The CIA is working to arm Kurdish forces with the aim of sparking a popular uprising in Iran

[Crepitus]

What choice do they have? Either cooperation with us (the West), with some perspective of independence, or they risk complete annihilation, total cultural erasure, and suppression by imperialistic actors in the so‑called Global South. As i wrote before , If it were only up to us, we would have given them Kurdistan many, many years ago. The so‑called Global South doesn’t think there is anything wrong with imperialism and colonialism as long as they are the ones on top — of course...

Post in thread '🇷🇺Decolonization of Eastern and Central Europe ! PICTURES, VIDEOS, Texts. #Lenin down !'

Jun 10, 2025

Helsinki Commission Hearing on Moscow's Imperial Ambitions​

​

• Litwin

We'll just abandon them to die.

Again.

 

[Failzero]

We'll just abandon them to die.

Again.

If the Turks attack them ( Again) perhaps

 

[Lockback]

How many times has the cia screwed over the kurds. This is pathetic. JFK should have smashed the cia when he had the chance insteading of waiting.

He didn't have time.
They killed him.

 

[Lockback]

We'll just abandon them to die.

Again.

Oh, like you care.

 

[Litwin]

We'll just abandon them to die.

Again.

maybe, still, What choice do Kurds have? The Global South imperialists just HATE THEM , without us around Kurds will be exterminated, much like the Armenians- Circassians - Crimean Tatars, etc.

 

[eagle7-31]

as I wrote before, If it were only up to us, we would have given them Kurdistan many, many years ago. The so‑called Global South doesn’t think there is anything wrong with imperialism and colonialism as long as they are the ones on top — of course...

View attachment 1226856
Helsinki Commission Hearing on Moscow's Imperial Ambitions:


• Kaliningrad — Königsberg;
• Orenburg — Orinbor;
• Volgograd — Sarysu;
• Grozny — Solzha-Gala; and others.

What is the problem with the Kurds and Turkey. I am aware there is bad history, not sure why.

 

[MarathonMike]

The biggest problem here that the Iranian shia empire might collapse together with the mullah‑politburo. But, the majority of Persians want to preserve the Iranian empire . The Persian lands are the best part of Iran, but imperialistic Persians (Much like ALL Muscovites from Solzhenitsyn, Navalny to Dugin and putin) want the Iranian empire intact — and even expanded. I don’t think that’s possible. Persians will lose at least some of their colonies, such as Kurdistan and Baluchistan. So what do you think — can Persians accept losing some of their colonies?
View attachment 1226433

Looks like the CIA's efforts are working well. Let's hope this is the "boots on the ground" that is desperately needed.

 

[Crepitus]

Oh, like you care.

Always have, I worked with a bunch of them back in the mid 90s. As a group they are the most "can do" group in the middle east. They do not say "insha'allah" and **** off trusting "god" to get it done. They put their backs into it and work.

 

[Mack The Finger]

Watch Pluto TV Military: Live TV Channel for Free | Pluto TV

March along with Pluto TV Military for documentaries, series and movies on the weaponry and technology behind humanity's biggest conflicts. This is the channel for all those who have served, and everyone who honors them. Watch Pluto TV Military live for free.

pluto.tv

 

[Litwin]

Looks like the CIA's efforts are working well. Let's hope this is the "boots on the ground" that is desperately needed.

we will see. I am not 100% sure

 

[Litwin]

What is the problem with the Kurds and Turkey. I am aware there is bad history, not sure why.

Global South imperial powers (Including, Moscow , Turkish, Syrian, Iranian empires) just hate their colonial subjects — Tuva, Kurdistan, Chechnya, Sakha, Kalmykia, Eastern Belarus (Smałensk, Bransk, Pskou, Staradub), Kashmir, Eastern Turkestan, Tibet, and others. Without outside support, the Kurds and many other colonized peoples could face the risk of destruction, much like what happened to Armenians- Circassians - Crimean Tatars, etc.

 

[Litwin]

Always have, I worked with a bunch of them back in the mid 90s. As a group they are the most "can do" group in the middle east. They do not say "insha'allah" and **** off trusting "god" to get it done. They put their backs into it and work.

 

[Litwin]

 

[MarathonMike]

we will see. I am not 100% sure

There is no certainty in war, but the Kurds mobilizing a ground offensive so early in the conflict is a good sign imo.

 

[Litwin]

There is no certainty in war, but the Kurds mobilizing a ground offensive so early in the conflict is a good sign imo.

 

[Failzero]

If the Brits could do it in the late 1940s and early 1950s then the Kurds jump starting a little seems palatable

 

[Litwin]

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I agree with her.

‘Leave the Kurds alone. We are not guns for hire’ says Iraqi First Lady

"Too often, the Kurds are remembered only when their strength or sacrifice is needed," said Iraqi First Lady Shanaz Ibrahim Ahmed.

thenewregion.com

 

[Litwin]

I agree with her.

‘Leave the Kurds alone. We are not guns for hire’ says Iraqi First Lady

"Too often, the Kurds are remembered only when their strength or sacrifice is needed," said Iraqi First Lady Shanaz Ibrahim Ahmed.

thenewregion.com

is she an Arab ?

2017 Kurdistan Region independence referendum - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Litwin]

If the Brits could do it in the late 1940s and early 1950s then the Kurds jump starting a little seems palatable

What did the Brits do in the late 1940s and early 1950s? Did they change one man for another? Here we are dealing with Bolshevism (a violent semi‑totalitarian regime). We’d need to bring down the entire Bolshevism in order to create another geopolitical reality. And the Brits in the 40s–50s still had massive balls — do the US have massive balls today?