Zone1 The Big Bang Theory

[Hector12]

Did light exist at the beginning of the universe?​

By examining the speed and direction in which galaxies were moving, astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered the universe was expanding. This 1929 discovery suggested that the cosmos was once smaller, with scientists eventually calculating that the entire universe was concentrated into one, infinitely dense point about 13.8 billion years ago, until the Big Bang happened.

MSN

www.msn.com

The finite beginning of the universe implies an Infinite Beginner. The complexity of the universe suggests a Divine Intelligence.

 

[Crepitus]

Did light exist at the beginning of the universe?​

By examining the speed and direction in which galaxies were moving, astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered the universe was expanding. This 1929 discovery suggested that the cosmos was once smaller, with scientists eventually calculating that the entire universe was concentrated into one, infinitely dense point about 13.8 billion years ago, until the Big Bang happened.

MSN

www.msn.com

The finite beginning of the universe implies an Infinite Beginner. The complexity of the universe suggests a Divine Intelligence.

 

[Donald H]

Did light exist at the beginning of the universe?​

By examining the speed and direction in which galaxies were moving, astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered the universe was expanding. This 1929 discovery suggested that the cosmos was once smaller, with scientists eventually calculating that the entire universe was concentrated into one, infinitely dense point about 13.8 billion years ago, until the Big Bang happened.

MSN

www.msn.com

The finite beginning of the universe implies an Infinite Beginner. The complexity of the universe suggests a Divine Intelligence.

No, it doesn't. You've been saddled with bible nonsense and you can't unsubscribe without risk.. Science only can offer an answer on the presence of light.

You are forced to deal with questions such as the example of 'Jonah and the Big Fish.

You can willingly and publicly unsubscribe if you need to!

You can't deal with any questions on 'light' until you do.

Any Christian asking the question has to be quietly suggesting that he's starting to backpedal.

 

[longly]

No, it doesn't. You've been saddled with bible nonsense and you can't unsubscribe without risk.. Science only can offer an answer on the presence of light.

You are forced to deal with questions such as the example of 'Jonah and the Big Fish.

You can willingly and publicly unsubscribe if you need to!

You can't deal with any questions on 'light' until you do.

Any Christian asking the question has to be quietly suggesting that he's starting to backpedal.

I'm a Christian, and I believe in both God and science. Unlike some, I do not consider the Bible a science book or a history book—it's a book of faith. It provides insight into the thinking of people in the beginning and teaches us how to live, but it doesn't offer all the answers to the mysteries of the universe. God left that up to us to discover.

 

[Donald H]

I'm a Christian, and I believe in both God and science. Unlike some, I do not consider the Bible a science book or a history book—it's a book of faith. It provides insight into the thinking of people in the beginning and teaches us how to live, but it doesn't offer all the answers to the mysteries of the universe. God left that up to us to discover.

Right! Then you should know the answer to the question. You should be telling him that the god has already answered his question on light. Go ahead and prove it by quoting from your bible!

And you could tell him too that if he's asking for science's opinion then he has to be backsliding.

Because the bible god doesn't agree with scinece.

 

[longly]

Right! Then you should know the answer to the question. You should be telling him that the god has already answered his question on light. Go ahead and prove it by quoting from your bible!

And you could tell him too that if he's asking for science's opinion then he has to be backsliding.

Because the bible god doesn't agree with scinece.

No, you're comparing apples and Gallifreyans. The two aren't even in the same universe. There's a vast difference between God and science: God created the reality we know; science explains the reality we know. You cannot prove or disprove God. He exists outside our ability to conceive.

Let me offer a thought experiment in perception: Imagine living in a universe with only two directions—side to side and back to front. One day, you see a dot appear in your field of vision. It grows wider and wider, then begins to shrink—until it disappears. What would that mean to you?

This is why any attempt to explain God is, in my view, pointless. God exists—but beyond our ability to comprehend. That is my personal belief, and it can't be changed. I believe because I want to believe.

 

[Hector12]

No, it doesn't. You've been saddled with bible nonsense and you can't unsubscribe without risk.. Science only can offer an answer on the presence of light.

You are forced to deal with questions such as the example of 'Jonah and the Big Fish.

You can willingly and publicly unsubscribe if you need to!

You can't deal with any questions on 'light' until you do.

Any Christian asking the question has to be quietly suggesting that he's starting to backpedal.

I have read the Bible enough times to know that every word in it is true, and that those who don't think so are going to Hell.

...I do not really think that way, but you probably think I do.

 

[BreezeWood]

- with scientists eventually calculating that the entire universe was concentrated into one, infinitely dense point about 13.8 billion years ago

bb is cyclical - ever renewing.

what is the surroundings of the dense point - where all matter has been transformed to energy through compaction.

- as certain as the renewal would be the presence of lite.