The 15th amendment: How does it apply to arguments over whether voting is a right or a privilege?

Dante

I have always been here
Joined
Dec 1, 2008
Messages
81,532
Reaction score
39,747
Points
2,300
Location
Rebellion Central
Somebody I am acquainted with posed a question. That question was - if one supports a national voter list, do they also support a national gun registry, and if not, why? I see people jumping through hoops on this one, performing gymnastics feats that are trumpian in nature.

So, it got me thinking: What do people believe the 15th amendment is all about? What sources (if any at all), do people use to from their opinions?

15th Amendment scroll.webp
 
Somebody I am acquainted with posed a question. That question was - if one supports a national voter list, do they also support a national gun registry, and if not, why? I see people jumping through hoops on this one, performing gymnastics feats that are trumpian in nature.

So, it got me thinking: What do people believe the 15th amendment is all about? What sources (if any at all), do people use to from their opinions?

View attachment 1238079
Read the first ten words after "Section 1." Totally contrary to democrat desires.
 
So, it got me thinking:
Maybe for the first time in your pathetic life......

But thanks for posting this.

The question in my mind is whether it just applies to federal elections.
 
It's a federal law. It applies to ALL elections within the USA.
It's not a law.

It's an amendment.

It should support all laws. And yet, we don't seem to behave that way.
 
It's not a law.

It's an amendment.

It should support all laws. And yet, we don't seem to behave that way.
Amendments are not "law?"

PLEASE! SOMEBODY NOTIFY THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES.

AI Overview BOTS ARE LAUGHING AT YOU:

"Amendments to the U.S. Constitution are not merely ordinary laws (statutes), but rather fundamental, supreme laws that alter the structure of government. While laws are passed by Congress and signed by the President, constitutional amendments are added via a special process, requiring ratification by three-fourths of the states, making them higher authority than statutes."

Now, one of the few times I had to put somebody on an IGNORE LIST (it shall remain temporary, but what a dufus troll this turd is)
 
Amendments are not "law?"

PLEASE! SOMEBODY NOTIFY THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES.

AI Overview BOTS ARE LAUGHING AT YOU:

"Amendments to the U.S. Constitution are not merely ordinary laws (statutes), but rather fundamental, supreme laws that alter the structure of government. While laws are passed by Congress and signed by the President, constitutional amendments are added via a special process, requiring ratification by three-fourths of the states, making them higher authority than statutes."

Now, one of the few times I had to put somebody on an IGNORE LIST (it shall remain temporary, but what a dufus troll this turd is)
Amendments and regular laws differ in their nature and the process of implementation. Amendments are changes or additions made to a constitution, statute, or legislative bill, and they are usually brought about by a set procedure. They are often necessary to address inconsistencies between laws and the constitution, and they can fundamentally alter a country's political system. Amendments are typically proposed by a legislative body, like Congress in the US, and then ratified by a supermajority of states or state legislatures. On the other hand, regular laws are numerous and are approved by both houses of a legislative body and the head of state, like the US Congress and the President. These laws are then implemented by relevant federal agencies and are subject to judicial review for their constitutional validity.


The justices already know.

Read the First....it tells congress what laws it can't make.

Read the Ninth....how is that a "law"

Read the Tenth.....how is that a "law".

The explanation will help you out.

Hopefully, you quit listening to ChatGPT for your knowledge..... :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301:

Please don't take me off ignore. I can't help but waste time responding to your ridiculously stupid attempts to sound like a smart human being.
 
Back
Top Bottom