man is the greatest single influence on American schoolchildren; his books have been used to train generations of teachers. Even while the Russian civil war was still going on (some seven million killed between 1917 and 1921), Dewey’s books were translated into Russian by the Bolsheviks: they immediately recognized the importance of his ideas to the Soviet collective communist state.

1. 1918, “School’s of Tomorrow,” published in Russian.
2. 1919, “How We Think,” published in Russian.
3. 1920, “The School and Society,” published in Russian.
4. 1921, “Democracy and Education,” published in Russian. The English version, of course, became a bible at Columbia Teacher’s College.

And there's more.....even worse.

4. But there's this news: today is the anniversary of the death of the Marxist who controls teacher's college.....

"Paulo Freire, (born Sept. 19, 1921, Recife, Braz.—died May 2, 1997, São Paulo), Brazilian educator. His ideas developed from his experience teaching Brazil’s peasants to read. His interactive methods, which encouraged students to question the teacher, often led to literacy in as little as 30 hours of instruction. In 1963 he was appointed director of the Brazilian National Literacy Program, but he was jailed following a military coup in 1964. He went into exile, returning in 1979 to help found the Workers Party. His seminal work was Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1970). "
Britannica.com


Dewey and Freire have poisoned the minds of untold numbers of American children.

It is impossible to see any way back for the nation.

To be fair... many smart people thought Socialism was the future of the world. So just to keep things in context, many people were not back then, as informed as we are today about how ridiculously stupid, and what a universal and undeniable failure Socialism is.

Of course... that begs the question how we can have so many brainless fools today. Back then, I can see why people jumped on the Socialism Bandwagon. But there is no excuse for supporting socialism today.

That was prior to the century of slaughter.

Today not knowing can no longer be the excuse.

 

[PoliticalChic]

bahahahahah! What a load of unmitigated horse excrement. Simply amazing that a trumplodyte has the gall to claim Dems do not have the literary backing for their beliefs, when little trumpies very well may be the most ignorant, uneducated, self-delusional f-tards to ever come down the pike. The only way they can still reconcile their support for him is through that ignorance and stupidity.

Can you provide the three or four books from which you have gleaned your geopolitical positions????


Just three or four......

There isn't 3 or 4. Probably more like 30 or 40. And that is my business, not some little message board uber f-tard to critique. You actually think your views are nuanced and based in knowledge, but rather, you are just another in a long line of sh1tbirds, with an bizarrely inflated self-grandeur.

And, yes, I realize this is where you gloat that I cannot even name 3 or 4 books, thinking you have won the internet cuumstain of the internet award.

The interesting part is that Political Chic does not form political opinions. She just cut and pastes the opinions of others and adopts them as her own.

And you do what?

I never cut and paste ANYTHING and claim it as my opinion

I've never seen her do that either.
I've seen her cut and paste, and then comment on it. But always with citations.

She's a fantastic poster honestly. She neither spams links pointlessly, nor does she just come on with something unbelievably stupid with zero support like.......

"Conservatives.......Would you lick a doorknob for $1 ?"

I don't see her doing mindless insult threads with no backing, nor do I see her just doing a cut and paste, without doing her own comments.

Seems like a great poster to me.

That was very kind of you.
Thank you.

 

[rightwinger]

bahahahahah! What a load of unmitigated horse excrement. Simply amazing that a trumplodyte has the gall to claim Dems do not have the literary backing for their beliefs, when little trumpies very well may be the most ignorant, uneducated, self-delusional f-tards to ever come down the pike. The only way they can still reconcile their support for him is through that ignorance and stupidity.

Can you provide the three or four books from which you have gleaned your geopolitical positions????


Just three or four......

There isn't 3 or 4. Probably more like 30 or 40. And that is my business, not some little message board uber f-tard to critique. You actually think your views are nuanced and based in knowledge, but rather, you are just another in a long line of sh1tbirds, with an bizarrely inflated self-grandeur.

And, yes, I realize this is where you gloat that I cannot even name 3 or 4 books, thinking you have won the internet cuumstain of the internet award.

The interesting part is that Political Chic does not form political opinions. She just cut and pastes the opinions of others and adopts them as her own.

And you do what?

I never cut and paste ANYTHING and claim it as my opinion

I've never seen her do that either.
I've seen her cut and paste, and then comment on it. But always with citations.

She's a fantastic poster honestly. She neither spams links pointlessly, nor does she just come on with something unbelievably stupid with zero support like.......

"Conservatives.......Would you lick a doorknob for $1 ?"

I don't see her doing mindless insult threads with no backing, nor do I see her just doing a cut and paste, without doing her own comments.

Seems like a great poster to me.

She is a shameless troll twisting quotes to provoke outrage.
Her posts are, for the most part, rambling screeds that nobody actually reads

 

[Gdjjr]

Seems like a great poster to me.

Define great. Intellectual honesty is severely lacking in all of her posts. One sided conversations she holds with narrow minded walls isn't really great, IMO. She likes to hear her head rattle and get patted on the back for it while she waits for her RNC check and next "talking points" to arrive-

But, she comes across as cute.

 

[Andylusion]

bahahahahah! What a load of unmitigated horse excrement. Simply amazing that a trumplodyte has the gall to claim Dems do not have the literary backing for their beliefs, when little trumpies very well may be the most ignorant, uneducated, self-delusional f-tards to ever come down the pike. The only way they can still reconcile their support for him is through that ignorance and stupidity.

Can you provide the three or four books from which you have gleaned your geopolitical positions????


Just three or four......

There isn't 3 or 4. Probably more like 30 or 40. And that is my business, not some little message board uber f-tard to critique. You actually think your views are nuanced and based in knowledge, but rather, you are just another in a long line of sh1tbirds, with an bizarrely inflated self-grandeur.

And, yes, I realize this is where you gloat that I cannot even name 3 or 4 books, thinking you have won the internet cuumstain of the internet award.

The interesting part is that Political Chic does not form political opinions. She just cut and pastes the opinions of others and adopts them as her own.

And you do what?

I never cut and paste ANYTHING and claim it as my opinion

I've never seen her do that either.
I've seen her cut and paste, and then comment on it. But always with citations.

She's a fantastic poster honestly. She neither spams links pointlessly, nor does she just come on with something unbelievably stupid with zero support like.......

"Conservatives.......Would you lick a doorknob for $1 ?"

I don't see her doing mindless insult threads with no backing, nor do I see her just doing a cut and paste, without doing her own comments.

Seems like a great poster to me.

She is a shameless troll twisting quotes to provoke outrage.
Her posts are, for the most part, rambling screeds that nobody actually reads

Most people don't read much at all. For my part, I read her posts.

 

[Andylusion]

Seems like a great poster to me.

Define great. Intellectual honesty is severely lacking in all of her posts. One sided conversations she holds with narrow minded walls isn't really great, IMO. She likes to hear her head rattle and get patted on the back for it while she waits for her RNC check and next "talking points" to arrive-

But, she comes across as cute.

Give me an example.

 

[basquebromance]

college used to be education soaked in beer

now its indoctrination soaked in fear

 

[PoliticalChic]

college used to be education soaked in beer

now its indoctrination soaked in fear

I worked very hard in college, one of the very best around.
But I have found that the greatest part of my learning came afterward.
And continues apace.

 

[rightwinger]

college used to be education soaked in beer

now its indoctrination soaked in fear

I worked very hard in college, one of the very best around.
But I have found that the greatest part of my learning came afterward.
And continues apace.

Cut and paste can be so tricky

 

[Gdjjr]

Give me an example.

E V E R Y P O S T- what part of that do you not understand?

Giving but one side of anything is intellectually dishonest when pretending to be good at what you do- and she claims to be never wrong- which in and of itself is true- but, good at what you do means ALL evidence has to be presented before one can arrive at an objective conclusion. Talking to a narrow minded wall renders narrow conclusions which is what she gives which have AN objective not to be confused with BEING objective.

IF one isn't objective they are subjective which means they ignore intentionally, or accidentally over look *an* item maybe two. E V E R Y T I M E is intentional which is intellectual dishonesty and gives NO credibility to one's ability to think through anything-

 

[initforme]

Mathematics is what needs to be pushed along with science....history, civics, the others......meh.

 

[Andylusion]

Give me an example.

E V E R Y P O S T- what part of that do you not understand?

Giving but one side of anything is intellectually dishonest when pretending to be good at what you do- and she claims to be never wrong- which in and of itself is true- but, good at what you do means ALL evidence has to be presented before one can arrive at an objective conclusion. Talking to a narrow minded wall renders narrow conclusions which is what she gives which have AN objective not to be confused with BEING objective.

IF one isn't objective they are subjective which means they ignore intentionally, or accidentally over look *an* item maybe two. E V E R Y T I M E is intentional which is intellectual dishonesty and gives NO credibility to one's ability to think through anything-

Give me a specific clear example. One specific clear example that you would point to.