The Candy Crowley Tipping Point

clevergirl

Gold Member
Oct 22, 2009
2,721
554
153
Her bias was so obvious and pervasive during the debate making it a sham- that she very well may have helped Romney more then her unethical interference helped Obama.

She got it wrong.

She interfered.

She took a side.

Candy Crowley may finally have done something else as well: so visibly tipping the scales of media bias that the end result makes Mitt Romney the next president.

The American Spectator : The Candy Crowley Tipping Point
 
I knew that fastass piece of shit would cheat for Obamination from start to finish.

Also, the questions were perfectly chosen for him to roll out his bullshit rambling responses of nothingness.
 
Candy was probably lured to the White House for a prep talk with cookies and pies, then bought off with pizza.
 
Candy Crowley did better than any moderator to date.
 
Her bias was so obvious and pervasive during the debate making it a sham- that she very well may have helped Romney more then her unethical interference helped Obama.

She got it wrong.

She interfered.

She took a side.

Candy Crowley may finally have done something else as well: so visibly tipping the scales of media bias that the end result makes Mitt Romney the next president.

The American Spectator : The Candy Crowley Tipping Point

Talk about poor losers and you end up talking about Righties.
 
Only Pub dupes can be so dumb and obtuse.
Romney said Obama didn't call it an "act of terror" for 14 days. As Crowley said, Obama said "no act of terror would stop us the next day. Don't be obtuse, brainwashed chumps.

As soon as they knew abouts the RPGs, it was an act of terror. A week later, the CIA concluded there was no protest, and it was terrorists.. The only lies are from RW bomb throwers.
 
Crowley could have only hurt Romney wiith people who aren't paying attention anyway. Personally I don't think that many would have been watching the debate. Informed folks already knew the score and Maobama was lying his ass off. I'll bet Maobama will do his best to avoid the subject of his incompentence next time out, and he ain't gonna get away with it. His chickens gonna come home to roost.
 
Her bias was so obvious and pervasive during the debate making it a sham- that she very well may have helped Romney more then her unethical interference helped Obama.

She got it wrong.

She interfered.

She took a side.

Candy Crowley may finally have done something else as well: so visibly tipping the scales of media bias that the end result makes Mitt Romney the next president.

The American Spectator : The Candy Crowley Tipping Point

It was a clear win for Obama. Mitt lost it, he broke the first rule of debating, keep a cool head. He was attempting to run over the president and when that failed, he started in on the moderator. He's a bully but it didn't work this time.

Mittens lost, it hurts, huh?
 
candysweddingday.jpg
 
Only the losers whine about the umpires.

Romney hardly lost... Especially when you look at the first debate.

That you and your ignorant ilk don't have a problem with what she did is a major reason that our politics have become so partisan. The OMG (Obama Media Groupies) have damaged our elections...your willingness to give that a pass is a sad reality check on that fact.
 
Only Pub dupes can be so dumb and obtuse.
Romney said Obama didn't call it an "act of terror" for 14 days. As Crowley said, Obama said "no act of terror" would stop us the next day. Don't be obtuse, brainwashed chumps.

As soon as they knew abouts the RPGs, it was an act of terror. A week later, the CIA concluded there was no protest, and it was terrorists.. The only lies are from RW bomb throwers. And silly dupes...end of story, change the channel.
 
Last edited:
Her bias was so obvious and pervasive during the debate making it a sham- that she very well may have helped Romney more then her unethical interference helped Obama.

She got it wrong.

She interfered.

She took a side.

Candy Crowley may finally have done something else as well: so visibly tipping the scales of media bias that the end result makes Mitt Romney the next president.

The American Spectator : The Candy Crowley Tipping Point

It was a clear win for Obama. Mitt lost it, he broke the first rule of debating, keep a cool head. He was attempting to run over the president and when that failed, he started in on the moderator. He's a bully but it didn't work this time.

Mittens lost, it hurts, huh?


No one thinks Mitt lost, only that Obama improved from his abysmal first performance...but I digress, this thread is about the unethical behavior of the moderator.
 
Her bias was so obvious and pervasive during the debate making it a sham- that she very well may have helped Romney more then her unethical interference helped Obama.



The American Spectator : The Candy Crowley Tipping Point

It was a clear win for Obama. Mitt lost it, he broke the first rule of debating, keep a cool head. He was attempting to run over the president and when that failed, he started in on the moderator. He's a bully but it didn't work this time.

Mittens lost, it hurts, huh?


No one thinks Mitt lost, only that Obama improved from his abysmal first performance...but I digress, this thread is about the unethical behavior of the moderator.

Crowley was correct to call Romney on his fibs

About time don't ya think?

My favorite part...

Romney thinking he had the President on his claim

Obama cooly looking up and saying.....Proceed Governor

What a spanking
 
Last edited:
Only Pub dupes can be so dumb and obtuse.
Romney said Obama didn't call it an "act of terror" for 14 days. As Crowley said, Obama said "no act of terror would stop us the next day. Don't be obtuse, brainwashed chumps.

As soon as they knew abouts the RPGs, it was an act of terror. A week later, the CIA concluded there was no protest, and it was terrorists.. The only lies are from RW bomb throwers.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6aXewSM0M4]WH Asked, Given Facts, Why Has Obama Admin Told Public Repeatedly Libya Was Spontaneous Attack? - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oOxAyU8QwM]Rice: Libya attacks spontaneous - YouTube[/ame]
 
Her bias was so obvious and pervasive during the debate making it a sham- that she very well may have helped Romney more then her unethical interference helped Obama.

She got it wrong.

She interfered.

She took a side.

Candy Crowley may finally have done something else as well: so visibly tipping the scales of media bias that the end result makes Mitt Romney the next president.

The American Spectator : The Candy Crowley Tipping Point
For acting like an honest moderator. :lol:
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top