The Bolton Bombshell (from his book)

[colfax_m]

That's a lie.

prove it was more. name a witness.

Name a witness that what? Stop babbling and pretend like you have a college education.

wasn't related to the call.

Laura Cooper.

or not. dude, you're flailing horribly

Laura Cooper testifies that Ukraine knew of stalled aid far earlier than White House claims – video

Laura Cooper wasn't on the phone call and had no knowledge of the phone call.

I'm not the one that's flailing.

 

[protectionist]

Omg you have evidence of bribery!?

solicitation, with a quid pro quo for personal gain.... government corruption, corrupt use of govt power or position..... still looking for the Statute number,

but found those other two in my search!

There is nothing "for personal gain"

He’s trying to steal the election.

That's what Democrats are doing.

How?

All their scams. Kavanaugh, Russia collusion, Ukraine, + their usual election cheating (illegal aliens, vote miscounting, attacking Trump supporters, debate cheating, etc etc

 

[Claudette]

Chaos defines the first three years of the Trump Administration, it has now infected the members of the Trump's Lawyers, from Rudy to the current crop of lawyers now putting all watchers to sleep.

In wake of Bolton book news, White House allies say Trump lawyers bungled defense


Reports that John Bolton has written a firsthand account of the president’s direct involvement in withholding aid to Ukraine has left some Republicans confused and angry over the legal strategy by the president’s defense team — which has devoted much of its arguments in the Senate impeachment trial to arguing that no such firsthand evidence existed.

One Republican operative who advises the White House said he was “flabbergasted at how stupidly they have handled this.”

Trump attorney Mike Purpura argued Saturday that “not a single witness testified that the president himself said that there was any connection between any investigations and security assistance, a presidential meeting or anything else.”

Well for chaos he's done a damned find job.

UE is the lowest its been in 50 years, there are jobs all across the country and the economy is doing great. Hell those that play the stock market are doing fine as well.

I'll take that chaos all day every day. LOL

What evidence will you provide to prove anything trump has done to benefit the middle class, working class who live pay check to pay check and the very poor who work two or more part time jobs at minimum wage with no benefits?

I'll answer for you. Nothing. trump brags about the economy, based solely on the Stock Market, and only when it is growing. Have you noticed it too is chaotic?

You sure are funny. There will always be poor people in every country. Its up to them to better themselves. Bleeding hearts like you sure can't do it.

As for your chaos?? You apparently don't like UE the lowest its been in 50 years or jobs everywhere in this country. And you sure don't like a great economy or a great stock market.

Maybe you should move the Venezuela and live the socialist dream where all are equal.

Have a great day you dumbass.

 

[colfax_m]

They weren't mounting a defense of Trump. They were mounting an attack on Biden.

I see you do support corruption when it's YOUR team.

Not supporting anything of the sort. The testimony from heard was more than enough to disprove the allegations against Biden.

huh? dude, too fking special.

You didn't know that?

know what?

Testimony before the House exonerated Biden. You didn't know that?

 

[jc456]

Yes they did. Yet they got a blanket response.

When did they take that subpoena to court to have it enforced?

It is just a figment of your pathetically screwed imagination.

The asked them to appear, the only subpoena that was issued was taken to court and the commies withdrew it.

.

That's not true. Article 2 of the impeachment says this:
(1) Directing the White House to defy a lawful subpoena by withholding the production of documents sought therein by the Committees.

(2) Directing other Executive Branch agencies and offices to defy lawful subpoenas and withhold the production of documents and records from the Committees — in response to which the Department of State, Office of Management and Budget, Department of Energy, and Department of Defense refused to produce a single document or record.

(3) Directing current and former Executive Branch officials not to cooperate with the Committees — in response to which nine Administration officials defied subpoenas for testimony, namely John Michael “Mick” Mulvaney, Robert B. Blair, John A. Eisenberg, Michael Ellis, Preston Wells Griffith, Russell T. Vought, Michael Duffey, Brian McCormack, and T. Ulrich Brechbuhl.

the DOJ said it wasn't lawful. until you get such credentials, shut up.

You don't get to tell anyone when to shut up.

I can say it if I want to. shut up!!!

 

[jc456]

I see you do support corruption when it's YOUR team.

Not supporting anything of the sort. The testimony from heard was more than enough to disprove the allegations against Biden.

huh? dude, too fking special.

You didn't know that?

know what?

Testimony before the House exonerated Biden. You didn't know that?

no it didn't, it was dropped. no exoneration. no vote taken. just dropped. you should have listened to the lawyer. you know, took your fat fking fingers out of your ears, type a thing.

 

[jc456]

solicitation, with a quid pro quo for personal gain.... government corruption, corrupt use of govt power or position..... still looking for the Statute number,

but found those other two in my search!

There is nothing "for personal gain"

He’s trying to steal the election.

That's what Democrats are doing.

How?

All their scams. Kavanaugh, Russia collusion, Ukraine, + their usual election cheating (illegal aliens, vote miscounting, attacking Trump supporters, debate cheating, etc etc

oh the orangemanbad mantra!!!

 

[colfax_m]

solicitation, with a quid pro quo for personal gain.... government corruption, corrupt use of govt power or position..... still looking for the Statute number,

but found those other two in my search!

There is nothing "for personal gain"

He’s trying to steal the election.

That's what Democrats are doing.

How?

All their scams. Kavanaugh, Russia collusion, Ukraine, + their usual election cheating (illegal aliens, vote miscounting, attacking Trump supporters, debate cheating, etc etc

Ukraine isn't a scam. It's oversight.

 

[task0778]

The question is, were the subpoenas lawful, in that they were not issued by means of a vote by the full House to conduct an inquiry/investigation? AND, would the president's invocation of executive privilege be struck down by the court if they decided the subpoenas were in fact lawful? Those are questions that the democrats should have challenged, but didn't for purely political reasons. Which to me can only mean the Article for obstruction of Congress is bullshit.

 

[jc456]

There is nothing "for personal gain"

He’s trying to steal the election.

That's what Democrats are doing.

How?

All their scams. Kavanaugh, Russia collusion, Ukraine, + their usual election cheating (illegal aliens, vote miscounting, attacking Trump supporters, debate cheating, etc etc

Ukraine isn't a scam. It's oversight.

it's foreign policy actually and the president owns that. know the law or shut up!

 

[colfax_m]

Not supporting anything of the sort. The testimony from heard was more than enough to disprove the allegations against Biden.

huh? dude, too fking special.

You didn't know that?

know what?

Testimony before the House exonerated Biden. You didn't know that?

no it didn't, it was dropped. no exoneration. no vote taken. just dropped. you should have listened to the lawyer. you know, took your fat fking fingers out of your ears, type a thing.

I'm going to start being more impolite with you unless you tone it back.

The testimony before the House completely destroyed the allegations against Biden. Read George Kent's testimony. It's all there.

READ: Testimony Of Deputy Assistant Secretary Of State George Kent

 

[colfax_m]

He’s trying to steal the election.

That's what Democrats are doing.

How?

All their scams. Kavanaugh, Russia collusion, Ukraine, + their usual election cheating (illegal aliens, vote miscounting, attacking Trump supporters, debate cheating, etc etc

Ukraine isn't a scam. It's oversight.

it's foreign policy actually and the president owns that. know the law or shut up!

Congress oversees the executive including foreign policy. Don't be an idiot.

 

[OKTexas]

You don't know what he is going to say, do you?

You are just wishing on a falling star.

Then you agree to have Bolton testify. He will put it all to rest.

Nope, let the commies dance with the witnesses they brought to the dance, after all they have an irrefutable case, right?

.

Scared, aren’t you.

Nope, Trump will be acquitted regardless, the commies just want to sling more mud. It's a waste of time.

.

Since when is getting to the truth a waste of time?

The commies said they had a slam dunk case, what happened to that? The truth is the bidens are dirty as hell, you folks don't seem to interested in learning the facts about that.

.

 

[Dick Foster]

Chaos defines the first three years of the Trump Administration, it has now infected the members of the Trump's Lawyers, from Rudy to the current crop of lawyers now putting all watchers to sleep.

In wake of Bolton book news, White House allies say Trump lawyers bungled defense


Reports that John Bolton has written a firsthand account of the president’s direct involvement in withholding aid to Ukraine has left some Republicans confused and angry over the legal strategy by the president’s defense team — which has devoted much of its arguments in the Senate impeachment trial to arguing that no such firsthand evidence existed.

One Republican operative who advises the White House said he was “flabbergasted at how stupidly they have handled this.”

Trump attorney Mike Purpura argued Saturday that “not a single witness testified that the president himself said that there was any connection between any investigations and security assistance, a presidential meeting or anything else.”

Well for chaos he's done a damned find job.

UE is the lowest its been in 50 years, there are jobs all across the country and the economy is doing great. Hell those that play the stock market are doing fine as well.

I'll take that chaos all day every day. LOL

What evidence will you provide to prove anything trump has done to benefit the middle class, working class who live pay check to pay check and the very poor who work two or more part time jobs at minimum wage with no benefits?

I'll answer for you. Nothing. trump brags about the economy, based solely on the Stock Market, and only when it is growing. Have you noticed it too is chaotic?

Trump doesn't need to do anything you hopeless dummy, it shows up in their paycheck giving them all the proof they need. Remember it's not about you bunch of assholes, it's about all of America. And always remember this, elections are really about the economy, dumbass.

 

[colfax_m]

When did they take that subpoena to court to have it enforced?

It is just a figment of your pathetically screwed imagination.

The asked them to appear, the only subpoena that was issued was taken to court and the commies withdrew it.

.

That's not true. Article 2 of the impeachment says this:
(1) Directing the White House to defy a lawful subpoena by withholding the production of documents sought therein by the Committees.

(2) Directing other Executive Branch agencies and offices to defy lawful subpoenas and withhold the production of documents and records from the Committees — in response to which the Department of State, Office of Management and Budget, Department of Energy, and Department of Defense refused to produce a single document or record.

(3) Directing current and former Executive Branch officials not to cooperate with the Committees — in response to which nine Administration officials defied subpoenas for testimony, namely John Michael “Mick” Mulvaney, Robert B. Blair, John A. Eisenberg, Michael Ellis, Preston Wells Griffith, Russell T. Vought, Michael Duffey, Brian McCormack, and T. Ulrich Brechbuhl.

the DOJ said it wasn't lawful. until you get such credentials, shut up.

You don't get to tell anyone when to shut up.

I can say it if I want to. shut up!!!

 

[colfax_m]

Then you agree to have Bolton testify. He will put it all to rest.

Nope, let the commies dance with the witnesses they brought to the dance, after all they have an irrefutable case, right?

.

Scared, aren’t you.

Nope, Trump will be acquitted regardless, the commies just want to sling more mud. It's a waste of time.

.

Since when is getting to the truth a waste of time?

The commies said they had a slam dunk case, what happened to that? The truth is the bidens are dirty as hell, you folks don't seem to interested in learning the facts about that.

.

There was more than enough testimony in front of the House to indict Trump. Republicans have a higher standard of proof than normal people so we really are going to have to slap them in the face with it.

There was more than enough testimony before the House to tell us that Biden wasn't doing anything wrong. You don't seem interested in acknowledging that.

 

[jc456]

That's what Democrats are doing.

How?

All their scams. Kavanaugh, Russia collusion, Ukraine, + their usual election cheating (illegal aliens, vote miscounting, attacking Trump supporters, debate cheating, etc etc

Ukraine isn't a scam. It's oversight.

it's foreign policy actually and the president owns that. know the law or shut up!

Congress oversees the executive including foreign policy. Don't be an idiot.

nope, post anything that says that. the president has sole ownership of foreign policy.

fk dude, yet again,

Foreign policy of the United States - Wikipedia

Powers of the President[edit]
The President sets the tone for all foreign policy. The State Department and all members design and implement all details to the President's policy. The Congress approves the President's picks for ambassadors and as a secondary function, can declare war. The President of the United States negotiates treaties with foreign nations, then treaties enter into force only if ratified by two-thirds of the Senate. The President is also Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces, and as such has broad authority over the armed forces. Both the Secretary of State and ambassadors are appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate. The United States Secretary of State acts similarly to a foreign minister and under the President's leadership, is the primary conductor of state-to-state diplomacy.

 

[jc456]

That's what Democrats are doing.

How?

All their scams. Kavanaugh, Russia collusion, Ukraine, + their usual election cheating (illegal aliens, vote miscounting, attacking Trump supporters, debate cheating, etc etc

Ukraine isn't a scam. It's oversight.

it's foreign policy actually and the president owns that. know the law or shut up!

Congress oversees the executive including foreign policy. Don't be an idiot.

read what I just posted in the other post of yours.

 

[colfax_m]

How?

All their scams. Kavanaugh, Russia collusion, Ukraine, + their usual election cheating (illegal aliens, vote miscounting, attacking Trump supporters, debate cheating, etc etc

Ukraine isn't a scam. It's oversight.

it's foreign policy actually and the president owns that. know the law or shut up!

Congress oversees the executive including foreign policy. Don't be an idiot.

nope, post anything that says that. the president has sole ownership of foreign policy.

fk dude, yet again,

Foreign policy of the United States - Wikipedia

Powers of the President[edit]
The President sets the tone for all foreign policy. The State Department and all members design and implement all details to the President's policy. The Congress approves the President's picks for ambassadors and as a secondary function, can declare war. The President of the United States negotiates treaties with foreign nations, then treaties enter into force only if ratified by two-thirds of the Senate. The President is also Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces, and as such has broad authority over the armed forces. Both the Secretary of State and ambassadors are appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate. The United States Secretary of State acts similarly to a foreign minister and under the President's leadership, is the primary conductor of state-to-state diplomacy.

This is the stupidest argument you've put forth yet. Where does that say he isn't subject to oversight?

 

[jc456]

All their scams. Kavanaugh, Russia collusion, Ukraine, + their usual election cheating (illegal aliens, vote miscounting, attacking Trump supporters, debate cheating, etc etc

Ukraine isn't a scam. It's oversight.

it's foreign policy actually and the president owns that. know the law or shut up!

Congress oversees the executive including foreign policy. Don't be an idiot.

nope, post anything that says that. the president has sole ownership of foreign policy.

fk dude, yet again,

Foreign policy of the United States - Wikipedia

Powers of the President[edit]
The President sets the tone for all foreign policy. The State Department and all members design and implement all details to the President's policy. The Congress approves the President's picks for ambassadors and as a secondary function, can declare war. The President of the United States negotiates treaties with foreign nations, then treaties enter into force only if ratified by two-thirds of the Senate. The President is also Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces, and as such has broad authority over the armed forces. Both the Secretary of State and ambassadors are appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate. The United States Secretary of State acts similarly to a foreign minister and under the President's leadership, is the primary conductor of state-to-state diplomacy.

This is the stupidest argument you've put forth yet. Where does that say he isn't subject to oversight?

he can't go to war, that's all.