The Cost of Israel

[P F Tinmore]

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Palestine is the homeland of the Jews.

Israel is an illegal entity that occupies Palestine.

 

[Marc39]

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Palestine is the homeland of the Jews.

Israel is an illegal entity that occupies Palestine.

Israel is the historic homeland of the Jews.

The League of Nations agreed...

Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country

Allah agrees...
Quran 5:20-21...

Remember Moses said to his people: 'O my people! Recall in remembrance the favor of Allah unto you, when He produced prophets among you, made you kings, and gave you what He had not given to any other among the peoples. O my people! Enter the holy land which Allah hath assigned unto you, and turn not back ignominiously, for then will ye be overthrown, to your own ruin.

Barack Obama agrees...:

Israel is a sovereign state, and the historic homeland of the Jewish people.

It should be clear to all that efforts to chip away at Israel's legitimacy will only be met by the unshakeable opposition of the United States. The slaughter of innocent Israelis is not resistance -- it's injustice

Remarks by the President to the United Nations General Assembly | The White House


Winston Churchill agreed...:

The Jews had Palestine before that indigenous population [the Arabs] came in and inhabited it

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Churchill-Jews-Friendship-Martin-Gilbert/dp/0805078800]Amazon.com: Churchill and the Jews: A Lifelong Friendship (9780805078800): Martin Gilbert: Books: Reviews, Prices & more[/ame]

The US Congress agrees...

The United States Congressional Record
1922 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
NATIONAL HOME FOR THE JEWISH PEOPLE JUNE 30, 1922
HOUSE RESOLUTION 360 - UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED

Palestine of today, the land we now know as Palestine, was peopled by the Jews from the dawn of history until the Roman era. It is the ancestral homeland of the Jewish people. They were driven from it by force by the relentless Roman military machine and for centuries prevented from returning. At different periods various alien people succeeded them but the Jewish race had left an indelible impress upon the land.

Today it is a Jewish country. Every name, every landmark, every monument and every trace of whatever civilization remaining there is still Jewish. And it has ever since remained a hope, a longing, as expressed in their prayers for these nearly 2,000 years. No other people has ever claimed Palestine as their national home. No other people has ever shown an aptitude or indicated a genuine desire to make it their homeland. The land has been ruled by foreigners. Only since the beginning of the modern Zionist effort may it be said that a creative, cultural, and economic force has entered Palestine. The Jewish Nation was forced from its natural home. It did not go because it wanted to.

A perusal of Jewish history, a reading of Josephus, will convince the most skeptical that the grandest fight that was ever put up against an enemy was put up by the Jew. He never thought of leaving Palestine. But he was driven out. But did he, when driven out, give up his hope of getting back? Jewish history and Jewish literature give the answer to the question. The Jew even has a fast day devoted to the day of destruction of the Jewish homeland.

Never throughout history did they give up hope of returning there. I am told that 90 per cent of the Jews today are praying for the return of the Jewish people to its own home. The best minds among them believe in the necessity of reestablishing their Jewish land. To my mind there is something prophetic in the fact that during the ages no other nation has taken over Palestine and held it in the sense of a homeland; and there is something providential in the fact that for 1,800 years it has remained in desolation as if waiting for the return of the people.

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0688123635/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=0688123627&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=0HX00TRZAFXPP1PG6MNR]Amazon.com: Israel: A History (9780688123635): Martin Gilbert: Books[/ame]

 

[Marc39]

.

Israel is an illegal entity that occupies Palestine.

Er, champ, you're a little out of date...

The Palestine entity, formally established and defined by Britain, was formaly abolished in 1948 with the termination of the Mandate.
Middle East historian Bernard Lewis

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Islam-History-People-Events-Middle/dp/0812695186/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1288144935&sr=8-1]Amazon.com: Islam in History: Ideas, People, and Events in the Middle East (9780812695182): Bernard Lewis: Books: Reviews, Prices & more[/ame]



D'oh!

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Palestine is the homeland of the Jews.

Israel is an illegal entity that occupies Palestine.

Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country

Yep, just like I said.

 

[Marc39]

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Israel is an illegal entity that occupies Palestine.

The League of Nations established Palestine as the Jewish homeland by multilateral treaty constituting international law...

Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country

The Avalon Project : The Palestine Mandate


Are the losers who raised you mentally ill, too?

 

[docmauser1]

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Palestine is the homeland of the Jews.

One of the aims of dumbass arab agitpropsters is to make other dumbass sheeple believe that, the historic palestine was as densely populated as it is now, when, as Karl Voss put it, "In 1882, there were fewer than 150,000 Arabs in the land. The great majority of the Arab population in recent decades were comparative newcomers - either late immigrants or descendents of persons that had immigrated into Palestine in the previous seventy years.", and recalling the Anglo-American Committee (1946) admission that, "One witnesses in Palestine not merely the impact of European culture upon the East, but also the impact of Western science and Western technology upon a semi-feudal civilization.", we can picture hordes of the stateless arab garbage, humping camels in to capitalize on the joovish development of the land. And then, of course, they had to declare it was all theirs all along as per their cult.

Israel is an illegal entity that occupies Palestine.

This is a madrasa-approved opinion, indeed. Anything to the contrary is heresy, which is not goddamn halal, punishable by (some, who cares?) fatwa.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Palestine is the homeland of the Jews.

One of the aims of dumbass arab agitpropsters is to make other dumbass sheeple believe that, the historic palestine was as densely populated as it is now, when, as Karl Voss put it, "In 1882, there were fewer than 150,000 Arabs in the land. The great majority of the Arab population in recent decades were comparative newcomers - either late immigrants or descendents of persons that had immigrated into Palestine in the previous seventy years.", and recalling the Anglo-American Committee (1946) admission that, "One witnesses in Palestine not merely the impact of European culture upon the East, but also the impact of Western science and Western technology upon a semi-feudal civilization.", we can picture hordes of the stateless arab garbage, humping camels in to capitalize on the joovish development of the land. And then, of course, they had to declare it was all theirs all along as per their cult.

Israel is an illegal entity that occupies Palestine.

This is a madrasa-approved opinion, indeed. Anything to the contrary is heresy, which is not goddamn halal, punishable by (some, who cares?) fatwa.

It is not an opinion at all. It is fact. If you look at the actual, legal borders you will find that Israel sits inside Palestine's borders. Israel has no borders of its own. Israel obtained its position in Palestine, and maintains it position in Palestine by military force.

What would that be if not an occupation?

 

[docmauser1]

Palestine is the homeland of the Jews.

One of the aims of dumbass arab agitpropsters is to make other dumbass sheeple believe that, the historic palestine was as densely populated as it is now, when, as Karl Voss put it, "In 1882, there were fewer than 150,000 Arabs in the land. The great majority of the Arab population in recent decades were comparative newcomers - either late immigrants or descendents of persons that had immigrated into Palestine in the previous seventy years.", and recalling the Anglo-American Committee (1946) admission that, "One witnesses in Palestine not merely the impact of European culture upon the East, but also the impact of Western science and Western technology upon a semi-feudal civilization.", we can picture hordes of the stateless arab garbage, humping camels in to capitalize on the joovish development of the land. And then, of course, they had to declare it was all theirs all along as per their cult.

Israel is an illegal entity that occupies Palestine.

This is a madrasa-approved opinion, indeed. Anything to the contrary is heresy, which is not goddamn halal, punishable by (some, who cares?) fatwa.

It is not an opinion at all.

Of course, it is.

It is fact.

Madrasa babble "It is fact"...

If you look at the actual, legal borders you will find that Israel sits inside Palestine's borders. Israel has no borders of its own. Israel obtained its position in Palestine, and maintains it position in Palestine by military force.

One of the aims of dumbass arab agitpropbulshitters is to make other dumbass sheeple believe that, "Israel has no borders of its own". It is a madrasa/mullah-approved opinion, which we, as sane folks, of course, don't have to buy. Has anyone ever read the resolution 242? For all intents and purposes the resolution 242 is fulfilled - a 1979 treaty with Egypt and a 1994 treaty with Jordan laid the borders respectively. Frankly, palestinians® should be expressing gratitude to jooze the former are given something to occupy for nothing, even though, the state of palistain is bad first and foremost for palestinians® themselves, but this is another story. Moreover, after dumbass arabs dissed the resolution 181, thumping subsequent resolutions is a rather pointless arab occupation. By the way, are palestinians® mentioned in the resolution 242 at all? Cue merry laughs, pass the beers.

What would that be if not an occupation?

An arab occupational occupation, of course.

 

[P F Tinmore]

One of the aims of dumbass arab agitpropsters is to make other dumbass sheeple believe that, the historic palestine was as densely populated as it is now, when, as Karl Voss put it, "In 1882, there were fewer than 150,000 Arabs in the land. The great majority of the Arab population in recent decades were comparative newcomers - either late immigrants or descendents of persons that had immigrated into Palestine in the previous seventy years.", and recalling the Anglo-American Committee (1946) admission that, "One witnesses in Palestine not merely the impact of European culture upon the East, but also the impact of Western science and Western technology upon a semi-feudal civilization.", we can picture hordes of the stateless arab garbage, humping camels in to capitalize on the joovish development of the land. And then, of course, they had to declare it was all theirs all along as per their cult.

This is a madrasa-approved opinion, indeed. Anything to the contrary is heresy, which is not goddamn halal, punishable by (some, who cares?) fatwa.

Of course, it is.Madrasa babble "It is fact"...One of the aims of dumbass arab agitpropbulshitters is to make other dumbass sheeple believe that, "Israel has no borders of its own". It is a madrasa/mullah-approved opinion, which we, as sane folks, of course, don't have to buy. Has anyone ever read the resolution 242? For all intents and purposes the resolution 242 is fulfilled - a 1979 treaty with Egypt and a 1994 treaty with Jordan laid the borders respectively. Frankly, palestinians® should be expressing gratitude to jooze the former are given something to occupy for nothing, even though, the state of palistain is bad first and foremost for palestinians® themselves, but this is another story. Moreover, after dumbass arabs dissed the resolution 181, thumping subsequent resolutions is a rather pointless arab occupation. By the way, are palestinians® mentioned in the resolution 242 at all? Cue merry laughs, pass the beers.

What would that be if not an occupation?

An arab occupational occupation, of course.

The 1949 armistice agreements specified the borders. They were: Lebanon and Palestine, Syria and Palestine, Jordan and Palestine, and Egypt and Palestine. None of these borders changed from before the 1948 war. There were no borders mentioned for Israel.

In the 1979 peace agreement between Israel and Egypt it said that Israel was to withdraw behind the Egypt/Palestine border. Look it up.

I have asked many times for someone to find any documentation showing Israel acquiring borders and, to date, nobody has found any.

 

[docmauser1]

One of the aims of dumbass arab agitpropsters is to make other dumbass sheeple believe that, the historic palestine was as densely populated as it is now, when, as Karl Voss put it, "In 1882, there were fewer than 150,000 Arabs in the land. The great majority of the Arab population in recent decades were comparative newcomers - either late immigrants or descendents of persons that had immigrated into Palestine in the previous seventy years.", and recalling the Anglo-American Committee (1946) admission that, "One witnesses in Palestine not merely the impact of European culture upon the East, but also the impact of Western science and Western technology upon a semi-feudal civilization.", we can picture hordes of the stateless arab garbage, humping camels in to capitalize on the joovish development of the land. And then, of course, they had to declare it was all theirs all along as per their cult.

This is a madrasa-approved opinion, indeed. Anything to the contrary is heresy, which is not goddamn halal, punishable by (some, who cares?) fatwa.

Of course, it is.Madrasa babble "It is fact"...One of the aims of dumbass arab agitpropbulshitters is to make other dumbass sheeple believe that, "Israel has no borders of its own". It is a madrasa/mullah-approved opinion, which we, as sane folks, of course, don't have to buy. Has anyone ever read the resolution 242? For all intents and purposes the resolution 242 is fulfilled - a 1979 treaty with Egypt and a 1994 treaty with Jordan laid the borders respectively. Frankly, palestinians® should be expressing gratitude to jooze the former are given something to occupy for nothing, even though, the state of palistain is bad first and foremost for palestinians® themselves, but this is another story. Moreover, after dumbass arabs dissed the resolution 181, thumping subsequent resolutions is a rather pointless arab occupation. By the way, are palestinians® mentioned in the resolution 242 at all? Cue merry laughs, pass the beers.

What would that be if not an occupation?

An arab occupational occupation, of course.

The 1949 armistice agreements specified the borders. They were: Lebanon and Palestine, Syria and Palestine, Jordan and Palestine, and Egypt and Palestine. None of these borders changed from before the 1948 war. There were no borders mentioned for Israel.

One of the aims of dumbass arab agitpropbullshitters is to make other innocent dumbass sheeple believe that, the 1949 armistice agreements specified the borders and that said agreements were not signed with Israel. Facts are:

1. armistice agreements do not set borders, - they set cease-fire lines.
2. The Israeli-Egyptian armistice agreement was signed in Rhodes on February 24, 1949.
3. The Lebanese-Israeli General Armistice Agreement was signed at Rosh Hanikra (Ras En Naqura) on March 23, 1949.
4. The Israeli-Jordanian armistice agreement was signed in Rhodes on April 3, 1949.
5. The Israel-Syrian armistice agreement was signed at the Hill 132 near Mahanayim on July 20, 1949.

In the 1979 peace agreement between Israel and Egypt it said that Israel was to withdraw behind the Egypt/Palestine border. Look it up.

Dumbass arab agitpropbullshitters want to make other innocent dumbass sheeple believe it is so, while the original text states "The permanent boundary between Egypt and Israel in the recognized international boundary between Egypt and the former mandated territory of Palestine, ..." Palestine is no mo, folks, forget it, get a life and a job.

I have asked many times for someone to find any documentation showing Israel acquiring borders and, to date, nobody has found any.

It is not a mullah-approved reading, of course.

 

[Marc39]

The 1949 armistice agreements specified the borders. They were: Lebanon and Palestine, Syria and Palestine, Jordan and Palestine, and Egypt and Palestine. None of these borders changed from before the 1948 war. There were no borders mentioned for Israel.

Non-binding. You're way out of your depth.

The only relevant binding, enforceable document is the Palestine Mandate establishing Palestine as the Jewish homeland/state from the Jordan River to the Med. Sea.

Now, even you know

 

[Marc39]

I have asked many times for someone to find any documentation showing Israel acquiring borders and, to date, nobody has found any.

You're mentally ill as you have been instructed that the League of Nations established coordinates for borders of Israel, from the Jordan River to the Med. Sea.

Maybe, one of your attendants can make a note of it.

 

[georgephillip]

Do you have a link for those "established coordinates?"

Of course, not.

You're hasbara...

Right?

 

[georgephillip]

"Dan Murphy
The Christian Science Monitor
November 14, 2006

"UN Alliance of Civilizations - THE REPORT

"CAIRO – A UN-sponsored group called the Alliance of Civilizations, created last year to find ways to bridge the growing divide between Muslim and Western societies, released a first report Monday that says the conflict over Israel and the Palestinian territories is the central driver in global tensions.

"'Our emphasis on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not meant to imply that it is the overt cause of all tensions between Muslim and Western societies,' write the report's authors, a group of academics and present and former government officials from 19 different countries.

"'Nevertheless, it is our view that the Israeli-Palestinian issue has taken on a symbolic value that colors cross cultural and political relations ... well beyond its limited geographic scope.'"

No Clash...No clash of civilizations, says UN report

 

[Marc39]

"Dan Murphy
The Christian Science Monitor
November 14, 2006

"UN Alliance of Civilizations - THE REPORT

"CAIRO – A UN-sponsored group called the Alliance of Civilizations, created last year to find ways to bridge the growing divide between Muslim and Western societies, released a first report Monday that says the conflict over Israel and the Palestinian territories is the central driver in global tensions.

"'Our emphasis on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not meant to imply that it is the overt cause of all tensions between Muslim and Western societies,' write the report's authors, a group of academics and present and former government officials from 19 different countries.

"'Nevertheless, it is our view that the Israeli-Palestinian issue has taken on a symbolic value that colors cross cultural and political relations ... well beyond its limited geographic scope.'"

No Clash...No clash of civilizations, says UN report

Alexis de Toqueville...

I studied the Koran a great deal. I came away from that study with the conviction there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad. So far as I can see, it is the principal cause of the decadence so visible today in the Muslim world and, though less absurd than the polytheism of old, its social and political tendencies are in my opinion to be feared, and I therefore regard it as a form of decadence rather than a form of progress in relation to paganism itself.

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Democracy-America-Complete-Alexis-Toqueville/dp/1406822701/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1288191338&sr=8-1]Amazon.com: Democracy In America (Complete) (9781406822700): Alexis de Toqueville: Books[/ame]

 

[Marc39]

Do you have a link for those "established coordinates?"

Of course, not.

You're hasbara...

Right?

Read the Palestine Mandate. Oh, that's right, you're a high school dropout.

 

[Marc39]

It is not an opinion at all. It is fact. If you look at the actual, legal borders you will find that Israel sits inside Palestine's borders.

Someone tell this mental defective Palestine doesn't exist. Poor bastard is humiliating himself.

The Palestine entity, formally established and defined by Britain, was formaly abolished in 1948 with the termination of the Mandate.
Middle East historian Bernard Lewis

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Islam-History-People-Events-Middle/dp/0812695186/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1288144935&sr=8-1]Amazon.com: Islam in History: Ideas, People, and Events in the Middle East (9780812695182): Bernard Lewis: Books: Reviews, Prices & more[/ame]

 

[georgephillip]

Do you have a link for those "established coordinates?"

Of course, not.

You're hasbara...

Right?

Read the Palestine Mandate. Oh, that's right, you're a high school dropout.

Reveal where the words "established coordinates" appear in the Palestine Mandate.

 

[Marc39]

Do you have a link for those "established coordinates?"

Of course, not.

You're hasbara...

Right?

Read the Palestine Mandate. Oh, that's right, you're a high school dropout.

Reveal where the words "established coordinates" appear in the Palestine Mandate.

I only help my own children with their homework, stupid little boy. Show some self-motivation and do your own homework or ask your mommy or daddy to do your homework.

Your utter ignorance of the subject matter is the reason I demolish you.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Read the Palestine Mandate. Oh, that's right, you're a high school dropout.

Reveal where the words "established coordinates" appear in the Palestine Mandate.

I only help my own children with their homework, stupid little boy. Show some self-motivation and do your own homework or ask your mommy or daddy to do your homework.

Your utter ignorance of the subject matter is the reason I demolish you.

"Established coordinates" do not appear in the Palestine Mandate.

Marc is the one who needs to do his homework.