The Big Lie About Trump's Candidacy

[jwoodie]

Everyone seem to be in a panic regarding the unrelenting attacks on Trump from both political parties. Given this deluge of propaganda, many people are now thinking that his candidacy is a lost cause.

REMEMBER THIS: These attacks are being made by insincere people who fear a loss of power and influence if he is elected. Further, they are playing a disingenuous game of comparing his positions with some unspecified policies rather than the real alternatives voters will be facing in November. FOR EXAMPLE:

1. IMMIGRATION. Trump favor closing our borders to undocumented persons.

WHAT DO HILLARY/OTHERS FAVOR?

2. TRADE AGREEMENTS: Trump favors aggressive trade bargaining with other countries.

WHAT DO HILLARY/OTHERS FAVOR?

3. MILITARY EXPENDITURES: Trump favors making our allies pay their fair share.

WHAT DO HILLARY/OTHERS FAVOR?

4. TAX POLICY: Trump favors lower taxes to bring money back to the U.S. and create jobs here.

WHAT DO HILLARY/OTHERS FAVOR?

What other SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES is Trump so wrong about, especially when compared to the other candidates? If/when he is nominated, the entire game will change overnight and Hillary/Bernie will no longer be able to hide in their protective media cocoons. THIS is why they can't stop talking about him.

 

[Pogo]

Usually we have to wait at least until post 2 for some Rumpbot to immediately change the subject to "Hillary".

This one comes with its own self-deflection gene in the OP. That's progress.

 

[jwoodie]

Usually we have to wait at least until post 2 for some Rumpbot to immediately change the subject to "Hillary".

This one comes with its own self-deflection gene in the OP. That's progress.

Speaking of deflection, I even numbered the issues for you. Do you ever deal in SUBSTANCE (of the legal variety)?

 

[Pogo]

Usually we have to wait at least until post 2 for some Rumpbot to immediately change the subject to "Hillary".

This one comes with its own self-deflection gene in the OP. That's progress.

Speaking of deflection, I even numbered the issues for you. Do you ever deal in SUBSTANCE (of the legal variety)?

Occasionally, if it's something I have expertise in. Most of what I do here seems to be pointing out logical fallacies. That keeps me plenty busy.

 

[jwoodie]

Occasionally, if it's something I have expertise in.

Interesting admission re lack of substance in your posts.

Most of what I do here seems to be pointing out logical fallacies.

How is "self-deflection" a "logical fallacy?" (your words)

That keeps me plenty busy.

Indication of limited intellectual capacity?