/———/ Yeah, we believe you. Sure we do.Correct.
But the dishonest right will continue to lie about guns being banned and confiscated.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
/———/ Yeah, we believe you. Sure we do.Correct.
But the dishonest right will continue to lie about guns being banned and confiscated.
It gets the gullible to buy more guns.Correct.
But the dishonest right will continue to lie about guns being banned and confiscated.
Because.................it fucking happened, dumbass./———/ And you know this how??? TDS Bwhahahaha Bwhahahaha
Guns aren't going to be banned or confiscated, that's nothing but rightwing demagoguery and lies./———/ Yeah, we believe you. Sure we do.
Conservatives lie about bans and confiscation to keep the base frightened, angry, and going to the polls.It gets the gullible to buy more guns.
You would have to be pretty damned stupid to go out and purchase something, you're convinced...........will be banned.
How so? Trump supporters aren't the government. They're citizens, excercising their rights. That literally the antithesis of tyranny.No, but Trump's cult is.
/——-/ Your gun grabbing buddies already ratted you out. (WATCH) Democrats Openly Admit They Want to Confiscate Firearms in 'Common Use'Guns aren't going to be banned or confiscated, that's nothing but rightwing demagoguery and lies.
He knows. He chooses to lie./——-/ Your gun grabbing buddies already ratted you out. (WATCH) Democrats Openly Admit They Want to Confiscate Firearms in 'Common Use'
Trump didn't need to, Trump's cult was already going to attack the capitol and he never to them to go home, after his pity rally, he told them to go.
/——-/ (WATCH) Democrats Openly Admit They Want to Confiscate Firearms in 'Common Use'Correct.
But the dishonest right will continue to lie about guns being banned and confiscated.
Further reading of the discussion brings into question of whether that graduate level you claim to read at is graduate school, high school, or 3rd grade.Perhaps you should reconsider how it is you frame an argument and what manner of information you include in that arguement.
I happen to read at a Graduate level. You? I have doubts.,
In the paragraph above, you tie the right to the militia. You're the one wrong. The right is NOT tied to the militia. The militia is NOT the reason the right cannot be infringed. That's the argument that the left uses, suggesting that the militia is no longer used so there's no longer a right.The prefatory clause, as is agreed to by most legal scholars and linguists, is an explanation for the purpose of why government SHALL not infringe up the right of the people.
Well, duh. What I proved by using the original writings of those who drove the creation of the 2nd Amendment, is that the militia clause is NOT tied to the right to keep and bear arms. The right to keep and bear arms is independent of the militia clause. Therefore, I said, in fact I proved beyond doubt, exactly what you're yelling at me in the paragraph above.In every instance where the Bill of Rights speaks, the Amendments are either a restriction on government or an unassailable right OF THE PEOPLE.
Once again, you demonstrate that you must have gotten your graduate degree by mail order. Quote where I said that the 2nd Amendment gives authority to the state to form militias or that militias are a requirement to keep and bear arms? Your reading comprehension is completely high-school-dropout level.Having college graduates work for you is proof of your intelligence?
Wow.
I read at a level considered "graduate" by English scholars.
I read the post, and you are wrong, as you lack the understanding of a simple compound statement that uses an explanatory clause to justify the premise of the foremost thought.
Give it up. The Second Amendment does NOT give authority to the state to form militias and they -- militias -- are not a requirement for the ownership of weapons.
Full stop.
You can disagree all you like, but you are clearly wrong.
I donate a million dollars each year to each of the NRA and GOA.Dumbfuck your word salad wasn't read. The second amendment has been weaken however gun owners are taking it back. I'm a gun rights activists you are not. I give thousands of dollars every year to groups like the second amendment foundation, FPC, Gun Owners of America. I am a life time member of the Second Amendment Foundation and the GOA. I am also a paid subscriber to Armed American Radio. The three groups I mentioned are the ones that fight in court defending my rights. So who do you contribute too?
Good Job! A gold star for you:The constitution was written at the 1787 Philadelphia Convention and was ratified through a series of state conventions held in 1787 and 1788.
I don't have to show the line. You're the one that says there's a line and that some arms aren't protected. You're the one that says only commonly used arms are protected. You're the one that says the government can take any right they want, any and all of them.Similarly...
You should be able to tell us the ownership and use of which "arms" are protected by the 2nd, which "arms" are not, and where the constituton draws the line.
And you can't.
You shall now prove me right, and you an idiot.
Now I know you're full of shitI donate a million dollars each year to each of the NRA and GOA.
No it's leftist demagoguery. And their end game.Guns aren't going to be banned or confiscated, that's nothing but rightwing demagoguery and lies.
Haha.. I was giving you some credit for just being ignorant. Now you've gone full-leftist, taking my comment completely out of context.Now I know you're full of shit
Sure, nothing to see here.How so? Trump supporters aren't the government. They're citizens, excercising their rights. That literally the antithesis of tyranny.
Yes, when on active duty.Good Job! A gold star for you:
Now, then, since the Pennsylvania militia was created in 1777, 10 years before, then the Pennsylvania militia existed when the militia members had their militia provide rifles in their possession and refused to turn them in for cleaning.
I'm glad to see you admit you were wrong. Will you now also admit that the militia members had militia owned rifles in their possession?