JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,896
- 2,220
Bullshit.You gave unreasonable assertions.
They are not unreasonable simply because you say so, idiot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bullshit.You gave unreasonable assertions.
Lol, an Appeal to Ignorance with Appeal to Authority as a backstop.I never said the basis of sentience doesnt need to be proven....I said ask a biologist.
Why is there life?You got the first two paragraphs of this wrong, so....thats just a misunderstanding.You just mocked the belief in God because you don’t see evidence. And now you claim the basis for sentience does not need to be proven because you know it’s not from a creator.Because someone hasnt explained it to you...That’s the issue. No one can answer why elements of the periodic table writes music.I dont have the background to be able to answer that, and wont pretend to.What do you mean before I ask you that. This entire thread is on that subject.
So why do elements of the periodic table write music and watch funny cat videos?
Which proves nothing.
Because they dont. Atoms and bonded atoms don’t care. They are not sentient.
Which means life is something beyond what we can detect.
because youve proven its impossible to explain beyond the shadow of a doubt
^ which is more accurate of the above two statements.
You’re arguing against yourself.
BTW - the OP screams the evidence of a creator. You simply refuse to acknowledge it because it blows your belief system apart.
I never said the basis of sentience doesnt need to be proven....I said ask a biologist.
I took his point to be that since he can't see how life can come from non-life it must be impossible.You are missing his point, which is that mere material (represented by the Periodic Table) cannot account for sentient life.
"I was going to show him a thing or two, but I gotta roast in the oven and had to get home."Thats accurate.
I was going to show you the flaw in the logic, but I couldnt get there because of all of your angry blahblah name calling crap.
Youre just angry old jimmithy, now. Nothing I can do about it. Id recommend sex.
That is why he asked people to explain it.I took his point to be that since he can't see how life can come from non-life it must be impossible.You are missing his point, which is that mere material (represented by the Periodic Table) cannot account for sentient life.
People tried but I don't think he was listening. I wonder if he'll explain how he knows God didn't create life just as science has speculated?That is why he asked people to explain it.
OK.I didnt say "the basis for sentience does not need to be proven."You just mocked the belief in God because you don’t see evidence. And now you claim the basis for sentience does not need to be proven because you know it’s not from a creator.Because someone hasnt explained it to you...That’s the issue. No one can answer why elements of the periodic table writes music.I dont have the background to be able to answer that, and wont pretend to.What do you mean before I ask you that. This entire thread is on that subject.
So why do elements of the periodic table write music and watch funny cat videos?
Which proves nothing.
Because they dont. Atoms and bonded atoms don’t care. They are not sentient.
Which means life is something beyond what we can detect.
because youve proven its impossible to explain beyond the shadow of a doubt
^ which is more accurate of the above two statements.
You’re arguing against yourself.
BTW - the OP screams the evidence of a creator. You simply refuse to acknowledge it because it blows your belief system apart.
You are wrong.
Atoms combine according to the number of electrons in their outer shell, called valence electrons. Nothing random about it, therefore it is YOU who are contradicting the periodic table which is arranged in groups according to their valence electrons.Tell us how these atoms have combined.
You do know you are telling us the Periodic table is wrong and obsolete, don't you?
And the price of tea in China went up.Atoms combine according to the number of electrons in their outer shell, called valence electrons. Nothing random about it, therefore it is YOU who are contradicting the periodic table which is arranged in groups according to their valence electrons.Tell us how these atoms have combined.
You do know you are telling us the Periodic table is wrong and obsolete, don't you?
Good question. Start a thread so people can talk about it.Why did the supernatural creator create creationist that revel in the denigration of those who don't believe in this supernatural creator?
The atoms YOU listed in your OP. DUH!Bonding is what you are talking about.
Tell us what atoms have bonded that are sentient.
So you can't rebut my reply.And the price of tea in China went up.Atoms combine according to the number of electrons in their outer shell, called valence electrons. Nothing random about it, therefore it is YOU who are contradicting the periodic table which is arranged in groups according to their valence electrons.Tell us how these atoms have combined.
You do know you are telling us the Periodic table is wrong and obsolete, don't you?