The Challenges for US-India Relations After Obama

Vikrant

Gold Member
Apr 20, 2013
8,320
1,075
245
The U.S.
The challenge will become real challenging if Hillary becomes the next torch bearer.

---

The arrow is pointing up in the U.S.-India relationship. Whereas ties between the world’s oldest democracy and the world’s biggest democracy had long been long characterized by mutual suspicion, optimism is now the dominant theme.

Indeed, in an era of American political polarization, support for the U.S.-India relationship is among the few policy issues on which Democrats and Republicans are united. Support for the bilateral relationship is strong in New Delhi as well. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s June 2016 speech to a joint meeting of the U.S. Congress was, as Indian-American journalist Tunku Varadarajan put it, the “clearest Indian promise to date of a 21st-century alliance with the U.S.” The George W. Bush administration, in negotiating the civil nuclear deal, opened the door to greater U.S.-India cooperation on a variety of issues. Yet it was President Barack Obama who seized upon the opportunity presented by the election of Modi to propel the relationship forward and make the ties between the U.S. and India truly strategic.

In a few short years, the Obama administration has achieved much with its counterparts in India. The United States named India a “major defense partner” and Prime Minister Modi welcomed a strong American presence in the Indo-Pacific region. On energy, Obama and Modi revived a long-stalled deal for the United States to build nuclear reactors in India, not to mention announcing a series of joint green initiatives. And on trade, Modi ratified the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement.

...

The Challenges for US-India Relations After Obama
 
US India "relations" are no different than US China relations, where money and jobs went when they left our country. How about just US relations for a change. We have no jobs, no money, and Syrians being flown in to take what little we have left. And kill us if they feel like it.
Relations with China didn't create jobs for us. Nothing about it was a good deal for us. The US can't take care of our own, but we can build reactors, and walls, and borders for everyone else even if we DO have to borrow the money to do it from China? Bullshit.
You are a real moron to buy into the global garbage you are being fed. You probably think pouring billions into climate change actually has something to do with climate.
 
US India "relations" are no different than US China relations, where money and jobs went when they left our country. How about just US relations for a change. We have no jobs, no money, and Syrians being flown in to take what little we have left. And kill us if they feel like it.
Relations with China didn't create jobs for us. Nothing about it was a good deal for us. The US can't take care of our own, but we can build reactors, and walls, and borders for everyone else even if we DO have to borrow the money to do it from China? Bullshit.
You are a real moron to buy into the global garbage you are being fed. You probably think pouring billions into climate change actually has something to do with climate.

You are wandering all over. Let me help you get on the guided path.

a. Indians buy a lot of US goods and services that create jobs in the US.
b. This topic has nothing to do with Syrian refugees.
c. US charges money when it builds reactors in other countries. This creates high paying jobs in the US.
d. Tackling climate change is a shared responsibility between all nations. US is not expected to foot the bill alone unless it chooses to dictate the terms of climate change measures.

You are right about one thing ... China - US economic relations did not work in the favor of US.
 

Forum List

Back
Top