Zone1 The "Baby Mama" phenomenon in Black culture. The flip side of 75 percent Fatherless homes.

[JoeB131]

That's bullcrap and you know it. When your apartment and car get blown up you don't care what the motivation of the destroyers is. You'd want the rockets stopped before you get killed.

And the first question I would ask is WHY they are firing missiles... Because the Zionist Entity has been trying to pummel the Palestinian people into submission for 80 years and it hasn't worked.

 

[JoeB131]

It’s quite telling that we have leftists so eager to keep black people down that they insult blacks who are helping other blacks to succeed.

How is he scamming people in his community out of money to build a community center that he profits from "Helping" at all?

Within 10 years, I expect to see this guys picture in the Sun-Times related to some kind of embezzlement scandal.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And the first question I would ask is WHY they are firing missiles... Because the Zionist Entity has been trying to pummel the Palestinian people into submission for 80 years and it hasn't worked.

What hilarious horseshit.

If the Muslim death cult freaks lay down their weapons, there will be peace.

If Israel lays down its weapons, there will be no more Israel.

 

[JoeB131]

What hilarious horseshit.

If the Muslim death cult freaks lay down their weapons, there will be peace.

If Israel lays down its weapons, there will be no more Israel.

You say that like it would be a bad thing.

The problem with Israel is that it's a colonial settler state based on the elimination of the indigenous people. (And, no the Jews aren't the indigenous people, they are settler from Europe who just adopted some Bronze Age Fairy Stories.)

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You say that like it would be a bad thing.

Must be my good ethics and morality.

 

[Hector12]

Thanks. The big question is: why do the blacktivists want blacks to fail?

Black activists want blacks to fail so failing blacks will become revolutionaries and take orders from black activists.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Black activists want blacks to fail so failing blacks will become revolutionaries and take orders from black activists.

You don't even believe that. Stormfront reject.

 

[Lisa558]

Black activists want blacks to fail so failing blacks will become revolutionaries and take orders from black activists.

Nah. I think they want blacks to fail because they want to blame the failures on bad ******. Their hate for whites supersedes their desire for blacks to do well.

 

[Hector12]

You say that like it would be a bad thing.

The problem with Israel is that it's a colonial settler state based on the elimination of the indigenous people. (And, no the Jews aren't the indigenous people, they are settler from Europe who just adopted some Bronze Age Fairy Stories.)

The destruction of Israel would be a very bad thing. Palestine was a third world dump. Israel is a first world oasis of civilization.

The Jews are the most superior 0.2% of the world's population. Palestinians have never achieved anything of note during their two thousand years of existence.

When a superior race displaces an inferior race, civilization and the process of human evolution move forward.

 

[JoeB131]

Must be my good ethics and morality.

Good Ethics and Morality wouldn't support a colonial state.

There's a reason why the European Empires were dismantled after WWII.

The destruction of Israel would be a very bad thing. Palestine was a third world dump. Israel is a first world oasis of civilization.

Works on the assumption that the "First World" is the be-all and end-all of human civilization.

 

[MarathonMike]

Okay, but I feel like it has been. The data is all there. Better education as kids, and better education about and access to contraception at all levels. Also, a higher standard of living reduces this phenomenon's occurence.

But then you run smack dab into a political minority with outsized power that obstructs all of it... for.... "reasons".

So here we are.

It has to start with the city level leadership. Obviously the Federal level leadership of both parties always has 20 priorities ahead of the inner cities and that won't change. Chicago got rid of Mayor Lightfoot and replaced her with someone even more incompetent. That's not the kind of change that is needed. All the things you mentioned plus supporting more grass roots outreach such as what Project H.O.O.D and others are doing can turn the tide.

 

[Hector12]

Good Ethics and Morality wouldn't support a colonial state.

There's a reason why the European Empires were dismantled after WWII.

British analysis discovered that the cost of maintaining their empire exceeded the financial benefits.

Nevertheless, European colonies in sub Saharan Africa ended centuries too early. When a civilized nation subdues barbarians the eugenic benefits require centuries to become obvious.

 

[JoeB131]

It has to start with the city level leadership. Obviously the Federal level leadership of both parties always has 20 priorities ahead of the inner cities and that won't change. Chicago got rid of Mayor Lightfoot and replaced her with someone even more incompetent. That's not the kind of change that is needed. All the things you mentioned plus supporting more grass roots outreach such as what Project H.O.O.D and others are doing can turn the tide.

I think you fail to understand why Lori lost. Lori lost for the same reason Trump did, the voters were angry about Covid and wanted to take it out on someone.

The mistake the FOP made was thinking that anger at Lori was a license to support Paul Vallas who would let them go back to cracking skulls.

 

[JoeB131]

British analysis discovered that the cost of maintaining their empire exceeded the financial benefits.

Actually, no. The British found India to be a VERY Profitable colony. They looted the crap out of it. They turned one of the most prosperous areas in the world to one of the poorest. India is finally recovering from British help, and they have the world's 5th largest economy (Passing up the UK as #6)

The African colonies were more money to maintain than benefits produced, but that is because the human resources there had not been developed to exploit the natural resources.

Nevertheless, European colonies in sub Saharan Africa ended centuries too early. When a civilized nation subdues barbarians the eugenic benefits require centuries to become obvious.

Um, no, frankly no region has really been improved by Colonial Rule.

 

[Hector12]

Actually, no. The British found India to be a VERY Profitable colony. They looted the crap out of it. They turned one of the most prosperous areas in the world to one of the poorest. India is finally recovering from British help, and they have the world's 5th largest economy (Passing up the UK as #6)

Imperial Measurement: A Cost–Benefit Analysis of Western Colonialism​

KRISTIAN NIEMIETZ

1 MAY 2024

While imperialism was undoubtedly extremely lucrative for some people, it is not at all clear whether Britain as a whole benefited economically from it. If such overall gains existed at all, they must have been very modest, and it is quite possible that the empire was a net lossmaker for Britain...

• Colonial empires do not come cheap. The acquisition, defence and administration of overseas territories require huge upfront investments and ongoing maintenance costs. This is why, in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Britain and other colonial empires had higher levels of military expenditure than their less imperialist neighbours and, consequently, a substantially higher tax burden...
• Not all Western countries were major colonial powers. Some had only minor colonial possessions, some had only short-lived colonial empires, some only acquired colonies very late in the day, and some never had any colonies. Those minor players in the colonial arms race industrialised at roughly the same speed as the major colonial empires, so if there was an ‘empire bonus’, it is not visible in the macro data.
• Imperial Measurement: A Cost–Benefit Analysis of Western Colonialism

 

[JoeB131]

Imperial Measurement: A Cost–Benefit Analysis of Western Colonialism​

KRISTIAN NIEMIETZ

1 MAY 2024

While imperialism was undoubtedly extremely lucrative for some people, it is not at all clear whether Britain as a whole benefited economically from it. If such overall gains existed at all, they must have been very modest, and it is quite possible that the empire was a net lossmaker for Britain...

• Colonial empires do not come cheap. The acquisition, defence and administration of overseas territories require huge upfront investments and ongoing maintenance costs. This is why, in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Britain and other colonial empires had higher levels of military expenditure than their less imperialist neighbours and, consequently, a substantially higher tax burden...
• 
  
• Not all Western countries were major colonial powers. Some had only minor colonial possessions, some had only short-lived colonial empires, some only acquired colonies very late in the day, and some never had any colonies. Those minor players in the colonial arms race industrialised at roughly the same speed as the major colonial empires, so if there was an ‘empire bonus’, it is not visible in the macro data.
• Imperial Measurement: A Cost–Benefit Analysis of Western Colonialism

Okay, Captain Cut and Paste, get back to me when you get anywhere near a point.

 

[Hector12]

Um, no, frankly no region has really been improved by Colonial Rule.

Scramble for Africa​

Technological advances facilitated European expansion overseas. Industrialization brought about rapid advancements in transportation and communication, especially in the forms of steamships, railways and telegraphs. Medical advances also played an important role, especially medicines for tropical diseases, which helped control their adverse effects. The development of quinine, an effective treatment for malaria, made vast expanses of the tropics more accessible for Europeans.[8]​

Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

---------------

The decolonisation of Africa was a series of political developments in Africa that spanned from the mid-1950s to 1975, during the Cold War. Colonial governments gave way to sovereign states in a process often marred by violence, political turmoil, widespread unrest, and organised revolts. Major events in the decolonisation of Africa included the Mau Mau rebellion, the Algerian War, the Congo Crisis, the Angolan War of Independence, the Zanzibar Revolution, and the events leading to the Nigerian Civil War.[1][2][3][4][5]

Decolonisation of Africa - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Hector12]

Okay, Captain Cut and Paste, get back to me when you get anywhere near a point.

My point appears to have been over your head.

 

[AZrailwhale]

And the first question I would ask is WHY they are firing missiles... Because the Zionist Entity has been trying to pummel the Palestinian people into submission for 80 years and it hasn't worked.

The Islamics have been trying to wipe out the Israelis since 1920, long before there was an Israel.

 

[AZrailwhale]

You say that like it would be a bad thing.

The problem with Israel is that it's a colonial settler state based on the elimination of the indigenous people. (And, no the Jews aren't the indigenous people, they are settler from Europe who just adopted some Bronze Age Fairy Stories.)

You speak of the Israelis as a good thing, that is another indicate how evil you are.