fncceo
Diamond Member
- Nov 29, 2016
- 45,094
- 38,771
- 3,615
Not for its entire lifetime. You mean, for its lifetime so far.In fact, for 99.95% of the lifetime of our sun .
You haven't heard? I have some bad news for you then ...

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not for its entire lifetime. You mean, for its lifetime so far.In fact, for 99.95% of the lifetime of our sun .
Vapid whining is no substitute for actual argument.I suggest you take a science class sometime. Your understanding is very inadequate.
False. The image of the CMB map is,indeed, a picture of the first electromagnetic radiation of our universe, released during the decoupling event, itself brought on by and part of the rapid expansion of the early universe. I.E., the Big Bang.We don't know that. We suspect, but we don't know. There is no picture of it.
It's a fact. It's simply the name given to the process of the formation of life. The hypotheses of how it occured are hypotheses.Yes, abiogenesis is an informed guess.
Vapid whining is no substitute for actual argument.I suggest you take a science class sometime. Your understanding is very inadequate.
False. The image of the CMB map is,indeed, a picture of the first electromagnetic radiation of our universe, released during the decoupling event, itself brought on by and part of the rapid expansion of the early universe. I.E., the Big Bang.We don't know that. We suspect, but we don't know. There is no picture of it.
The earth and the sun formed at the same time. Like I said, its formation wasn't complete, but it existed in proto form.What? Everything in our solar system came from other stars that went super nova. When our sun was born the earth wasn’t here yet.Hmmm, no, the Earth and the Sun are the same age. The universe is about 13 billion years old.Well, it took nearly 4.5 billion years for our light bulb of sentience to wink on. That's about half the life of our star.If this is true then why not believe every point of light has people as smart as us circling them?Incorrect, you can measure the wobble of stars the exoplanets orbit.
they are assuming those are planets, and they might be but we dont know for sure
Liquid water.If there is water. Water seems to be the one necessary ingredient.There will be life on Mars, but it will take experimentation. Life does not need the conditions on Earth, the purpose for adaptation is for life to thrive in various places, as it does on Earth from 1000 degree sulfur based hydrothermal vents to cold mountaintopsIf we could plant life on mars we would. Not humans but dna or simple single cell organismsYou can't live on Mars or too long because they have no molten core and therefore no magnetic field and therefore no protection from solar radiation.You have everything backwards. If humans move to Mars they will evolve to Mars and then the earth will be strange
Wake up we can go anywhere and be anything
Or if we could somehow create an ozone and plant oxygen or protein or fungus or anything that might take hold we would for sure.
I think there is water in mars.
Wrong, as all the structures we see have a finite age.If you believe dust will write classical music given enough time, you’d have to believe all of them have life.
If you believe dust will write classical music given enough time, you’d have to believe all of them have life.
All the elements in the universe are the same age, stars are not elementsSo everything on earth and every other planet moon asteroids and comets are older than our star because we all came from stars that went super nova long before our sun was born.Everything in the universe is exactly the same age as matter can not be created thus it always wasHmmm, no, the Earth and the Sun are the same age. The universe is about 13 billion years old.Well, it took nearly 4.5 billion years for our light bulb of sentience to wink on. That's about half the life of our star.If this is true then why not believe every point of light has people as smart as us circling them?
The Sun predates the Earth by at least a million years.
Imagine the amount of time all that star stuff would have taken to get to us too.
If you believe dust will write classical music given enough time, you’d have to believe all of them have life.This, according to some estimate, give or take quite a few zeroes I'm sure. A deeper philosophical question which goes beyond theology, though it certainly entangles it.
So, this number again, 1000000000000000000000 planets! According to The Institute of Astronomy at University of Cambridge. How many solar systems are there? | Institute of Astronomy
Putting the exact estimation aside. We would have to take a massive leap of faith to think that not only is there NOT other life in the universe, but, also of such existences, that there aren't many far more advanced than us.
Imagine a planet the size of Jupiter, 100's of billions of citizens. Imagine them not having our reptilian instincts of rage and violence, or developing weapons of war to be used against each other. Consider if they had the average brain power 250x that of our smartest humans, and existed for much longer, maybe lived on average 10000 years.
What would be the end result? Is there any religion that makes any consideration for this possibility (outside, I think Scientology)? It really is a daunting concept. We could be the most advanced by far, we might be Gods great creation. It would hardly seem we could be alone though based on the odds and even plain randomness.
So the star stuff that was floating around when our sun formed came from previous generations of stars 4.5 billion years ago.I would love to see the proof of that,,,"A million years?" The Sun and the Earth are 4.5 billion years old. A million years is virtually an instant when measured against that. The Earth took a while to take it's final form, but that process began at the same time the Sun formed.Hmmm, no, the Earth and the Sun are the same age. The universe is about 13 billion years old.
The Sun predates the Earth by at least a million years.
The Sun formed first, the planetary disc came later. How long it took for the disc to form planets is still open to conjecture.
The Sun had to form first for our current theory of planetary formation to work.
Sunlight was another ingredient needed for life, until hydrothermal vents were discovered. Water is needed for our type of life, no reason to assume all is like usIf there is water. Water seems to be the one necessary ingredient.There will be life on Mars, but it will take experimentation. Life does not need the conditions on Earth, the purpose for adaptation is for life to thrive in various places, as it does on Earth from 1000 degree sulfur based hydrothermal vents to cold mountaintopsIf we could plant life on mars we would. Not humans but dna or simple single cell organismsYou can't live on Mars or too long because they have no molten core and therefore no magnetic field and therefore no protection from solar radiation.You have everything backwards. If humans move to Mars they will evolve to Mars and then the earth will be strange
Wake up we can go anywhere and be anything
Or if we could somehow create an ozone and plant oxygen or protein or fungus or anything that might take hold we would for sure.
I think there is water in mars.
Wrong. The hydrogen atoms are as old as the universe. The other atoms are a lot younger.Everything in the universe is exactly the same age
Demonstrably not true ...
![]()
Again the elements composing those two people are exactly the same age
That is when the universe became "transparent", so to speak. As the universe expanded, it reached a point where hydrogen atoms could form (recombination). These atoms emitted photons, as their electrons tried to find lower energy states. This collection of hydrogen atoms, unlike its progenitor plasma state, was transparent to photons. So the photons could escape and then travel over distance. They reach us as radio waves, and we deem them the CMB.Vapid whining is no substitute for actual argument.I suggest you take a science class sometime. Your understanding is very inadequate.
False. The image of the CMB map is,indeed, a picture of the first electromagnetic radiation of our universe, released during the decoupling event, itself brought on by and part of the rapid expansion of the early universe. I.E., the Big Bang.We don't know that. We suspect, but we don't know. There is no picture of it.
Please tell me more about the decoupling after the Big Bang. I'm very interested.
That is when the universe became "transparent", so to speak. As the universe expanded, it reached a point where hydrogen atoms could form (recombination). These atoms emitted photons, as their electrons tried to find lower energy states. This collection of hydrogen atoms, unlike its progenitor plasma state, was transparent to photons. So the photons could escape and then travel over distance. They reach us as radio waves, and we deem them the CMB.Vapid whining is no substitute for actual argument.I suggest you take a science class sometime. Your understanding is very inadequate.
False. The image of the CMB map is,indeed, a picture of the first electromagnetic radiation of our universe, released during the decoupling event, itself brought on by and part of the rapid expansion of the early universe. I.E., the Big Bang.We don't know that. We suspect, but we don't know. There is no picture of it.
Please tell me more about the decoupling after the Big Bang. I'm very interested.
Whiny nonsense. You can still point at anything being described here and say, "god did it!".They're "anything but God" apologists
Still it’s pretty amazing the universe itself created the earth and us. We were all forged in stars. You are related to the rocks.No one has any idea what the universe is much less where it came from. This is why all the math that would explain what is observed in the universe fails as the math is not itself wrong but can not be applied to unknownsWrong. The proposition that everything needs a creator is a logical contradiction. If God doesn't require a creator, then neither does the universe. Your failure to answer the question I asked shows that even you know that.That is not answerable from out current perspective, at the very least God must be defined before such a question can be ask. A better question is what created us, and I assure you that no sterile pond created the most sophisticated code in the universe our DNA. And do not babble that RNA created itself either because the mathematical probability of that is nullWho created God?Except when geniuses declare that the universe created itself from nothing because nothing got bored one day and decided to turn nothing into the universeA basic principle of science is that the same laws exist everywhere. It would be nonsensical if they didn't.
Creationism is absurd.