The Dam is Breaking on the Vaccines

[Catman51]

Still trying to save face … I guess once a liar your always a liar …In get it you didn’t address one thing I posted … I may have got you confuse with another poster on the covid… I thought it was you… to lie
Is to mislead intentionally I never mislead …… by having the wrong guy or lied you republicans lie so much it’s hard to determine who’s who … still you did’t answer one thing I posted you went in another direction trying to prove me as a liar … as you can see here I had the wrong guy … there was no lying here just a mistake on which person I was talking to …

Hey stupid, I said that I don't care what lies you pose as everything you post is a lie. Try to keep up you baboon

 

[billyerock123]

Hey stupid, I said that I don't care what lies you pose as everything you post is a lie. Try to keep up you baboon

Well you liars are all alike when confronted with your lies, you lie some more good going dick smoker …

 

[Catman51]

Well you liars are all alike when confronted with your lies, you lie some more good going dick smoker …

describing yourself again, idiot?

 

[gipper]

Well you liars are all alike when confronted with your lies, you lie some more good going dick smoker …

Here is news you likely know nothing of, but those of us informed know about.

I suggest you seek treatments for the contamination you’ve suffered, from taking the phony vax.

55 Undeclared Chemical Elements — Including Heavy Metals — Found in COVID Vaccines​

Argentine scientists identified 55 chemical elements — not listed on package inserts — in a study of the six major COVID-19 vaccine brands. The research, which confirms previous studies, sparked calls for transparency and further investigation.
55 Undeclared Chemical Elements — Including Heavy Metals — Found in COVID Vaccines

 

[AHZ]

I was stunned to see the story of Maddie de Garay featured on Fox News Morning just now. They are much, much more moderate than Tucker Carlson, who featured Maddie's story 18 months ago.

In short, Maddie was signed up for the Pfizer vaccine trial and suffered a severe systemic reaction shortly after. Since, she has been in a wheelchair and on a feeding tube. Her mother says Pfizer has not been in touch with them.

This vaccine should have NEVER been cleared for children and young adults--and is highly questionable for anyone.

Man, the dam is breaking fast. Thank God.

Mom details 12-year-old daughter's extreme reactions to COVID vaccine, says she’s now in wheelchair

An Ohio mother is speaking out about her 12-year-old daughter who suffered from extreme reactions and nearly died after volunteering for the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine trial.

www.foxnews.com

Trump and RFKJr. 2024!

destroy the horrors of state capture by big pharma!

 

[billyerock123]

Here is news you likely know nothing of, but those of us informed know about.

I suggest you seek treatments for the contamination you’ve suffered, from taking the phony vax.

55 Undeclared Chemical Elements — Including Heavy Metals — Found in COVID Vaccines​

Argentine scientists identified 55 chemical elements — not listed on package inserts — in a study of the six major COVID-19 vaccine brands. The research, which confirms previous studies, sparked calls for transparency and further investigation.
55 Undeclared Chemical Elements — Including Heavy Metals — Found in COVID Vaccines

really??? the defender??? give me a break... they aren't factual IN ANY WAY ...

• Overall, we rate The Defender a strong conspiracy and quackery-level advocacy group that frequently promotes unsupported claims. We also rate them low for factual reporting due to the promotion of propaganda and several failed fact checks.
• tell us when you have a credible source of information these guys are conspiracy theorists at best

what do you Bozo's do, do you find the first outfit that fits your cause and say that's our source boy oh boy ... do some Damn research before you post this bullshit site... that has been shot down by every fact checker on the planet ... you're making a big fool of yourself

---

 

[gipper]

really??? the defender??? give me a break... they aren't factual IN ANY WAY ...

• Overall, we rate The Defender a strong conspiracy and quackery-level advocacy group that frequently promotes unsupported claims. We also rate them low for factual reporting due to the promotion of propaganda and several failed fact checks.
• tell us when you have a credible source of information these guys are conspiracy theorists at best

what do you Bozo's do, do you find the first outfit that fits your cause and say that's our source boy oh boy ... do some Damn research before you post this bullshit site... that has been shot down by every fact checker on the planet ... you're making a big fool of yourself

---

I knew you’d attack the report, because that’s all pharma salesmen can do. However The Defender isn’t the source document.

Here is the source document. Fact check it. Lol.
At Least 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements Found in COVID-19 Vaccines from AstraZeneca, CanSino, Moderna, Pfizer, Sinopharm and Sputnik V, with Precise ICP-MS | International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research

 

[Catman51]

really??? the defender??? give me a break... they aren't factual IN ANY WAY ...

• Overall, we rate The Defender a strong conspiracy and quackery-level advocacy group that frequently promotes unsupported claims. We also rate them low for factual reporting due to the promotion of propaganda and several failed fact checks.
• tell us when you have a credible source of information these guys are conspiracy theorists at best

what do you Bozo's do, do you find the first outfit that fits your cause and say that's our source boy oh boy ... do some Damn research before you post this bullshit site... that has been shot down by every fact checker on the planet ... you're making a big fool of yourself

---

Well, if this liar claims it to be wrong, it must be true. He has been consistently wrong with all his claims and his alleged facts, so this just follows in his pattern of disinformation.

 

[billyerock123]

I knew you’d attack the report, because that’s all pharma salesmen can do. However The Defender isn’t the source document.

Here is the source document. Fact check it. Lol.
At Least 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements Found in COVID-19 Vaccines from AstraZeneca, CanSino, Moderna, Pfizer, Sinopharm and Sputnik V, with Precise ICP-MS | International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research

sorry I'm not a pharma salesman nice try to try and lie your way out of your stupidity here ... you keep posting conspiracy Theorist all the time... this new one isn't any better than your last one ...

Immunologists and virologists complained on social media around 6 months ago about a recently-created sham scientific journal called "International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research" (IJVTPR) which was supposedly created by anti-vaxxers and intended to release anti-vax research papers. Since then I have noticed one specific IJVTPR paper, "Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19" frequently cited in anti-vax forums all over the internet. More recently, a member of my family provided the following link to this same paper as proof that reputable peer-reviewed medical research shows the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines to be dangerous: https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF~1.PDF

My own mild debunking:

1. The URL is misleading: The impressive .gov URL (from Nevada Division of Public and Behavioral Health), which lends credibility to the link and paper, is only possible because the creators of this paper submitted the paper, as all members of the general public were allowed to do without scientific or government review, to an 8/10/2021 zoom meeting about Covid-19 vaccination by the Nevada Board of Health, and the .gov website lists all formally submitted comments from the public as PDFs in their online meeting minutes/notes: NVBOH2021
2. No reputable experts authored the paper:No professional immunologist, virologist, or vaccine specialist took part in the authoring of this paper. It turns out the paper's primary authors are:
   • Stephanie Seneff, a senior Computer Science and AI (no professional expertise in medicine, vaccines, immunology, or virology) researcher at MIT who, according to her Wikipedia entry, "...began publishing controversial papers in low-impact, open access journals on biology and medical topics; the articles have received 'heated objections from experts in almost every field she's delved into'..."
   • Greg Nigh, a naturopathic physician (not an MD, DO or PhD, degree from "National College of Natural Medicine"), licensed acupuncturist and founder of Immersion Health in Portland, Oregon.
3. No reputable expert peer review found: Like most of the other papers created and posted by IJVTPR, I can find zero approving peer review by reputable experts in the subject matter of this paper. IJVTPR claims to be an open journal which allows the scientific community to potentially peer review each paper, but materials published by IJVTPR are not necessarily peer reviewed, and in practice, as far as I can tell, their papers are basically never approvingly peer reviewed by real medical and scientific experts.
4. No new research or data: The paper does not contain any medical research or data of its own, and instead bills itself as a "review" of research and data created by other experts.
5. Rehash of existing anti-vax misinformation gambits: The paper is a Gish gallop, a litany of many of the same anti-vax misinformation points refuted by professionals and experts in the subject. For example, it brings up the tired debunked argument that ADE is a unique problem with vaccines instead of the studied medical issue already well-known to professional immunologists and virologists. As another example, it refers to several embarrassingly disreputable sham papers, like the J Bart Classen paper which claimed without evidence that the vaccines can cause prions disease

 

[Catman51]

sorry I'm not a pharma salesman nice try to try and lie your way out of your stupidity here ... you keep posting conspiracy Theorist all the time... this new one isn't any better than your last one ...

Immunologists and virologists complained on social media around 6 months ago about a recently-created sham scientific journal called "International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research" (IJVTPR) which was supposedly created by anti-vaxxers and intended to release anti-vax research papers. Since then I have noticed one specific IJVTPR paper, "Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19" frequently cited in anti-vax forums all over the internet. More recently, a member of my family provided the following link to this same paper as proof that reputable peer-reviewed medical research shows the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines to be dangerous: https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF~1.PDF

My own mild debunking:

1. The URL is misleading: The impressive .gov URL (from Nevada Division of Public and Behavioral Health), which lends credibility to the link and paper, is only possible because the creators of this paper submitted the paper, as all members of the general public were allowed to do without scientific or government review, to an 8/10/2021 zoom meeting about Covid-19 vaccination by the Nevada Board of Health, and the .gov website lists all formally submitted comments from the public as PDFs in their online meeting minutes/notes: NVBOH2021
2. No reputable experts authored the paper:No professional immunologist, virologist, or vaccine specialist took part in the authoring of this paper. It turns out the paper's primary authors are:
   • Stephanie Seneff, a senior Computer Science and AI (no professional expertise in medicine, vaccines, immunology, or virology) researcher at MIT who, according to her Wikipedia entry, "...began publishing controversial papers in low-impact, open access journals on biology and medical topics; the articles have received 'heated objections from experts in almost every field she's delved into'..."
   • Greg Nigh, a naturopathic physician (not an MD, DO or PhD, degree from "National College of Natural Medicine"), licensed acupuncturist and founder of Immersion Health in Portland, Oregon.
3. No reputable expert peer review found: Like most of the other papers created and posted by IJVTPR, I can find zero approving peer review by reputable experts in the subject matter of this paper. IJVTPR claims to be an open journal which allows the scientific community to potentially peer review each paper, but materials published by IJVTPR are not necessarily peer reviewed, and in practice, as far as I can tell, their papers are basically never approvingly peer reviewed by real medical and scientific experts.
4. No new research or data: The paper does not contain any medical research or data of its own, and instead bills itself as a "review" of research and data created by other experts.
5. Rehash of existing anti-vax misinformation gambits: The paper is a Gish gallop, a litany of many of the same anti-vax misinformation points refuted by professionals and experts in the subject. For example, it brings up the tired debunked argument that ADE is a unique problem with vaccines instead of the studied medical issue already well-known to professional immunologists and virologists. As another example, it refers to several embarrassingly disreputable sham papers, like the J Bart Classen paper which claimed without evidence that the vaccines can cause prions disease

As usual, you remain full of crap. If YOU don't like what it says, it must be wrong. Never a chance that you are an idiot and so invested in your own lies that you would even listen to what others might say. Typical of the feeble minded.

 

[gipper]

sorry I'm not a pharma salesman nice try to try and lie your way out of your stupidity here ... you keep posting conspiracy Theorist all the time... this new one isn't any better than your last one ...

Immunologists and virologists complained on social media around 6 months ago about a recently-created sham scientific journal called "International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research" (IJVTPR) which was supposedly created by anti-vaxxers and intended to release anti-vax research papers. Since then I have noticed one specific IJVTPR paper, "Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19" frequently cited in anti-vax forums all over the internet. More recently, a member of my family provided the following link to this same paper as proof that reputable peer-reviewed medical research shows the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines to be dangerous: https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF~1.PDF

My own mild debunking:

1. The URL is misleading: The impressive .gov URL (from Nevada Division of Public and Behavioral Health), which lends credibility to the link and paper, is only possible because the creators of this paper submitted the paper, as all members of the general public were allowed to do without scientific or government review, to an 8/10/2021 zoom meeting about Covid-19 vaccination by the Nevada Board of Health, and the .gov website lists all formally submitted comments from the public as PDFs in their online meeting minutes/notes: NVBOH2021
2. No reputable experts authored the paper:No professional immunologist, virologist, or vaccine specialist took part in the authoring of this paper. It turns out the paper's primary authors are:
   • Stephanie Seneff, a senior Computer Science and AI (no professional expertise in medicine, vaccines, immunology, or virology) researcher at MIT who, according to her Wikipedia entry, "...began publishing controversial papers in low-impact, open access journals on biology and medical topics; the articles have received 'heated objections from experts in almost every field she's delved into'..."
   • Greg Nigh, a naturopathic physician (not an MD, DO or PhD, degree from "National College of Natural Medicine"), licensed acupuncturist and founder of Immersion Health in Portland, Oregon.
3. No reputable expert peer review found: Like most of the other papers created and posted by IJVTPR, I can find zero approving peer review by reputable experts in the subject matter of this paper. IJVTPR claims to be an open journal which allows the scientific community to potentially peer review each paper, but materials published by IJVTPR are not necessarily peer reviewed, and in practice, as far as I can tell, their papers are basically never approvingly peer reviewed by real medical and scientific experts.
4. No new research or data: The paper does not contain any medical research or data of its own, and instead bills itself as a "review" of research and data created by other experts.
5. Rehash of existing anti-vax misinformation gambits: The paper is a Gish gallop, a litany of many of the same anti-vax misinformation points refuted by professionals and experts in the subject. For example, it brings up the tired debunked argument that ADE is a unique problem with vaccines instead of the studied medical issue already well-known to professional immunologists and virologists. As another example, it refers to several embarrassingly disreputable sham papers, like the J Bart Classen paper which claimed without evidence that the vaccines can cause prions disease

No one cares what a pharma salesman has to say.

 

[Catman51]

BTW, if this vaccine is so great, why has Fau-chi gotten covid for the third time after getting a series of six shots?

So much for believing those in power.

 

[billyerock123]

No one cares what a pharma salesman has to say.

nobody cares what a liar like you has to say ... when you can't prove what you say you make shit up which makes you a liar...

 

[Catman51]

nobody cares what a liar like you has to say ... when you can't prove what you say you make shit up which makes you a liar...

Still practicing projection, are you? And proving that you are not good at it. Surprise.

 

[gipper]

Still practicing projection, are you? And proving that you are not good at it. Surprise.

Your entire position is crumbling. We can only hope more big settlements are forthcoming.

Stop supporting tyranny. It’s unAmerican.
Former Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan employee who refused COVID-19 vaccine awarded $13 million

 

[gipper]

nobody cares what a liar like you has to say ... when you can't prove what you say you make shit up which makes you a liar...

The more you know the worse it gets.

Peer-Reviewed Study Reveals 1,236% Surge in Excess Cardiac Arrest Deaths Among 2 Million COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals
By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
98% of people in King County, WA (Seattle) took at least one COVID shot, and the data is not looking good.

A peer-reviewed study has found a jaw-dropping 1,236% surge in excess heart attack deaths among King County's 2.2 million residents.

2020: 11 excess heart attack deaths

2021: 75 excess heart attack deaths

2022: 111 excess heart attack deaths

2023: 147 excess heart attack deaths, a 1,236% increase compared to 2020.

Moreover, cardiac arrest deaths, in general, rose about 25% from 2020 to 2023. In the same time frame, King County's population shrunk slightly.

Reflecting on this alarming data, Dr. Peter McCullough said, “So it looks like the vaccines are the smoking gun.”
Peer-Reviewed Study Reveals 1,236% Surge in Excess Cardiac Arrest Deaths Among 2 Million COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals
https://open.substack.com/pub/peter...1236?r=8h2pj&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

 

[mamooth]

The more you know the worse it gets.

COVID causes all that.

Vaccines aren't 100% effective.

That is, the excess deaths are from ... having COVID.

Did the authors do a controlled study, comparing deaths of unvaxxed vs vaxxed? No. They just decided that since deaths occurred, it had to be vaccines. That is, they assumed their conclusion.

 

[Catman51]

COVID causes all that.

Vaccines aren't 100% effective.

That is, the excess deaths are from ... having COVID.

Did the authors do a controlled study, comparing deaths of unvaxxed vs vaxxed? No. They just decided that since deaths occurred, it had to be vaccines. That is, they assumed their conclusion.

remember, we were told at the start that the shots WERE 100% effective, which has proven to be a huge lie.

I remember a friend died in a motorcycle accident and it was declared covid related.

My son died of heart complications after getting this supposedly "safe" shot and it wasn't from covid.

These are not assumptions they are facts, and the shot advocates refuse to admit that they did not have all the facts on the subject. There are and were many deaths attribute4d to covid, all in an effort to scare people into compliance.

The advocates of the shot lied, period.

 

[mamooth]

remember, we were told at the start that the shots WERE 100% effective, which has proven to be a huge lie.

No, we weren't.

Come on, tell better lies.

These are not assumptions they are facts,

No, it's just you making crap up.

 

[Catman51]

No, we weren't.

Come on, tell better lies.

No, it's just you making crap up.

If you knew half as much as you think you do, you would still be a quarter wit. Not to mention having a convenient memory that excludes all facts that you don't want to acknowledge.

Proving that it is you who is making up crap, as usual.