I do but I don't think the founding fathers meant to include nuclear arms in the 2nd.
So you get to pick and choose what parts of the Constitution are legally binding?
Wow! So if a SCOTUS disagrees with you they are either uneducated, dishonest, or both?
Seems to me that if they could agree and the definition of 'arms' they would have included it. They choose not to.Man, you really should have read that article before posting a link to it. Because it defeated your own argument
Words have meaning. Pretending like the founders meant “muskets” when they wrote “arms” in a legally binding document is so disingenuous and unethical.
You know what it says. I know what it says. It’s time the left grew up and dropped the act.
What traditional marriage do you mean? Polygamy, 13-year-old brides, wives that could not inherit or own property?
Most Americans support gay marriage so it is now an American tradition.
If I bought one in Pakistan you'd be OK with me importing it?
Hypocrite! Where is your indignation over Soros's campaign donations? Gates? Bezos? Zuckerberg? Yeah, those are actual people that are part of that 1% in your partisan cartoon. LMAO. Democrats.
I said what I said--They were DEMOCRATS. Why are you being so evasive in admitting it.
If you were capable, you can find plans for one in any library and have been able to for at least 40 years.
You really have a problem with your attempts to spin reality in your inept attempts to justify your degenerate point of view. Tsk tsk tsk. Sucks to be you.
I never said any different but you seem to have trouble accepting that was only one part of them and not even the most important part.
I'm fine accepting reality, it is you who have only a distant, fleeting relationship with it.
You have avoided that admission in every post while trying to make republicans out to be boogey men. You are very transparent.
I didn't claim that "traditional" marriage included polygamy and 13 year old wives. Naw, you don't attempt to spin reality. You wouldn't do that, would you? BULLSHIT.
Oh, I get it, only your traditions are real traditions. Other people's traditions are perversions, even if they were the norms in different times and different places.
I didn't dispute the Democrats/Dixiecrats historically being the party of slavery and never mentioned Republicans whereas you avoided admitting the Dixiecrats were also White, Conservative, Southern, and Christian.
When you show that the majority of traditional marriages are polygamy, or child brides, or degenerate homosexuals or transconfused then they will become traditional. They are fringe at best and never even scratch the surface of mainstream. Many people practice the tradition of drinking their own urine for health reasons--would you consider this traditional?
Because it is irrelevant to the discussion in the OP. Are you trying to claim that there are no white, southern, Christian progressives? Keep digging that hole or try to remember the subject of the OP.
Polygamy was a tradition of Mormons for a time. I'd say same-sex marriage is now a traditional value in the US.
And it was specifically outlawed in the US. Again, a fringe of the overall population EVER practiced it.
And you would be wrong. Less than 1/2 of 1% of all marriages in the US are between same sex couples. Yup, another fringe. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...ne-percent-of-all-married-couples-in-the-u-s/
So are Democrats progressives or conservatives? Is slavery a tradition you want to preserve or bring back? Hint
Please show me where I intimated that I supported slavery. Quite the contrary, throughout this thread I have shown you that slavery was the exclusive policy of DEMOCRATS. All progressives are DEMOCRATS. No progressives are conservatives. You embrace progressives AND democrats, so I would be more inclined to believe that you support slavery by extension. This should clear things up for you but I'm not holding out much hope.
