The Arab state was designed to fail by the UN.

Even though untrue, (Al Quds is mentioned in the Koran.) why would it matter if Jerusalem were mentioned in the Koran or not? The native people of Palestine, Jerusalem included, were Christians and Muslims before the European Jew invasion started in the 1800s. Even in 1896, when the first filming of Palestine took place, the Christians and Muslims were the overwhelming majority in Palestine after decades of European Jew invasion.


Monty'ism Alert!

The boy is babbling along with the YouTube video he cuts and pastes multiple times across multiple threads. The boy needs to learn his islamo-history. The Arab-Moslems he whimsically refers to as "native people" were actually Turkish invaders and later, Arab squatters from adjoining Islamist nations.

Poor, Monty. His synapses are on a permanent ceasefire.
 
Immigration is not the same as "invasion". People have immigrated throughout continents for generations. If you live in Canada, you are no doubt descended from immigrants.

Yeah, but by their arguments that makes us the indigenous people of Canada.

The result of the migration of Europeans to Canada, as well as the result of the European migration to Palestine makes the migration an invasion. Who believes that the European migration to the New World was not an invasion?
 
Immigration is not the same as "invasion". People have immigrated throughout continents for generations. If you live in Canada, you are no doubt descended from immigrants.

Yeah, but by their arguments that makes us the indigenous people of Canada.

The result of the migration of Europeans to Canada, as well as the result of the European migration to Palestine makes the migration an invasion. Who believes that the European migration to the New World was not an invasion?

And the migration of Arabs into "Palestine" is also, then, an invasion. So, by supporting Palestine as Arab Muslim self-determination, you are, in fact, supporting one particular invasion at the expense of both other "invasions" and the indigenous peoples.
 
What migration of "Arabs" into Palestine? If you mean the Arabians, from the Arabian peninsula, they represented the officer corps of armies whose soldiers were local converts. How many Arabians do you think there were? The desert doesn't promote large populations. The Arabians that conquered Palestine just replaced the Romans (Byzantines) as rulers, the local populace, who were Christians, remained the same people though eventually most converted to Islam.

Arab is a linguistic and cultural group, just like all Hispanic are not Spanish all Arabs are not Arabians.
 
What migration of "Arabs" into Palestine? If you mean the Arabians, from the Arabian peninsula, they represented the officer corps of armies whose soldiers were local converts. How many Arabians do you think there were? The desert doesn't promote large populations. The Arabians that conquered Palestine just replaced the Romans (Byzantines) as rulers, the local populace, who were Christians, remained the same people though eventually most converted to Islam.

Arab is a linguistic and cultural group, just like all Hispanic are not Spanish all Arabs are not Arabians.

See bold section of your post. I am talking about the cultural group who were plentiful enough to entirely change the language, religion and culture of those who existed prior to their invasion.

The idea you are trying to present -- that it either didn't happen or somehow wasn't a migration which is equivalent to the migrations you are calling "invasions" is ridiculous.

So, I ask again, why are you supporting this one particular invasion and not other invasions or the indigenous peoples?
 
Very few Romans migrated to Palestine, yet the native people adopted the Roman religion(s) and language. The people were the same people that were there before the Romans. You don't have a very good grasp of history or the dynamics of invasions. The Arabians conquered Sicily and ruled it for several centuries, it didn't change the native people much, if at all. Just a few Arab words and expressions remain in the Sicilian dialect. Same for Spain, when the Arabian rulers were expelled the Spanish went back to being Spanish.

The descendants of the Christian natives of Palestine and were conquered by the Arabians are now mostly Muslim and speak Arabic. Until the European Jewish invasion 20% or more were still Christian, by the way.

By the way, it's not an idea it's fact. Any historian will confirm the history. You have only been exposed to Zionist propaganda.
 
Immigration is not the same as "invasion". People have immigrated throughout continents for generations. If you live in Canada, you are no doubt descended from immigrants.

Yeah, but by their arguments that makes us the indigenous people of Canada.

The result of the migration of Europeans to Canada, as well as the result of the European migration to Palestine makes the migration an invasion. Who believes that the European migration to the New World was not an invasion?






Then why don't you start the ball rolling and hand back your stolen lands, or are you too much of a hypocrite. You want 1995 international laws to be used retrospectively, so why not against yourself .......................................
 

Forum List

Back
Top