Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 136,395
- 28,256
- 2,180
How many people can Earth sustain?
...
More than we need to worry about.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many people can Earth sustain?
...
I don’t take you seriously.You also are unable to explain a map of the Arctic....
He's nuttier than 20 pounds of squirrel shit in a 10-pound bag.
Why not is because I though you were finished lying and would just go away.found a photo of a landmark sinking yet?
WHY NOT?
LMFAO!!!!
Why not is because I though you were finished lying and would just go away.
![]()
The Colosseum: World's Sinking Cities and Crumbling Sites
All over the world, many of our beloved cities and landmarks are sinking at alarming rates. From rising sea levels to crumbling foundations, some of the world's wonders may not be here for our descendants to enjoy.abcnews.go.com
The sinking thing was your theory. You decide on whether you support it or not and then I'll try to provide contrary evidence. I'm not fussy on which side of the debate you allow me to take.BUST 'em up...
Venice is not sinking. The Co2 fraud has said it would be underwater soon. Actually, the OPPOSITE is happening - LOL!!!
Venice canals dry - Google Search
www.google.com
London, Matterhorn, Mexico City, Coliseum, all laughable land based non sinking entities
Bora Bora actually is sinking. Your fraud piece has one thing that actually is sinking. The question is WHY. Ocean rise? NO.
View attachment 810878
![]()
Like the Marshalls, the Solomons, and others in South Pacific, Bora Bora is sinking because it is approaching PROF and will not just be underwater in a few million years, it will be UNDER THE EARTH's CRUST.
Nice try.
Keep parroting bullshit.
It will always get outed as bullshit if The Doctor is IN
Most morons here schooled by The Doctor resort to these types of cowardly drive byes....
I don't take you seriously, bro.You cannot explain a map of the Arctic, because you are a science invalid moron. You only take fudged fraud "seriously" and then are unable to defend it.
The sinking thing was your theory. You decide on whether you support it or not and then I'll try to provide contrary evidence. I'm not fussy on which side of the debate you allow me to take.
Whatever you decide, there's no way it's going to satisfy your dogmatic position and rage over being taken down for lying.
Can you explain a map of the Arctic yet???
LOL!!!
This is typical. Just how pathetic is it? $20 trillion dollars spent and the Co2 fraud cannot explain a map of the Arctic....