BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 101,000
- 36,169
- 2,250
Nope. You think fox should be required to air Muslim prayer services if they pay for the time?If he pays the going rate for the ad time, you betcha. No doubt, you don't think so.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope. You think fox should be required to air Muslim prayer services if they pay for the time?If he pays the going rate for the ad time, you betcha. No doubt, you don't think so.
You don't think it's the same thing? Of course you don't.How pray tell, did anyone do anything to Bud Light. Are you trying to tell people how they have to spend their money now?
Well they are not really people so.....Speech is already highly restricted now; this isn't even new news. Banana republics do this as a matter of routine. Democrats will have no problem with it. They will get rid of any opposition via any method; they have no principles.
![]()
The RESTRICT Act would restrict a lot more than TikTok
Even if you believe that governments should be in the business of banning things such as popular communications tools, the details of the effort to ejectreason.com
Meet the Restrict Act, which is gaining momentum in both parties.
Any time you hear the word "Bipartisan support", be very scared.
How does 20 years in prison sound for violating speech that the government deems "bad"?
There seems to be more and more to censor every year.
Things to censor include negative talk about vaccines, the Climate agenda and the gender crap.
More to come I'm sure.
Run along comrade, you have no free will.You don't think it's the same thing? Of course you don't.
Have you got a problem with it? They show church shows on Sunday, why would I have a problem with Muslims---or Buddhists----or Hindi. Take a hike.Nope. You think fox should be required to air Muslim prayer services if they pay for the time?