Now you're just projecting. You must be really sad. I make arguments that you don't like - you follow me around yapping insults about what you mis-comprehend about my mind-state when I type words, on the internet. Get a fuckin life, is the best phrase for a shit-head like you. I dont mince words.You follow me like a yapping Dog, and you do it to other folks I see, as well. You're just gross, don't blame me ya fuckin' idiot.
Follow you? lol. Your conceit is mesmerising.
You say you are smart? What is smart about constant conflict and insults?
You're argument addicted.
The Bible contradiction thread
- Thread starter MedfordMan
- Start date
Mindful
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #262
Now you're just projecting. You must be really sad. I make arguments that you don't like - you follow me around yapping insults about what you mis-comprehend about my mind-state when I type words, on the internet. Get a fuckin life, is the best phrase for a shit-head like you. I dont mince words.You follow me like a yapping Dog, and you do it to other folks I see, as well. You're just gross, don't blame me ya fuckin' idiot.
Follow you? lol. Your conceit is mesmerising.
You say you are smart? What is smart about constant conflict and insults?
You're argument addicted.
Primitive nonentity.
Follow you around? lmao. We all know who does that sort of thing.
You're beating a dead horse with the metaphors thing because you're very bad at reading comprehension.No, I'm the guy you don't like it when he holds your feet to the fire. Your convoluted belief system isn't difficult to understand, your inconsistency is the point of contention and not whether or not something was a metaphorical teaching. You have a lot of trouble with conflating things, mr christ cracker mocker.
Let me make it simple for you.
in luke 19:27 in a parable Jesus says, "Now, as for those enemies of mine who did not want me to be their king, bring them here and slaughter them in my presence!". Some people could take that to mean that Jesus is instructing the faithful to slaughter Jews and you would prance along and say, murderous bastard! but thats just dumb.
Jews, for example, have been circumcising in actuality, not metaphorically but actually cutting the heads of their dicks off ...to PRACTICE the representation of a metaphor. It's not that the metaphor is hard to understand ....it's actually doing it that makes it just as woo-woo as the christ cracker. You are no better, pee-pee cutter. You believe in ridiculous bullshit like a god dictated 613 ridiculous laws to each represent a metaphorical teaching and hand-wash the fact that 1: the god is not in evidence to begin with, woo-woo believer, and 2: chattel slavery, stoning, rape and genocide didn't merely happen metaphorically - same as pee-pee cutting.
You hand wash some things as not actual, when others literally are - yet you mock the metaphorical practice of eating a cracker.
You are a hypocrite, and believe in fairy tales all the same.
Yes, it's you. So, go away - you never have anything intelligent to add.Now you're just projecting. You must be really sad. I make arguments that you don't like - you follow me around yapping insults about what you mis-comprehend about my mind-state when I type words, on the internet. Get a fuckin life, is the best phrase for a shit-head like you. I dont mince words.You follow me like a yapping Dog, and you do it to other folks I see, as well. You're just gross, don't blame me ya fuckin' idiot.
Follow you? lol. Your conceit is mesmerising.
You say you are smart? What is smart about constant conflict and insults?
You're argument addicted.
Primitive nonentity.
Follow you around? lmao. We all know who does that sort of thing.
"was jesus real?"
"can atheists be moral?"
You're just dopey.
You're beating a dead horse with the metaphors thing because you're very bad at reading comprehension.No, I'm the guy you don't like it when he holds your feet to the fire. Your convoluted belief system isn't difficult to understand, your inconsistency is the point of contention and not whether or not something was a metaphorical teaching. You have a lot of trouble with conflating things, mr christ cracker mocker.
Let me make it simple for you.
in luke 19:27 in a parable Jesus says, "Now, as for those enemies of mine who did not want me to be their king, bring them here and slaughter them in my presence!". Some people could take that to mean that Jesus is instructing the faithful to slaughter Jews and you would prance along and say, murderous bastard! but thats just dumb.
Jews, for example, have been circumcising in actuality, not metaphorically but actually cutting the heads of their dicks off ...to PRACTICE the representation of a metaphor. It's not that the metaphor is hard to understand or that the teaching represents a metaphor....it's actually doing it that makes it just as woo-woo as the christ cracker. You are no better, pee-pee cutter. You believe in ridiculous bullshit like a god dictated 613 ridiculous laws to each represent a metaphorical teaching and hand-wash the fact that 1: the god is not in evidence to begin with, woo-woo believer, and 2: chattel slavery, stoning, rape and genocide didn't merely happen metaphorically - same as pee-pee cutting.
You hand wash some things as not actual, when others literally are - yet you mock the metaphorical practice of eating a cracker.
You are a hypocrite, and believe in fairy tales all the same.
Thank you for helping me to prove the wisdom of God in giving the command to refrain from the flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate and providing the evidence for the disturbing death consequent for failing to comply by so generously displaying the bitter contents of your addled mind.
Mindful
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #266
Yes, it's you. So, go away - you never have anything intelligent to add.Now you're just projecting. You must be really sad. I make arguments that you don't like - you follow me around yapping insults about what you mis-comprehend about my mind-state when I type words, on the internet. Get a fuckin life, is the best phrase for a shit-head like you. I dont mince words.You follow me like a yapping Dog, and you do it to other folks I see, as well. You're just gross, don't blame me ya fuckin' idiot.
Follow you? lol. Your conceit is mesmerising.
You say you are smart? What is smart about constant conflict and insults?
You're argument addicted.
Primitive nonentity.
Follow you around? lmao. We all know who does that sort of thing.
"was jesus real?"
"can atheists be moral?"
You're just dopey.
Whatever turns you on.
You have the intellect of an amoeba.
Or are you a cultural marxist?
That's just a goofy assertion, and exacerbates the facts on the field that some guys got together - wrote some ethics they believed in and metaphorical ways to represent them...and then said they were from God, yeshua, blobby face, so that dopes like you who portend to be "deep thinkers" would actually believe them.You're beating a dead horse with the metaphors thing because you're very bad at reading comprehension.No, I'm the guy you don't like it when he holds your feet to the fire. Your convoluted belief system isn't difficult to understand, your inconsistency is the point of contention and not whether or not something was a metaphorical teaching. You have a lot of trouble with conflating things, mr christ cracker mocker.
Let me make it simple for you.
in luke 19:27 in a parable Jesus says, "Now, as for those enemies of mine who did not want me to be their king, bring them here and slaughter them in my presence!". Some people could take that to mean that Jesus is instructing the faithful to slaughter Jews and you would prance along and say, murderous bastard! but thats just dumb.
Jews, for example, have been circumcising in actuality, not metaphorically but actually cutting the heads of their dicks off ...to PRACTICE the representation of a metaphor. It's not that the metaphor is hard to understand or that the teaching represents a metaphor....it's actually doing it that makes it just as woo-woo as the christ cracker. You are no better, pee-pee cutter. You believe in ridiculous bullshit like a god dictated 613 ridiculous laws to each represent a metaphorical teaching and hand-wash the fact that 1: the god is not in evidence to begin with, woo-woo believer, and 2: chattel slavery, stoning, rape and genocide didn't merely happen metaphorically - same as pee-pee cutting.
You hand wash some things as not actual, when others literally are - yet you mock the metaphorical practice of eating a cracker.
You are a hypocrite, and believe in fairy tales all the same.
All you have succeeded in doing is proving the wisdom of God in giving the command to refrain from the flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate and providing the evidence for the disturbing death consequent for failing to comply by so generously displaying the bitter contents of your addled mind.
You got 1-2'd and don't even realize it, pee-pee cutter.
lol... I do not follow, belong to, or believe in any religion.That's just a goofy assertion, and exacerbates the facts on the field that some guys got together - wrote some ethics they believed in and metaphorical ways to represent them...and then said they were from God, yeshua, blobby face, so that dopes like you who portend to be "deep thinkers" would actually believe them.You're beating a dead horse with the metaphors thing because you're very bad at reading comprehension.No, I'm the guy you don't like it when he holds your feet to the fire. Your convoluted belief system isn't difficult to understand, your inconsistency is the point of contention and not whether or not something was a metaphorical teaching. You have a lot of trouble with conflating things, mr christ cracker mocker.
Let me make it simple for you.
in luke 19:27 in a parable Jesus says, "Now, as for those enemies of mine who did not want me to be their king, bring them here and slaughter them in my presence!". Some people could take that to mean that Jesus is instructing the faithful to slaughter Jews and you would prance along and say, murderous bastard! but thats just dumb.
Jews, for example, have been circumcising in actuality, not metaphorically but actually cutting the heads of their dicks off ...to PRACTICE the representation of a metaphor. It's not that the metaphor is hard to understand or that the teaching represents a metaphor....it's actually doing it that makes it just as woo-woo as the christ cracker. You are no better, pee-pee cutter. You believe in ridiculous bullshit like a god dictated 613 ridiculous laws to each represent a metaphorical teaching and hand-wash the fact that 1: the god is not in evidence to begin with, woo-woo believer, and 2: chattel slavery, stoning, rape and genocide didn't merely happen metaphorically - same as pee-pee cutting.
You hand wash some things as not actual, when others literally are - yet you mock the metaphorical practice of eating a cracker.
You are a hypocrite, and believe in fairy tales all the same.
All you have succeeded in doing is proving the wisdom of God in giving the command to refrain from the flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate and providing the evidence for the disturbing death consequent for failing to comply by so generously displaying the bitter contents of your addled mind.
You got 1-2'd and don't even realize it, pee-pee cutter.
You are a ******* idiot.
You believe a sky fairy talked to people because they said so. Youve said as much...sorry you dont like to be presented with the fact that its equally as ******* ridiculous as that which you mocklol... I do not follow, belong to, or believe in any religion.That's just a goofy assertion, and exacerbates the facts on the field that some guys got together - wrote some ethics they believed in and metaphorical ways to represent them...and then said they were from God, yeshua, blobby face, so that dopes like you who portend to be "deep thinkers" would actually believe them.You're beating a dead horse with the metaphors thing because you're very bad at reading comprehension.No, I'm the guy you don't like it when he holds your feet to the fire. Your convoluted belief system isn't difficult to understand, your inconsistency is the point of contention and not whether or not something was a metaphorical teaching. You have a lot of trouble with conflating things, mr christ cracker mocker.
Let me make it simple for you.
in luke 19:27 in a parable Jesus says, "Now, as for those enemies of mine who did not want me to be their king, bring them here and slaughter them in my presence!". Some people could take that to mean that Jesus is instructing the faithful to slaughter Jews and you would prance along and say, murderous bastard! but thats just dumb.
Jews, for example, have been circumcising in actuality, not metaphorically but actually cutting the heads of their dicks off ...to PRACTICE the representation of a metaphor. It's not that the metaphor is hard to understand or that the teaching represents a metaphor....it's actually doing it that makes it just as woo-woo as the christ cracker. You are no better, pee-pee cutter. You believe in ridiculous bullshit like a god dictated 613 ridiculous laws to each represent a metaphorical teaching and hand-wash the fact that 1: the god is not in evidence to begin with, woo-woo believer, and 2: chattel slavery, stoning, rape and genocide didn't merely happen metaphorically - same as pee-pee cutting.
You hand wash some things as not actual, when others literally are - yet you mock the metaphorical practice of eating a cracker.
You are a hypocrite, and believe in fairy tales all the same.
All you have succeeded in doing is proving the wisdom of God in giving the command to refrain from the flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate and providing the evidence for the disturbing death consequent for failing to comply by so generously displaying the bitter contents of your addled mind.
You got 1-2'd and don't even realize it, pee-pee cutter.
You are a ******* idiot.
^ You believe fairy tales are real, just like christ crackers.You're beating a dead horse with the metaphors thing because you're very bad at reading comprehension.No, I'm the guy you don't like it when he holds your feet to the fire. Your convoluted belief system isn't difficult to understand, your inconsistency is the point of contention and not whether or not something was a metaphorical teaching. You have a lot of trouble with conflating things, mr christ cracker mocker.
Let me make it simple for you.
in luke 19:27 in a parable Jesus says, "Now, as for those enemies of mine who did not want me to be their king, bring them here and slaughter them in my presence!". Some people could take that to mean that Jesus is instructing the faithful to slaughter Jews and you would prance along and say, murderous bastard! but thats just dumb.
Jews, for example, have been circumcising in actuality, not metaphorically but actually cutting the heads of their dicks off ...to PRACTICE the representation of a metaphor. It's not that the metaphor is hard to understand or that the teaching represents a metaphor....it's actually doing it that makes it just as woo-woo as the christ cracker. You are no better, pee-pee cutter. You believe in ridiculous bullshit like a god dictated 613 ridiculous laws to each represent a metaphorical teaching and hand-wash the fact that 1: the god is not in evidence to begin with, woo-woo believer, and 2: chattel slavery, stoning, rape and genocide didn't merely happen metaphorically - same as pee-pee cutting.
You hand wash some things as not actual, when others literally are - yet you mock the metaphorical practice of eating a cracker.
You are a hypocrite, and believe in fairy tales all the same.
God in giving the command
^ You believe fairy tales are real, just like christ crackers.You're beating a dead horse with the metaphors thing because you're very bad at reading comprehension.No, I'm the guy you don't like it when he holds your feet to the fire. Your convoluted belief system isn't difficult to understand, your inconsistency is the point of contention and not whether or not something was a metaphorical teaching. You have a lot of trouble with conflating things, mr christ cracker mocker.
Let me make it simple for you.
in luke 19:27 in a parable Jesus says, "Now, as for those enemies of mine who did not want me to be their king, bring them here and slaughter them in my presence!". Some people could take that to mean that Jesus is instructing the faithful to slaughter Jews and you would prance along and say, murderous bastard! but thats just dumb.
Jews, for example, have been circumcising in actuality, not metaphorically but actually cutting the heads of their dicks off ...to PRACTICE the representation of a metaphor. It's not that the metaphor is hard to understand or that the teaching represents a metaphor....it's actually doing it that makes it just as woo-woo as the christ cracker. You are no better, pee-pee cutter. You believe in ridiculous bullshit like a god dictated 613 ridiculous laws to each represent a metaphorical teaching and hand-wash the fact that 1: the god is not in evidence to begin with, woo-woo believer, and 2: chattel slavery, stoning, rape and genocide didn't merely happen metaphorically - same as pee-pee cutting.
You hand wash some things as not actual, when others literally are - yet you mock the metaphorical practice of eating a cracker.
You are a hypocrite, and believe in fairy tales all the same.
God in giving the command
every fairy tale is about something real dumbass.
You must have stayed on pleasure Island for too long and those donkey ears are there to stay. (pinnocchio 3:14)
That's nice, and all - but you believe a sky pixy gave commands and have said as much, while mocking folks who metaphorically eat a cracker. You're a hypocrite, of the first order - and engage in many a post-hoc fallacy.^ You believe fairy tales are real, just like christ crackers.You're beating a dead horse with the metaphors thing because you're very bad at reading comprehension.No, I'm the guy you don't like it when he holds your feet to the fire. Your convoluted belief system isn't difficult to understand, your inconsistency is the point of contention and not whether or not something was a metaphorical teaching. You have a lot of trouble with conflating things, mr christ cracker mocker.
Let me make it simple for you.
in luke 19:27 in a parable Jesus says, "Now, as for those enemies of mine who did not want me to be their king, bring them here and slaughter them in my presence!". Some people could take that to mean that Jesus is instructing the faithful to slaughter Jews and you would prance along and say, murderous bastard! but thats just dumb.
Jews, for example, have been circumcising in actuality, not metaphorically but actually cutting the heads of their dicks off ...to PRACTICE the representation of a metaphor. It's not that the metaphor is hard to understand or that the teaching represents a metaphor....it's actually doing it that makes it just as woo-woo as the christ cracker. You are no better, pee-pee cutter. You believe in ridiculous bullshit like a god dictated 613 ridiculous laws to each represent a metaphorical teaching and hand-wash the fact that 1: the god is not in evidence to begin with, woo-woo believer, and 2: chattel slavery, stoning, rape and genocide didn't merely happen metaphorically - same as pee-pee cutting.
You hand wash some things as not actual, when others literally are - yet you mock the metaphorical practice of eating a cracker.
You are a hypocrite, and believe in fairy tales all the same.
God in giving the command
every fairy tale is about something real dumbass.
Mindful
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #273
^ You believe fairy tales are real, just like christ crackers.You're beating a dead horse with the metaphors thing because you're very bad at reading comprehension.No, I'm the guy you don't like it when he holds your feet to the fire. Your convoluted belief system isn't difficult to understand, your inconsistency is the point of contention and not whether or not something was a metaphorical teaching. You have a lot of trouble with conflating things, mr christ cracker mocker.
Let me make it simple for you.
in luke 19:27 in a parable Jesus says, "Now, as for those enemies of mine who did not want me to be their king, bring them here and slaughter them in my presence!". Some people could take that to mean that Jesus is instructing the faithful to slaughter Jews and you would prance along and say, murderous bastard! but thats just dumb.
Jews, for example, have been circumcising in actuality, not metaphorically but actually cutting the heads of their dicks off ...to PRACTICE the representation of a metaphor. It's not that the metaphor is hard to understand or that the teaching represents a metaphor....it's actually doing it that makes it just as woo-woo as the christ cracker. You are no better, pee-pee cutter. You believe in ridiculous bullshit like a god dictated 613 ridiculous laws to each represent a metaphorical teaching and hand-wash the fact that 1: the god is not in evidence to begin with, woo-woo believer, and 2: chattel slavery, stoning, rape and genocide didn't merely happen metaphorically - same as pee-pee cutting.
You hand wash some things as not actual, when others literally are - yet you mock the metaphorical practice of eating a cracker.
You are a hypocrite, and believe in fairy tales all the same.
God in giving the command
every fairy tale is about something real dumbass.
You must have stayed on pleasure Island for too long and those donkey ears are there to stay. (pinnocchio 3:14)
Why is he so aggressive? This isn't the Flame Zone.
all you do is yapp, doggy
It's hard to realize the hypocrisy of your beliefs, that's probably the first clue that you shouldn't be so happy to mock others. Consider it metaphorical, if that helps you out.
You're a flake, go back and read all your yapping this morning and pretend it's not embarrassing and obsessive. You're a gross human. Go someplace else and yapp yapp.
Similar threads
- Poll
New Topics
-
-
-
-
🚨 TX-23's GOP nominee Brandon Herrera owns Mein Kampf...and that’s just the start- Started by Conservative from Georgia
- Replies: 19
-
