The Collapse of Kamala Harris

It's an RCP map ?????

Are you that stupid ?

Dude, do finally get your folly. Real Clear Politics recognizes that there are 8 toss up states and over 100 toss EC votes.

But you won't look at any RCP map that shows any toss-up states. ...so you can pretend none exist.

You know you're full of shit. If you genuinely believed your own nonsense, you could acknowledge the existence of toss-up states that your OWN SOURCE confirms exists.

But you ignore them all.
 
I can't help that you're ignoring RCP recognizing 8 toss up states with over 100 EC votes.

You're demonstrating that you don't believe your own argument.....but refusing to look at any RCP map that shows toss up states, so you can play pretend that there are none.

Even you don't believe you.

Here's the RCP electoral map. No play pretending that there are no toss-ups necessary

View attachment 1028234

Every time you ignore it, you only prove me right.
Hahahaha

You are legend in your own mind.

Show me where I ever denied the existence of this map ?
 
This is an RCP map.

I don't recall being consulted about it's creation.

1729322044645.webp
 
Hahahaha

You are legend in your own mind.

Show me where I ever denied the existence of this map ?

The only maps you've ever cited showed ZERO toss-up states. Despite the fact that RCP, your own source, recognizes there are 8 such states with over 100 EC votes that are still a toss-up.

You clearly know your argument is bullshit.

Because you refused to look at anything beyond a map that showed NO toss-ups states, so you could play-pretend that none existed.

Here's the ACTUAL RCP map, with the ACTUAL aggregate polling, including the toss up states that you tried to pretend didn't exist.

1729322140458.webp



No play-pretend necessary. No ignoring RCP and their acknowledgement of 8 toss-up states and over 100 EC votes.

No self soothing with maps that remove any toss-ups that RCP is very clear ACTUALLY EXIST. But you have to pretend don't.

You know you're full of shit.
 
The only maps you've ever cited showed ZERO toss-up states. Despite the fact that RCP, your own source, recognizes there are 8 such states with over 100 EC votes that are still a toss-up.

You clearly know your argument is bullshit.

Because you refused to look at anything beyond a map that showed NO toss-ups states, so you could play-pretend that none existed.

Here's the ACTUAL RCP map, with the ACTUAL aggregate polling, including the toss up states that you tried to pretend didn't exist.

View attachment 1028238


No play-pretend necessary. No ignoring RCP and their acknowledgement of 8 toss-up states and over 100 EC votes.

No self soothing with maps that remove any toss-ups that RCP is very clear ACTUALLY EXIST. But you have to pretend don't.

You know you're full of shit.
I can't help that you don't like what RCP has created.
 
This is an RCP map.

I don't recall being consulted about it's creation.

View attachment 1028237

That is the RCP map that omits ANY toss ups. Its the one you self soothe on, so you can pretend that there are no toss up states.

RCP recognizes 8 toss-up states and over 100 EC votes that are too close to call.
So you ignore RCP, and refuse to look at any map that includes ANY toss-ups.

Its your tell. You know you're of shit. If you genuinely believed your bullshit, you wouldn't have to play-pretend that there are no toss up states. And this is the map you'd be looking at.

1729322338063.png
 
That is the RCP map that omits ANY toss ups. Its the one you self soothe on, so you can pretend that there are no toss up states.

It's RCP that put up the map that shows what things would look like with no toss ups.

Can you please stop lying ?
 
Its your tell. You know you're of shit.
You have not yet posted where I denied the existence of other RCP maps.

I guess you need to lie in order to sound sane.

I can't help you there.
 
It's RCP that put up the map that shows what things would look like with no toss ups.

My point exactly. The only map you'll look at is the map that doesn't show any toss up states, so you can pretend there are no toss up states.

But there are 8 toss up states an over 100 EC Votes that are too close to call. Says who? Says RCP, your own source.

This is your tell. If you genuinely believed that Harris was collapsing, you wouldn't have to play pretend that there are no toss-up states. You'd have the courage to look at them, acknowledge them, analyze them. Instead, you play pretend that there are no toss-ups.

Alas, there are.

1729322622497.webp



Even you don't believe your bullshit.
 
My point exactly. The only map you'll look at is the map that doesn't show any toss up states, so you can pretend there are no toss up states.
Uh, where did I say I didn't look at any other map ?

You keep making these claims you can't back up.

It's an RCP map that I cited.

You'll get over it.
 
Uh, where did I say I didn't look at any other map ?

You keep making these claims you can't back up.

It's an RCP map that I cited.

You'll get over it.
Your refusal to cite any map that ever showed a single toss-up state.

Its your tell, man. You acknowledgement that you know you're full of shit. You have to present maps that don't show what the RCP -your own source- acknowledges absolutely exists:

8 toss up states with over 100 EC votes that are still too close to call.


If you genuinely believed that Harris was crashing, you wouldn't need to play-pretend that there were no toss-up states.

Even you don't believe you.
 
Nope. It wasn't even a 'soft' coup. There was nothing illegal, no one lost any power, no roles were changed in government, the goverrnment still stands. It didn't even involve the government. Everything in question happened within a private organization: the DNC and who would be its nominee.

As for the '14 million votes cast', in every election candidates drop out and their delegates vote for someone else. Haley released her delegates so they could vote for Trump.

If Biden voters were 'disenfranchised', then so was every Haley voter. And every Cruz voter in 2016. And every voter for every candidate that ever dropped out.

If that's what y'all actually believe, why have only started the panty shitting now?
You know why.
 
There is no collapse.


Of course not. Its a dead lock. 215 to 219 with a 104 votes in the middle.

I have no idea who is going to win. Neither do they. Neither does Nate Silver, 538, or RCP.

But MAGA like to play pretend. So they only cite maps that omit all toss-up states and pretend there are none. Or they cite gambling websites, where you can literally buy better 'polling' for your preferred candidate.

They avoid the actual maps, showing the actual aggregate polling and the 8 toss up states like they were on fire.
 
Of course not. Its a dead lock. 215 to 219 with a 104 votes in the middle.

I have no idea who is going to win. Neither do they. Neither does Nate Silver, 538, or RCP.

But they like to play pretend. So they only cite maps that omit all toss-up states and pretend there are none. Or they cite gambling websites, where you can literally buy better 'polling' for your preferred candidate.

They avoid the actual maps, showing the actual aggregate polling and the 8 toss up states like they were on fire.
Yeah, they only use polls that confirm what they believe.
 
Your refusal to cite any map that ever showed a single toss-up state.

Its your tell, man. You acknowledgement that you know you're full of shit. You have to present maps that don't show what the RCP -your own source- acknowledges absolutely exists:

8 toss up states with over 100 EC votes that are still too close to call.


If you genuinely believed that Harris was crashing, you wouldn't need to play-pretend that there were no toss-up states.

Even you don't believe you.
Still making stuff up.

It must be tough to have no friends. There is a reason for that.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom