The Belief That Life Was the Result of an Accident Is Unscientific

[JimBowie1958]

In all your blabbing you still won’t tell us why elements of the Periodic table write music. Or care to listen to music.

Here is another one; what happens to the value of a stock when it goes up or down? Where does the value come from or go to?

That is hilarious as no energy or material changes hands and yet it affects the lives of millions of people.

 

[JimBowie1958]

You make no sense. .

Because you are an I D I O T

 

[Weatherman2020]

[
Unable to prove it in your opinion,which is immaterial since you have shown that you do not care to grasp what people are telling you anyway.

If thats proof to you, then hell i see what im dealing with anyway and like i said...
useless
you dont reason correctly

Lol, I did not give any proof in my statement above and did not attempt to.

You do not even know what proof and reason are, do you?

i have a much firmer grasp than you do, apparently

me: you have no proof
you: yes i do yes i do.
me: give it a shot
you: infinite regression fallacy
me: omg. ermm kay

In all your blabbing you still won’t tell us why elements of the Periodic table write music. Or care to listen to music.

Before you ask me that ...why dont you first point to the post I made which proclaims that I have an in depth background in biology.

You make no sense. All ive told you, is that any random joe on the internet being able to, or not being able to explain this to you does not somehow negate evolution.

it doesnt hinge in that question and messageboarder's ability to answer it. its just absurd.

What do you mean before I ask you that. This entire thread is on that subject.

So why do elements of the periodic table write music and watch funny cat videos?

 

[JimBowie1958]

I grasp it, and so has most that know philosophy except for you.....since, its flawed and you didnt even know that.

It is not flawed just because you think it so. I challenge anyone to prove a flaw to my illustration of the Infinite Regression Fallacy.

Youre a god of the gaps guy.

Nope, not at all.

And youre an ad hom guy.

It isnt ad hominem if it is true, fool.

This is my last post to you until you make a commitment to no ad hom. Bye, Jimmithy

Good, now just shut the **** up and go back to fapping to your porn, mmmk?

 

[JimBowie1958]

I dont have the background to be able to answer that, and wont pretend to.
Which proves nothing.

No, it proves that you are an ignoramus talking out of his ass.

IT proves that, idiot.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Jimmithy, I wont do anything but mock you - youre not worth a discussion with that level of errmeeedeeerp you spew. Sorry, bud.

You only mock yourself, stupid shit4brains.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Lol, I did not give any proof in my statement above and did not attempt to.

You do not even know what proof and reason are, do you?

i have a much firmer grasp than you do, apparently

me: you have no proof
you: yes i do yes i do.
me: give it a shot
you: infinite regression fallacy
me: omg. ermm kay

In all your blabbing you still won’t tell us why elements of the Periodic table write music. Or care to listen to music.

Before you ask me that ...why dont you first point to the post I made which proclaims that I have an in depth background in biology.

You make no sense. All ive told you, is that any random joe on the internet being able to, or not being able to explain this to you does not somehow negate evolution.

it doesnt hinge in that question and messageboarder's ability to answer it. its just absurd.

What do you mean before I ask you that. This entire thread is on that subject.

So why do elements of the periodic table write music and watch funny cat videos?

I dont have the background to be able to answer that, and wont pretend to.

Which proves nothing.

That’s the issue. No one can answer why elements of the periodic table writes music.

Because they dont. Atoms and bonded atoms don’t care. They are not sentient.

Which means life is something beyond what we can detect.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Jimmithy, I wont do anything but mock you - youre not worth a discussion with that level of errmeeedeeerp you spew. Sorry, bud.

You only mock yourself, stupid shit4brains.

According to an old dude who lacks reasoning and pimps sky daddy using logical fallacy and ad hom on the internet?

Whoa thats a mouth full, jimmithy.

And thats what she said, jimbob

No one is talking about a 'Sky Daddy' except you, idiot, throughout this entire thread.

 

[alang1216]

This is who we are. Just a pile of elements from the Periodic Table...

If you understood science better you'd see what a silly question this is. But others have tried to point this out so I won't bother. I'll only say how funny it is that creationists can not say how their God created life (or did anything for that matter) they only know how he didn't create life.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I say sky daddy as a form of mockery towards liars

That is a lie.

IT is because you do not grasp the difference between Zeus and the Creator.

 

[Political Junky]

This is who we are. Just a pile of elements from the Periodic Table.
View attachment 152348

Same elements you will find all around you. When you die, those elements will continue to exist with no effect upon them. Carbon atoms will still be carbon atoms after you die.
View attachment 152347

No matter how accurate you are in combing all of the ratios of atoms in a living being, it is not going to become animated.

View attachment 152349

Atoms are not going to write Beethoven, they does not want to listen to Beethoven, nor does the pile of atoms care if it a living being lives or dies, because the elements have nothing to gain or lose either way. Atoms have no interest in talking to each other, laughing at funny cat videos, or even reading and responding on USMB. Atoms just do not care.

How anyone can delude themselves to believe atoms do have sentient life is beyond me.

I'd like to see you explain the information in your OP.

 

[JimBowie1958]

If you understood science better you'd see what a silly question this is. But others have tried to point this out so I won't bother. I'll only say how funny it is that creationists can not say how their God created life (or did anything for that matter) they only know how he didn't create life.

You are missing his point, which is that mere material (represented by the Periodic Table) cannot account for sentient life.

Science can only address repeatable deterministic natural events and cannot prove or disprove anything beyond that narrow scope of inquiry.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I say sky daddy as a form of mockery towards liars

That is a lie.

IT is because you do not grasp the difference between Zeus and the Creator.

Incorrect, but co0l assertion.

I dont have reasoned discussions with pig headed, angry ass holes.

Sorry, jimmithy. I even sent you the olive branch and your fat ass broke it.

**** your olive branch, moron.

I gave evidence and you couldnt handle it and decided to whine all the way home instead.

I dont care what idiots like you do.

 

[Weatherman2020]

In all your blabbing you still won’t tell us why elements of the Periodic table write music. Or care to listen to music.

Before you ask me that ...why dont you first point to the post I made which proclaims that I have an in depth background in biology.

You make no sense. All ive told you, is that any random joe on the internet being able to, or not being able to explain this to you does not somehow negate evolution.

it doesnt hinge in that question and messageboarder's ability to answer it. its just absurd.

What do you mean before I ask you that. This entire thread is on that subject.

So why do elements of the periodic table write music and watch funny cat videos?

I dont have the background to be able to answer that, and wont pretend to.

Which proves nothing.

That’s the issue. No one can answer why elements of the periodic table writes music.

Because they dont. Atoms and bonded atoms don’t care. They are not sentient.

Which means life is something beyond what we can detect.

Because someone hasnt explained it to you...

because youve proven its impossible to explain beyond the shadow of a doubt



^ which is more accurate of the above two statements.

You just mocked the belief in God because you don’t see evidence. And now you claim the basis for sentience does not need to be proven because you know it’s not from a creator.

You’re arguing against yourself.

BTW - the OP screams the evidence of a creator. You simply refuse to acknowledge it because it blows your belief system apart.