mamooth
Diamond Member
Well, we have all the polls, and all the other good signs, but you just go comfort yourself in whatever way you need to. Maybe dig up some of those faked polls bankrolled by Peter Thiel. That always cheers you up.
The Beginning Of The End
- Thread starter PoliticalChic
- Start date
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #22
Why are you unable to string words together to form a cogent post in opposition to my well researched, documented and linked posts?
Must be the similarity you find in Kamala Carswell, huh?
Bet you are another government school grad.
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #23
Under Trump gasoline was about $1.80 a gallon….but you voted against thatLook at you being the one who cares about what Lizzo says
Nutjobs, every single one of you
Under Trump we were energy independent….but you voted against that.
Under Trump 80% of illegal alien were kept in Mexico….but you voted against that.
Under Trump inflation was 1.4%….but you voted against that.
Under Trump crime was far lower, as were homicides….but you voted against that.
Under Trump Iran was kept in a box….but you voted against that.
Under Trump America had an airbase near both China and Iran….but you voted against that.
Under Trump our President wasn’t on China’s payroll….but you voted against that.
Under Trump cartels weren’t free to operate….but you voted against that.
Under Trump government didn’t favor racism, CRT, gender mutilation….but you voted against that.
Under Trump we didn’t have confiscatory tax policy….but you voted against that.
Under Trump we didn’t have a government working with big tech to end free speech….but you voted against that.
Under Trump, Putin didn’t invade Ukraine….but you voted against that
Under Trump, the savages of Hamas didn’t dare to slaughter concert goers….but you voted against that.
Under Trump, peace in the Middle East….but you voted against that.
Under Trump, three peace treaties between Israel and their Arab neighbors…..but you voted against that.
Under Trump, securing our borders and not waiving in murderous MS13 gang members…..but you voted against that
Under Trump we avoided some 100,000 fatal drug overdoses…but you voted against that.
Under Trump we didn’t have lawfare, a legal system corrupted to use fake charges against political enemies….but you voted for Lawfare.
Under Trump, his side didn’t try to imprison or assassinate opponents.
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #24
Let's talk about Kamala CarswellDamn you just can't stop talking about Lizzo for some reason
- Contrary to the term itself, Kamala has stated that illegal aliens are not criminals
- She has stated that she wishes to decriminalize illegally crossing the border, similar to the way Democrats have decriminalized shoplifting.
- She has argued against, not the death penalty, just the death penalty for cop killers
- She favors defunding the police
- She authored a fund to bail out domestic terrorists, called the Minnesota Freedom Fund.
- Joining Communist Bernie Sanders in “Medicare For All,” in which she argues for all private health insurance. BTW, some 220 million Americans have private health insurance, 65% of the population
- Kamala plans to include all the illegals in the Medicare plan
- Eliminate and ban all fracking which produces 64% of the total crude oil produced in the United States in 2023.
- She supported a law which bans arrests for shoplifting under $950.
- She supports indicting Israel for war crimes against Hamas
- Believes in banning internal combustion engines, allowing only electric vehicles.
- As Attn’y General, her office supported Prop 57 that put rapists and murders back on the street after serving a fraction of their sentence
- Supported a state law that keeps parents from knowing about the indoctrination of their children toward gender transition
- When the nation was wracked by Democrat-fueled George Floyd riots Kamala said the riots should not stop:
“As a U.S. senator from California from 2017 to 2021, she had a more leftist voting record even than socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders, Vermont independent.” Harris had a more leftist voting record in Senate than Sanders
Kamala wrote “Trump supports a national abortion ban.” Of course that is a lie. Kamala Harris na Instagramie : "Donald Trump supports a national abortion ban. President @JoeBiden and I will do everything in our power to stop him and restore women's reproductive freedom."
Kamala was the deciding vote on the $1.9T American Rescue Plan that caused this inflation. Now prices are up nearly 30%.
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #25
.....and a Marxist who favors genocide.
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #26
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #27
No vulgarity, please.She's been drawing big crowds without Lizzo with no problem so seems you're dumber than shit
The thread is for adults only.
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #28
Let's check:
Under Trump gasoline was about $1.80 a gallon….but you voted against that
Under Trump we were energy independent….but you voted against that.
Under Trump 80% of illegal alien were kept in Mexico….but you voted against that.
Under Trump inflation was 1.4%….but you voted against that.
Under Trump crime was far lower, as were homicides….but you voted against that.
Under Trump Iran was kept in a box….but you voted against that.
Under Trump America had an airbase near both China and Iran….but you voted against that.
Under Trump our President wasn’t on China’s payroll….but you voted against that.
Under Trump cartels weren’t free to operate….but you voted against that.
Under Trump government didn’t favor racism, CRT, gender mutilation….but you voted against that.
Under Trump we didn’t have confiscatory tax policy….but you voted against that.
Under Trump we didn’t have a government working with big tech to end free speech….but you voted against that.
Under Trump, Putin didn’t invade Ukraine….but you voted against that
Under Trump, the savages of Hamas didn’t dare to slaughter concert goers….but you voted against that.
Under Trump, peace in the Middle East….but you voted against that.
Under Trump, three peace treaties between Israel and their Arab neighbors…..but you voted against that.
Under Trump, securing our borders and not waiving in murderous MS13 gang members…..but you voted against that
Under Trump we avoided some 100,000 fatal drug overdoses…but you voted against that.
Under Trump we didn’t have lawfare, a legal system corrupted to use fake charges against political enemies….but you voted for Lawfare.
- Under Trump, his side didn’t try to imprison or assassinate opponents.
excalibur
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 24,632
- 48,953
- 2,290
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #30
Polls, Predictions, and Prognostication.
In full disclosure, I don't make predictions, I follow the great Yogi: “It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future.”
1. “Survey finds Hillary Clinton has ‘more than 99% chance’ of winning election over Donald Trump” Saturday 5 November 2016
The man who predicted 49 out of 50 states in 2012 has said who will win on Tuesday
The Princeton Election Consortium found Ms Clinton has a projected 312 electoral votes across the country and only 270 are needed to win
2. The Russians colluded to support their bribe partner, Bill's wife.....
...here's why:
October 25, 2016...NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?
Augustine_
Platinum Member
- Aug 13, 2019
- 11,092
- 7,328
- 940
You mean the guy who's Presidency ended in economic collapse, countless dead Americans, and rampant rioting in the streets?
Magnus
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 13,296
- 10,468
- 2,138
Nope. John Dewey never said those words. And your link goes to “page not found”
Weren’t you warned about copy/paste without checking? Who are you trying to impress with this garbage?
Let me guess - you were home schooled and then graduated from Trump U? Yeah, thought so.
Is this what passes for “intelligence “ in MAGA retard circles? No wonder the orange loser loves his uneducated retards.
Last edited:
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #33
Nope. John Dewey never said those words. And your link goes to “page not found”
Weren’t you warned about copy/paste without checking? Who are you trying to impress with this garbage?
Let me guess - you were home schooled and then graduated from Trump U? Yeah, thought so.
Is this what passes for “intelligence “ in MAGA retard circles? No wonder the orange loser loves his uneducated retards.
Of course he did, and believed every syllable of it.
May I add to that the fact that Communist John Dewey talked the Socialist Party into changing their name to Liberal, hence the fabrication we have today.
How Socialist John Dewey Switched Labels
by Jim Peron
- Pity the poor liberal. And I mean the real liberal. Not the modern watered-down socialist who calls himself a liberal but a real, honest, classical liberal. There is so much confusion over the term and real liberals have allowed fake liberals to get away with this subtle destruction of the language.
- The classical liberals proposed laissez faire and this led to prosperity. The economics of 19th century liberalism brought about a major increase in the standard of living of all people. Thus real liberalism produced the effects which socialists dreamed their system would provide.
- Many socialists wanted prosperity and thought socialism would lead to such results faster than classical liberalism. But at the same time many socialists saw their ideology as a means of grabbing power for themselves and it was the power, not the promised prosperity, which attracted them.
- [Socialists] knew that liberalism had a good reputation with the working classes — the very audience which they were targeting. The idea was to adopt the name liberal to describe socialism. Socialism, as socialism, was harder to sell. But by taking a name they did not deserve they felt they could make political gains on the backs of classical liberalism. And they did.
- In the United States, where liberalism most clearly reversed its meaning, in common parlance, it was the socialist John Dewey who openly promoted the idea of stealing the liberal label. Dewey, in his book Individualism Old and Newargued that liberal individualism had in fact disappeared and been replaced by state capitalism and that collectivism already existed in America.
- But he noted the collectivism of that day was a “collectivism of profit” and not a “collectivism of planning”. He said the only way liberalism could return to its true meaning was to adopt socialism as the means by which liberal goals would be achieved. As he put it central economic planning was “the sole method of social action by which liberalism can realize its professed aims.”
- Peter Witonski, in his essay The Historical Roots of American Planningsaid: “Dewey was the first to argue that the world ‘liberal’—which once stood for liberal, free-market capitalism—could better serve the needs of social democracy in America than the world ‘socialism’.
- The liberalism of Adam Smith was out-of-date Dewey argued.” In his book Liberalism and Social Action, Dewey suggested that the goals of a free society could best be obtained “only by a reversal of the means to which early liberalism was committed.” But the means of liberalism were fundamentally connected to the basic premises of liberalism. A reversal of means, while keeping similar goals in mind, also changed the premises of liberalism. The “new wisdom” of Keynes with the “reversal of means” of Dewey really meant stealing the name of liberalism and applying it to another very different species. The famed economist Joseph Schumpeter noted that “the enemies of private enterprise have thought it wise to appropriate its label.”
- Today a great deal of confusion reigns because socialists decided to deceptively call their own ideology liberal. And, to a very large degree, the academics who wrote the recent texts on liberalism were socialists. Hence they were quite willing to pretend that socialism was a modern form of classical liberalism.
- [Classical] liberal describes individuals supporting free markets, private property, profit management and limited governments. o-called “liberals” support socialism, state ownership, bureaucratic management and statism.
http://orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/liberal_confusion.htm
Democracy & free markets vs socialism
http://forum.rottentomatoes.com/topic/show/1369713?page=2
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #34
Nope. John Dewey never said those words. And your link goes to “page not found”
Weren’t you warned about copy/paste without checking? Who are you trying to impress with this garbage?
Let me guess - you were home schooled and then graduated from Trump U? Yeah, thought so.
Is this what passes for “intelligence “ in MAGA retard circles? No wonder the orange loser loves his uneducated retards.
John Dewey’s destructive legacy
December 14, 2016
FacebookTwitterMessengerCopy LinkMessageEmailShare
“You can’t make socialists out of individualists. Children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society, which is coming, where everyone is interdependent.”
Would it be shocking to find out that the above quote comes from the most influential education philosopher in the history of education in the United States?"
John Dewey’s destructive legacy - Restoration NewsMedia
“You can’t make socialists out of individualists. Children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society, which is coming, where everyone is interdependent.” Would it be shocking to find out …
restorationnewsmedia.com
So you are a government school grad?
Tutored by John Dewey himself?
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #35
Nope. John Dewey never said those words. And your link goes to “page not found”
Weren’t you warned about copy/paste without checking? Who are you trying to impress with this garbage?
Let me guess - you were home schooled and then graduated from Trump U? Yeah, thought so.
Is this what passes for “intelligence “ in MAGA retard circles? No wonder the orange loser loves his uneducated retards.
You can’t make socialists out of individualists. Children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society, which is coming, where everyone is interdependent.” -John Dewey
#justsayin #historymatters #ResistLikeits1776
Edited · 229w
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #36
John DeweyNope. John Dewey never said those words. And your link goes to “page not found”
Weren’t you warned about copy/paste without checking? Who are you trying to impress with this garbage?
Let me guess - you were home schooled and then graduated from Trump U? Yeah, thought so.
Is this what passes for “intelligence “ in MAGA retard circles? No wonder the orange loser loves his uneducated retards.
“We make a religion of our education. . . . Faith in education signifies nothing less than belief in the possibility of deliberate direction of the formation of human disposition and intelligence.”
“Schools do have a role – and an important one – in production of social change.”
“You can’t make Socialists out of individualists—children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society which is coming, where everyone is interdependent.”
Key Quotes on Public Secular Education - CultureWatch
Warnings about modern statist education: There are many good public schools and public school teachers out there. But many schools and teachers have made it…
billmuehlenberg.com
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #37
Nope. John Dewey never said those words. And your link goes to “page not found”
Weren’t you warned about copy/paste without checking? Who are you trying to impress with this garbage?
Let me guess - you were home schooled and then graduated from Trump U? Yeah, thought so.
Is this what passes for “intelligence “ in MAGA retard circles? No wonder the orange loser loves his uneducated retards.
Using Schools to Reconstruct Society
Dewey’s movement had a new vision for schools. He wanted to use schools as instruments for the reconstruction of society. Dewey didn’t want to educate children to think for themselves: “Children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society which is coming where everyone is interdependent.” [1]
Ellis Washington, “John Dewey’s Dunces,” WND.com, last modified January 25, 2013, John Dewey's dunces * WorldNetDaily * by Ellis Washington.
PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #38
Nope. John Dewey never said those words. And your link goes to “page not found”
Weren’t you warned about copy/paste without checking? Who are you trying to impress with this garbage?
Let me guess - you were home schooled and then graduated from Trump U? Yeah, thought so.
Is this what passes for “intelligence “ in MAGA retard circles? No wonder the orange loser loves his uneducated retards.
Dewey was a communist, a Bolshevik.....just as you are.
His views differ from American views by 180 degrees, just as yours do.
I don't. The superpowers are stage managing everything because they understand that everybody, including themselves lose in a world war.
America is desperately trying to find a way to eliminate Russia from the mix because America is outgunned by the Brics alliance. But America still has an alternative to military aggression in peaceful coexistence.
Magnus
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 13,296
- 10,468
- 2,138
LOL Haven’t your lesson yet? You really think I would get distracted by you vomiting junk all over this thread to forget my earlier response? And you wonder why I call you a retard.Of course he did, and believed every syllable of it.
May I add to that the fact that Communist John Dewey talked the Socialist Party into changing their name to Liberal, hence the fabrication we have today.
How Socialist John Dewey Switched Labels
by Jim Peron
- Pity the poor liberal. And I mean the real liberal. Not the modern watered-down socialist who calls himself a liberal but a real, honest, classical liberal. There is so much confusion over the term and real liberals have allowed fake liberals to get away with this subtle destruction of the language.
- The classical liberals proposed laissez faire and this led to prosperity. The economics of 19th century liberalism brought about a major increase in the standard of living of all people. Thus real liberalism produced the effects which socialists dreamed their system would provide.
- Many socialists wanted prosperity and thought socialism would lead to such results faster than classical liberalism. But at the same time many socialists saw their ideology as a means of grabbing power for themselves and it was the power, not the promised prosperity, which attracted them.
- [Socialists] knew that liberalism had a good reputation with the working classes — the very audience which they were targeting. The idea was to adopt the name liberal to describe socialism. Socialism, as socialism, was harder to sell. But by taking a name they did not deserve they felt they could make political gains on the backs of classical liberalism. And they did.
- In the United States, where liberalism most clearly reversed its meaning, in common parlance, it was the socialist John Dewey who openly promoted the idea of stealing the liberal label. Dewey, in his book Individualism Old and Newargued that liberal individualism had in fact disappeared and been replaced by state capitalism and that collectivism already existed in America.
- But he noted the collectivism of that day was a “collectivism of profit” and not a “collectivism of planning”. He said the only way liberalism could return to its true meaning was to adopt socialism as the means by which liberal goals would be achieved. As he put it central economic planning was “the sole method of social action by which liberalism can realize its professed aims.”
- Peter Witonski, in his essay The Historical Roots of American Planningsaid: “Dewey was the first to argue that the world ‘liberal’—which once stood for liberal, free-market capitalism—could better serve the needs of social democracy in America than the world ‘socialism’.
- The liberalism of Adam Smith was out-of-date Dewey argued.” In his book Liberalism and Social Action, Dewey suggested that the goals of a free society could best be obtained “only by a reversal of the means to which early liberalism was committed.” But the means of liberalism were fundamentally connected to the basic premises of liberalism. A reversal of means, while keeping similar goals in mind, also changed the premises of liberalism. The “new wisdom” of Keynes with the “reversal of means” of Dewey really meant stealing the name of liberalism and applying it to another very different species. The famed economist Joseph Schumpeter noted that “the enemies of private enterprise have thought it wise to appropriate its label.”
- Today a great deal of confusion reigns because socialists decided to deceptively call their own ideology liberal. And, to a very large degree, the academics who wrote the recent texts on liberalism were socialists. Hence they were quite willing to pretend that socialism was a modern form of classical liberalism.
- [Classical] liberal describes individuals supporting free markets, private property, profit management and limited governments. o-called “liberals” support socialism, state ownership, bureaucratic management and statism.
http://orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/liberal_confusion.htm
Democracy & free markets vs socialism
www.freerepublic.com
http://forum.rottentomatoes.com/topic/show/1369713?page=2
You made up a quote that you attributed to John Dewey. Even your fake link went nowhere.
Since your entire thread is based on him and you pretend to be an expert…prove that he said those words from an unbiased source. Not just vomiting pablum from retard right wing sources.
As always - I am sure since you are a lying retard, you won’t. But hey, prove me wrong. Go
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Democrat Dick Durbin goes all out to bring down Trump nominee
- Started by lennypartiv
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
You can now read about the origins of Covid on the White House website
- Started by lennypartiv
- Replies: 3
Latest Discussions
-
The video of Israel slaughtering its own citizens on Oct 7 is trending again on X- Latest: Andrew_Jackson_FTW
-
-
-
-