The collapse of Germany's solar and wind industry!!

[Skull Pilot]

all y'all have, is nothing but fallacy. we need to upgrade our grid to better implement any energy strategy.

We need to add modularity and redundancy and the best way to do that is to implement the use of small 4th gen nuclear reactors

sure; why not. it will balance our energy portfolio until fusion (an energy with a future) comes online.

Why Don't We Have Fusion Power?

So why do we have fission power, but not fusion power? The answer is pretty simple, and very frustrating to a lot of physicists out there:

We had a Manhattan Project for fission. We need a Manhattan Project for fusion (an energy with a future).

It really is that simple.

You didn't read the article did you?

 

[danielpalos]

all y'all have, is nothing but fallacy. we need to upgrade our grid to better implement any energy strategy.

We need to add modularity and redundancy and the best way to do that is to implement the use of small 4th gen nuclear reactors

sure; why not. it will balance our energy portfolio until fusion (an energy with a future) comes online.

Why Don't We Have Fusion Power?

So why do we have fission power, but not fusion power? The answer is pretty simple, and very frustrating to a lot of physicists out there:

We had a Manhattan Project for fission. We need a Manhattan Project for fusion (an energy with a future).

It really is that simple.

You didn't read the article did you?

My answer is better. And, we would have fusion by now, if we had.

 

[Skull Pilot]

We need to add modularity and redundancy and the best way to do that is to implement the use of small 4th gen nuclear reactors

sure; why not. it will balance our energy portfolio until fusion (an energy with a future) comes online.

Why Don't We Have Fusion Power?

So why do we have fission power, but not fusion power? The answer is pretty simple, and very frustrating to a lot of physicists out there:

We had a Manhattan Project for fission. We need a Manhattan Project for fusion (an energy with a future).

It really is that simple.

You didn't read the article did you?

My answer is better. And, we would have fusion by now, if we had.

Wrong again

 

[danielpalos]

sure; why not. it will balance our energy portfolio until fusion (an energy with a future) comes online.

Why Don't We Have Fusion Power?

So why do we have fission power, but not fusion power? The answer is pretty simple, and very frustrating to a lot of physicists out there:

We had a Manhattan Project for fission. We need a Manhattan Project for fusion (an energy with a future).

It really is that simple.

You didn't read the article did you?

My answer is better. And, we would have fusion by now, if we had.

Wrong again

we have fission Only due to the Socialism of a Manhattan Project. We can do the same with fusion (an energy with a future).

 

[elektra]

wind is always blowing, somewhere. a more efficient grid can connect energy sources much easier.

Yes, I hear the wind blowing from you mouth, it is called hot air. It is pure nonsense to not create power where we need it. The loses of transmitting power are astronomical and have much to do with the rising power rates across the country. Power is best produced locally, where it is use. Not traded on the stock market as a commodity.

 

[Billy_Bob]

all y'all have, is nothing but fallacy. we need to upgrade our grid to better implement any energy strategy.

We need to add modularity and redundancy and the best way to do that is to implement the use of small 4th gen nuclear reactors

This is best practice for energy usage, redundancy, failure reduction, and defense against an EMP attack or solar flare. Not to mention CO2 reduction as a side plus.

All those windmills and solar panels do is become a conduit for EMP and total grid destruction from an EMP.

 

[Billy_Bob]

all y'all have, is nothing but fallacy. we need to upgrade our grid to better implement any energy strategy.

We need to add modularity and redundancy and the best way to do that is to implement the use of small 4th gen nuclear reactors

sure; why not. it will balance our energy portfolio until fusion (an energy with a future) comes online.

Why Don't We Have Fusion Power?

So why do we have fission power, but not fusion power? The answer is pretty simple, and very frustrating to a lot of physicists out there:

We had a Manhattan Project for fission. We need a Manhattan Project for fusion (an energy with a future).

It really is that simple.

You didn't read the article did you?

HE doesn't read. He only parrots what his masters tell him..

 

[danielpalos]

wind is always blowing, somewhere. a more efficient grid can connect energy sources much easier.

Yes, I hear the wind blowing from you mouth, it is called hot air. It is pure nonsense to not create power where we need it. The loses of transmitting power are astronomical and have much to do with the rising power rates across the country. Power is best produced locally, where it is use. Not traded on the stock market as a commodity.

You probably still don't get it; an upgraded grid can help make renewables more cost effective along with balancing our energy portfolio. Stability is essential to efficient markets. An upgraded grid can be upgraded with more capacitance.

Basically, this infrastructure improvement will help us have more energy more readily available in a more cost effective manner, for the private sector to "plug and play".

 

[danielpalos]

I make a motion to place more electrical energy underground.

 

[danielpalos]

We need to add modularity and redundancy and the best way to do that is to implement the use of small 4th gen nuclear reactors

sure; why not. it will balance our energy portfolio until fusion (an energy with a future) comes online.

Why Don't We Have Fusion Power?

So why do we have fission power, but not fusion power? The answer is pretty simple, and very frustrating to a lot of physicists out there:

We had a Manhattan Project for fission. We need a Manhattan Project for fusion (an energy with a future).

It really is that simple.

You didn't read the article did you?

HE doesn't read. He only parrots what his masters tell him..

projecting much? it is a "technical" journal not a political journal.

 

[danielpalos]

underground "conduits to markets" could be made with sufficient space for increased capacitance as well.

 

[elektra]

You probably still don't get it; an upgraded grid can help make renewables more cost effective along with balancing our energy portfolio. Stability is essential to efficient markets. An upgraded grid can be upgraded with more capacitance.

Basically, this infrastructure improvement will help us have more energy more readily available in a more cost effective manner, for the private sector to "plug and play".

I get it, you want to spend my money on something that makes others rich. You want to force people to do what you think. It is called Marxism.

 

[Billy_Bob]

For example, you are a troll, obviously you have no facts to add here or there, so you troll. Your next response typically will be to demand facts of me or others, and then reply, "no its not".

So, you can't support your claim as usual.

Do you know how to calculate the resistance of cabling? Resistance causes power consumption/loss. Another idiot that has no clue how electricity works.

a better grid, could place major transmission lines underground and insulated.

WE already do this in the US.. And the loss is greater..

Underground, insulated energy transmission lines have a greater loss than aerial transmission lines?

You have no clue why there is greater loss... Priceless...

 

[Billy_Bob]

sure; why not. it will balance our energy portfolio until fusion (an energy with a future) comes online.

Why Don't We Have Fusion Power?

So why do we have fission power, but not fusion power? The answer is pretty simple, and very frustrating to a lot of physicists out there:

We had a Manhattan Project for fission. We need a Manhattan Project for fusion (an energy with a future).

It really is that simple.

You didn't read the article did you?

HE doesn't read. He only parrots what his masters tell him..

projecting much? it is a "technical" journal not a political journal.

Nope.. Its a political Journal posing as a science journal..

 

[Skull Pilot]

Why Don't We Have Fusion Power?

So why do we have fission power, but not fusion power? The answer is pretty simple, and very frustrating to a lot of physicists out there:

We had a Manhattan Project for fission. We need a Manhattan Project for fusion (an energy with a future).

It really is that simple.

You didn't read the article did you?

My answer is better. And, we would have fusion by now, if we had.

Wrong again

we have fission Only due to the Socialism of a Manhattan Project. We can do the same with fusion (an energy with a future).

you don't seem to understand that fusion on a large enough sale takes more power to implement than we can actually produce

 

[Skull Pilot]

wind is always blowing, somewhere. a more efficient grid can connect energy sources much easier.

Yes, I hear the wind blowing from you mouth, it is called hot air. It is pure nonsense to not create power where we need it. The loses of transmitting power are astronomical and have much to do with the rising power rates across the country. Power is best produced locally, where it is use. Not traded on the stock market as a commodity.

You probably still don't get it; an upgraded grid can help make renewables more cost effective along with balancing our energy portfolio. Stability is essential to efficient markets. An upgraded grid can be upgraded with more capacitance.

Basically, this infrastructure improvement will help us have more energy more readily available in a more cost effective manner, for the private sector to "plug and play".

stability is provided by a power generating source that produces 24/7/365 and that is not wind or solar

 

[danielpalos]

You probably still don't get it; an upgraded grid can help make renewables more cost effective along with balancing our energy portfolio. Stability is essential to efficient markets. An upgraded grid can be upgraded with more capacitance.

Basically, this infrastructure improvement will help us have more energy more readily available in a more cost effective manner, for the private sector to "plug and play".

I get it, you want to spend my money on something that makes others rich. You want to force people to do what you think. It is called Marxism.

you probably believe in, "trickle down".

 

[elektra]

you probably believe in, "trickle down".

I don't post what I believe, I post what I know. You on the other hand, have posted nothing but what you believe.

I get it, you are troll, I get it, there is no way to support Wind Mills and Solar Panels, all you or anyone else can do is either link to the government source that says it works, or make little quips, that it works.

 

[danielpalos]

So, you can't support your claim as usual.

Do you know how to calculate the resistance of cabling? Resistance causes power consumption/loss. Another idiot that has no clue how electricity works.

a better grid, could place major transmission lines underground and insulated.

WE already do this in the US.. And the loss is greater..

Underground, insulated energy transmission lines have a greater loss than aerial transmission lines?

You have no clue why there is greater loss... Priceless...

there isn't; it is simply more expensive, right now to place cables underground. improvements in infrastructure are costly, but must be considered "worth it" to any first world economy.

 

[danielpalos]

you probably believe in, "trickle down".

I don't post what I believe, I post what I know. You on the other hand, have posted nothing but what you believe.

I get it, you are troll, I get it, there is no way to support Wind Mills and Solar Panels, all you or anyone else can do is either link to the government source that says it works, or make little quips, that it works.

Basically, this infrastructure improvement will help us have more energy more readily available in a more cost effective manner, for the private sector to "plug and play".

reducing costs for the private sector is what Government should be doing.