The Czech Republic Нas Сriminalized Verbal Support for Russia's Actions in Ukraine

Alexandre Fedorovski

Gold Member
Dec 9, 2017
2,536
1,164
210
1645932974210.png


Public endorsement of Russian aggression in the "democratic" Czech Republic could lead to the arrest and conviction of supporters of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

"The Supreme State Prosecutor's Office deems it necessary to inform citizens that the current situation regarding the Russian Federation's attack on Ukraine may have implications for their freedom of speech.

Freedom of expression is constitutionally enshrined in Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms. Everyone has the right to express their views as they see fit. But even the FREEDOM OF SPEAK has its limits in a democratic state governed by the rule of law.

1645933716635.png


If someone publicly (including at demonstrations, on the Internet or social networks) expresses approval of the attacks of the Russian Federation on Ukraine (accepts or supports them), or in this context expresses support or praises the leaders of the Russian Federation, under certain conditions he also MAY face criminal liability," wrote Igor Strzhizh, chief prosecutor.

FROM THE AUTHOR:

Why doesn't Washington that so passionately loves liberal democratic rights and freedoms protest the violation of the fundamental human right to have his own opinion and to EXPRESS HIS VOICE?

SOURCE: Schvalujete ruský vpád na Ukrajinu? Státní zástupci vám posílají varování
 

Attachments

  • 1645933686440.png
    1645933686440.png
    94.2 KB · Views: 27
Last edited:
FDR was a democrat. So was the majority the slave owning south before and after the civil war. The one constant about the Democrats: Lying, conniving and pandering to their political base. They will sell sell humans, they will sell snowballs to eskimos. They will sell anything to get votes, they are the very example of demagogue carpet baggers. This is a perfect ideal Democrat:
 
View attachment 607878

Public endorsement of Russian aggression in the "democratic" Czech Republic could lead to the arrest and conviction of supporters of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

"The Supreme State Prosecutor's Office deems it necessary to inform citizens that the current situation regarding the Russian Federation's attack on Ukraine may have implications for their freedom of speech.

Freedom of expression is constitutionally enshrined in Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms. Everyone has the right to express their views as they see fit. But even the FREEDOM OF SPEAK has its limits in a democratic state governed by the rule of law.

View attachment 607889

If someone publicly (including at demonstrations, on the Internet or social networks) expresses approval of the attacks of the Russian Federation on Ukraine (accepts or supports them), or in this context expresses support or praises the leaders of the Russian Federation, under certain conditions he also MAY face criminal liability," wrote Igor Strzhizh, chief prosecutor.

FROM THE AUTHOR:

Why doesn't Washington that so passionately loves liberal democratic rights and freedoms protest the violation of the fundamental human right to have his own opinion and to EXPRESS HIS VOICE?

SOURCE: Schvalujete ruský vpád na Ukrajinu? Státní zástupci vám posílají varování

Yelling "FIRE" in a crowded theater is an exception to the First Amendment in the Constitution of the United States.

see: Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.[1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action"
 
Yelling "FIRE" in a crowded theater is an exception to the First Amendment in the Constitution of the United States.

see: Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.[1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action"
Progs do it every day. And have had success with it as it fits the globalist agendas. But now it is slowly coming back on them. Free speech has consequences we have heard endlessly from Progs. But now Progs are starting to punish other Progs.
 
Its contrary to my impression of the Czech people
All of the Czech political top brass were educated in the United States or Great Britain, where ALL of them were recruited by the secret services.

I know them all personally: they are EXTREMELY hypocritical and corrupt people. By the way, the Czech Republic is officially the most corrupt country in Central and Eastern Europe.
 
Yelling "FIRE" in a crowded theater is an exception to the First Amendment in the Constitution of the United States.

see: Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.[1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action"
:)))
 
I know democrats, they are very ones that would ban the usage of the word "WOLF". Yet, they are the ones that uses it the most. Racism this, homophobia that. We can't get a logical reasonable word in edgewise.
 
Last edited:
FDR was a democrat. So was the majority the slave owning south before and after the civil war. The one constant about the Democrats: Lying, conniving and pandering to their political base. They will sell sell humans, they will sell snowballs to eskimos. They will sell anything to get votes, they are the very example of demagogue carpet baggers. This is a perfect ideal Democrat:


Somehow no one talks about the fact that George Washington and his closest associates "owned" vast lands beyond the "red line" delineated by the British Crown, which threatened him if not with ruin, then with the loss of a huge "investment".

This is one of the carefully concealed reasons for the outbreak of the War of Independence from the British Empire.
 
FDR was a democrat. So was the majority the slave owning south before and after the civil war. The one constant about the Democrats: Lying, conniving and pandering to their political base. They will sell sell humans, they will sell snowballs to eskimos. They will sell anything to get votes, they are the very example of demagogue carpet baggers. This is a perfect ideal Democrat:


Yes, and most have changed their last names several times each to avoid being associated with 58 major slave traders...
 
Yelling "FIRE" in a crowded theater is an exception to the First Amendment in the Constitution of the United States.

see: Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.[1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action"

There are NO exceptions to the free political speech of the first amendment.
The prosecution of libel, slander, intent to wrongly incite violence, are NOT exceptions to the political speech of the first amendment.
That is because they are NOT political, and they are harmful, so it is the defense of the inherent rights of others that allow those acts to be prosecuted.

There is no such defense for the prosecution of those who would support Russia over the Ukraine.
The Russians are not the bad guys.
The provinces of Donetsk and Crimea should never have belonged to the Ukraine.
They have been ethnically Russian since 980 AD, and it was wrong for Khrushchev to bribe the Ukraine with these Russian provinces in 1955.
And the Ukraine is the criminal, having been stealing Russian oil and gas from Russian pipelines since 1992.
This has been proven in court and the Ukraine was convicted in the world court in 2012.
 
All of the Czech political top brass were educated in the United States or Great Britain, where ALL of them were recruited by the secret services.

I know them all personally: they are EXTREMELY hypocritical and corrupt people. By the way, the Czech Republic is officially the most corrupt country in Central and Eastern Europe.
I rather doubt that you know any of them
 
There are NO exceptions to the free political speech of the first amendment.
The prosecution of libel, slander, intent to wrongly incite violence, are NOT exceptions to the political speech of the first amendment.
That is because they are NOT political, and they are harmful, so it is the defense of the inherent rights of others that allow those acts to be prosecuted.

There is no such defense for the prosecution of those who would support Russia over the Ukraine.
The Russians are not the bad guys.
The provinces of Donetsk and Crimea should never have belonged to the Ukraine.
They have been ethnically Russian since 980 AD, and it was wrong for Khrushchev to bribe the Ukraine with these Russian provinces in 1955.
And the Ukraine is the criminal, having been stealing Russian oil and gas from Russian pipelines since 1992.
This has been proven in court and the Ukraine was convicted in the world court in 2012.
That's right. The Washington administration, if it is not stopped by some legal means or other, is dragging not only Central, Eastern and Western Europe into the war, but is also creating all the conditions for the beginning of the "hot phase" of the Second Civil War in the United States.

Their policy is clear: "They" don't need nations. They don't need the EU (Obama said it DIRECTLY at a private meeting at the American embassy in Prague).

They only want one billion people on the planet: the "chosen ones" and the attendants...
 
There are NO exceptions to the free political speech of the first amendment.
The prosecution of libel, slander, intent to wrongly incite violence, are NOT exceptions to the political speech of the first amendment.
That is because they are NOT political, and they are harmful, so it is the defense of the inherent rights of others that allow those acts to be prosecuted.

There is no such defense for the prosecution of those who would support Russia over the Ukraine.
The Russians are not the bad guys.
The provinces of Donetsk and Crimea should never have belonged to the Ukraine.
They have been ethnically Russian since 980 AD, and it was wrong for Khrushchev to bribe the Ukraine with these Russian provinces in 1955.
And the Ukraine is the criminal, having been stealing Russian oil and gas from Russian pipelines since 1992.
This has been proven in court and the Ukraine was convicted in the world court in 2012.
1645941164344.png


Gorlovka, which is controlled by the DNR, came under heavy artillery fire.

Between 6 a.m. and 7 a.m., Gorlovka, which is controlled by the DNR, came under heavy artillery fire from the Ukrainian Armed Forces.


According to official data from the Joint Centre for Control and Coordination of the Ceasefire and Stabilization of the Situation in the South-East of Ukraine (JCCC), 17 artillery strikes using 122 mm. heavy artillery were launched against Horlivka in just one hour.

https://avia.pro/sites/default/files/images/01_50.mp4

The video footage shows the aftermath of a series of powerful explosions that completely destroyed an oil depot containing hundreds of tons of petroleum products and lubricants. The explosions were so powerful that nearby homes and buildings were literally swept away, a fact borne out by the published video footage.

At the moment, representatives of the Luhansk People's Republic are not giving any comments on the scale of the destruction, casualties and victims, but this is one of the unprecedented attacks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the LNR.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top